Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Immaculate GTR, well looked after & serviced. Currently 95,000kms. Imported at 75,000kms in 2005 after an extensive search in Japan for one in this condition.

1000kms since full top and bottom end re-build of engine by AVO TurboWorld - just run in.

Tomei Cam wheels, Stainless Steel head gasket, strengthened Head Studs

Speed Technology surge tank & porsche hi-vol fuel pump.

Large TRUST Intercooler,

Blitz 4 inch Exhaust,

HKS Pod filters,

Blitz twin BOV,

Twin Plate Heavy Duty Button Clutch

Fully Adjustable Tein Coil Over Suspension, lowered 1.5 inches,

Race Pads & fluid,

Nexxen 225/50 16inch tyres, factory rims, strut tower brace front & back.

Kenwood MP3 player, speakers & amp.

Aust Standard immobiliser & alarm.

Blitz Timer & Digital Boost guage.

Car has run a 12.6qtr mile. Running 0.87bar.

Genuine reason for sale, first to see will buy.

$24,500 inc RWC. Car is in eastern suburbs of VIC.

Phil. 0412 950 992.

post-23227-1189918294_thumb.jpg

post-23227-1189918323_thumb.jpg

post-23227-1189918342_thumb.jpg

post-23227-1189918351_thumb.jpg

post-23227-1189918362_thumb.jpg

Edited by captainah
  • 2 weeks later...

selling outright. I need the cash to fund some unexpected expenses.....open to offers at this stage (fair offers - have spend $10K on rebuild, and then $300 on hicas steering arm replacement last week at the 1000 km service post rebuild - to prep the car for sale). This car has new rings, bearings, etc etc ie full rebuild.

To answer a couple of questions I've been asked in PM & offline - tyres are in good nic, never boosted past 0.9bar (pneumatic bleed adjuster means it used to momentarily spike to around 0.93, but now have it running 0.87 - spikes to around 0.9 before settling quickly at 0.87 - safe for a GTR) - factory turbos & ECU. Car has been dynoed with 207kws at the wheels. As you can see from the qtr time - it's fast.

Edited by captainah

...and 1000 km svc & rack ends replacement (hicas warning light is being reset by the factory next friday, ready for sale). All this spent since April, only done about 1200 kms since then.

post-23227-1190935507_thumb.jpg

ok alignment done, but rear rack has play - so getting that replaced now (car not really drivable for the next week, but people are welcome to come and have a look anyway).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...