Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok guy's i need some help, after being unstarted for about 12 months my r32 gtr is having a bit of trouble coughing back into life. After a rebuild its ready to go apart from the obvious problem of not firing, heres what has happend so far and all of this is since she was last driven before a part stripdown for paint etc, ok the wiring in the rear half of the car was removed very carefully and put back in after painting, fuel tank was removed, cleaned and flushed and put back in, dash was out but loom stayed in place, oil change and 10 litres of 98 and a new fuel filter were all put in, cranked with no start.

what i know...

1. I do have a spark, plugs were pulled and earthed and were producing a good spark.

2. Ecu is good, took it out and put it in a friends gtr, ran fine, actually better than his, ( he was a bit pissed off lol)

3. I have 50lbs of fuel pressure, plenty i'm told.

4. injectors were removed and tested, all 100% fine and clean.

5. I have fuel in the fuel rail.

6. I have 13 volts at the battery.

7. I Have looked at all the fuses in the car, and they are good, relays i do not know how to test.

8. When it was at the painters, they were trying to get the drivers window down using a spare battery and wires, whilst doing this there was a small spark as wires touched a plug in the door(mirrors plug or window plug) , i do not believe this to have created the problem , but guess it could have upset a relay or fuse???

9. When the plugs were out we looked at the top of pistions after cranking and there was absolutely no fuel in there, dry as a bone, so maybe the injector pulse???

10. earths have been checked in painted areas.

11, i love my Car, would really like some help here guys

Thanks

Edited by ECCE

You sound fairly cluey. So this may sound silly but, you need 3 things.

A good strong spark - Use a spark tester to check strength or a screw driver holding it close to earth to see how long it will jump (careful you dont shock yourself!)

About 300kpa of fuel pressure - Use a noid light or multi meter or test light to check for injector pulse.

Decent compression - Check with a comp guage and look for about 150+ psi

Hope that helps,

Deren

Hi deren, sure its the injectors pulse, or related to that

what about a relay, which is the eccs relay?? near the ecu??

hows your rebuild going? i know what thats like....

hope you saved the window seals unlike me.. get ready for a heart attack

monster 4000hrs and counting total rebuild.. but car not co-operating. lol

Edited by ECCE

50 psi fuel sounds too much. Should be around 40.

If you have spark, then the ECU is working. Have you tested the injectors in a tester, or still connected to the loom?

And you have compression?

Hey guys, well the car last drove about 12 months ago, a went fantastic, so i would find it hard to believe it is a compression prob, have just got some "blazt software", you guys ever use this? looks pretty easy, hopefully will throw out a fault code, so relays anyone??? ecce relay?? is that next to ecu??? colour???

See if you can find the workshop manual. If will tell you how to run a diagnostic on the ECU without any software. Maybe able to pinpoint whats faulty.

I saved the side window seals but the front and rears were damaged in removal so either going to get non genuine or bite the bullet and go genuine..

There are 2 relays down behind the ECU - 1 is the ECCS relay, the other is Ign Coils. Both relays are probably working, since you have spark happening. The ECCS actually supplies power to the coil relay.

When IGN is applied, the injectors should have direct 12V (ECU switches them to earth). Check for continuity in the loom between each injector plug and its corresponding pin at the ECU - 1 - 1, 2 - 12, 3 - 3, 4 - 13, 5 - 2, 6 - 11

How did you test the injectors?

Just because they work in a test rig doesn't mean they work in an engine. I once had a set that occasionally shut down at idle (low duty cycle). But if I kept the revs up, the engine continued to run. When I took them back to the place I got them, I was told they worked fine (test rig, HIGH duty cycle).

Pull the fuel rail and stick each injector in a jar (or something to catch fuel) - still connected to the loom! Now crank. Any fuel coming out? Can you hear the injectors pulsing (use the old screwdriver-as-a-stethoscope trick)?

Have you tried boosting your battery from another battery / booster pack, ie jump starting your engine?

Well i thought you guys would like to know what happened, i pulled out the 2 relays near the ecu and ordered some new ones, they arrived today, had the mech put the injectors back in so that i could test it with some datascan software, so he put it back together and hey presto it started straight away, perfectly, pulled the lid of the old relays and one was broken, a connection wire had broken but was still intact, so there you have it, solved, thank you to those of you that helped, your input was all very much appreciated..

will post some pics of black beauty ina few weeks once rebuild is complete.

kind regards..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...