Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey,

Just say I wanted to turbocharge a VH41DE...

VH41DE has CR of 10.5:1, I am guessing 9.5:1 would be better suited to turbocharging...

Can you use shorter rods to drop the CR to 9.5?

Would this actually increase displacement to roughly 4531cc? ((4100cc x 10.5) / 9.5)

I am guessing I am wrong, but just want to know...

It won't change the capacity, because the engine still has the same stroke (controlled by the crank, not the rod!) and bore.

A shorter rod will pull the piston down the bore, so it sits too low at TDC. If you are going to use a shorter rod, then you will need a piston with a lower pin height to push the piston back up to the top of the bore at TDC.

You could also investigate modified pistons (less crown), and possibly enlarging the combustion chamber a tad.

Anyone know anything about using VQ30DET pistons in the VH engines?

Quote From http://forums.nicoclub.com/zerothread?id=263218#2780566

They have the same bore and wrist pin measurements, and very similar compression height, and have a dished design.

It won't change the capacity, because the engine still has the same stroke (controlled by the crank, not the rod!) and bore.

A shorter rod will pull the piston down the bore, so it sits too low at TDC. If you are going to use a shorter rod, then you will need a piston with a lower pin height to push the piston back up to the top of the bore at TDC.

You could also investigate modified pistons (less crown), and possibly enlarging the combustion chamber a tad.

This doesn't make sense to me. If the rod is shorter and nothing else changes then the piston will be lower in the bore at TDC lowering the CR - but not a particularly good way to do it - and it will be the same amount lower in the bore at BDC thus a slight increase in capacity.

Why would you use a shorter rod then raise the piston with a lower pin height? You would end up right back where you started.

I think you should take the pistons and the heads to your machinist and tell him what CR you want. He can take some meat off the pistons and out of the combustion chambers. I would suggest 8.5-9:1 to make it easier to tune. What boost levels are you planning on?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So the original radiator is leaking now. Looking at getting a fully aluminium one next. Am I correct in saying that the Series 2 Auto Stageas have a separate trans cooler from factory (located in between the rad and intercooler in my previous post/message).   Currently looking at Fenix $460, Blitz $700, GReddy $800, and KoyoRad $740. What are everyones thought on Fenix ( ive read a few comments saying theyre cheap Chinese rebrands etc and how their build quality is... well.. chinese...)  compared to the others? Worth the extra couple hundies?
    • Man, different parts but the same numbers is terrible @dbm7! And it doesn't help that most online shops don't list the part numbers at all. They just give a list of compatible models...
    • Slow when hot could also be because its getting more dynamic compression, OR things are getting a bit tighter once it is all expanded. If it were an earthing issue, typically I'd expect you to have it have issues all the time. Unless it's really a combination of both things. Where the higher compression, and things being a bit tighter, is giving that bit of extra load and you do need a slight clean up on the cables/connections.
    • Yeah, this is one of the most annoying things about nissan part numbers... I've got an unrelated example... Image is of the AT output shaft ~ they have the same part#, but clearly the shaft on the left is beefier design to that on the right ...the difference (essentially) is the 'lighter' shaft on the right, is for engines up to RB25DE (this includes RB20 variants) : the shaft on the left is for RB25/26DET(T)....are they interchangeable? Yes...but obviously one shaft is going to be stronger than the other...and, the lighter shaft is around USD115, but the heavier shaft closer to USD150...same part#... ...epc-data usually tells a tale ~ the amayama listing for 39100-23U60 has a note "Longest side is between 60 and 105 cm" ; no such info is there for 39100-23U70 ...and given the great disparity in price between the 2 parts, it makes me at least curious (to the point of caution) where the 'extra money' went? ...ie; these 2 parts have a cost difference that (to myself at least) isn't explained by 'plastic boot'...ie; with amayama there's AUD700 price difference ...plastic versus rubber?...I'm not seeing it like that...and 60cm ~ 105cm...??...that's a huge disparity....something hinky going on here... I'd try searching by VIN, not model... /2cents
×
×
  • Create New...