Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hello from Las Vegas! I've lurked here for a while researching info on my RB swap, but this time I have some questions regarding R32 rear subframe onto a S13 chassis.

Basically, my s13 rear subframe has been tweaked for months now (curbed, woops). My next project I want to complete is:

* Replace my rear subframe

* Go with solid subframe bushings

* Go 5 lug at the same time

* Upgrade the brakes to larger caliper.

* Keep cable e-brake if possible... Otherwise step up to hydraulic

* Add rear multilink arms

* Go to 4.4 final drive

* Goal: Keep/Re-use my 2way s13 non-vlsd/non-abs Kaaz

* Goal: Keep/Re-use my s13 coilovers

* Goal: Keep/Re-use my Whiteline rear sway bar

* Goal: Minimize labor & costs, do most of the work out of car and install as a unit.

I've just recently started researching this project, but I have some questions:

I think an R32 rear subframe bolts directly up to s13, but will of course require a HICAS eliminator. I am thinking of sourcing a complete r32 rear: subframe+diff+axles+arms+hubs+brakes. I will add solid bushings and multilink arms.

1) Can someone please verify the s13 and r32 rear arms are identical?

2) I believe the r32 non-GTRs came with 4.36 R&P final drive in an r200 housing with 5-bolt output shafts? Will I be able to swap my S13 non-ABS non-VLSD Kaaz 2way diff into this new housing?

3) Was non-ABS an option on non-GTR r32s? I ask because my s13 does not have ABS, not sure if this is going to be an issue (driveshaft length?)

4) One last question, will I be able to use my S13 coilovers with the R32 spindles? Not sure but I think I will need to use r32/z32? coilover lower halfs.

I am open to any suggestions you may have.. From what I have read there is no real difference between the S13 and R32 rear subframe, but I want the 4.36 and the 5 lug hubs/brakes also. I can source complete R32 subframe/rear end from our japanese importer, but I need to be sure what I'm ordering first.

Thank you for your help

Edited by mello88
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/191851-r32-rear-subframe-to-s13/
Share on other sites

better off with a non hicas rear subframe i.e s13 with all the 32 gear bolted on

even if you lock the hicas with a bar Ive seen a number wear out the hicas ball joints on 32's a31's

swap to the r32/r33/a31 drum style handbrake just need to use 33 cables or you can buy kits x japan off yahoo

1. yep there the same (gts-t were talking about )

2. hmm not sure on this one r200 is r200 though so should be possible

3. yes I have a non abs R32 gts-t probably more non abs than abs around in gts-t's

4. if you use a gts-t craddle yes if you use a gtr craddle no the bottom mounts are different (there forked sorta)

my suggestion as above get

new s13 non hicas craddle (or even s14,s15 Ive heard these are better)

r32 gts-t diff 4.38 ratio (use it just for crown wheel and pinon)

r32 gts-t brake setup (calipers, drum setup, hubs ,backing plates these are important as the drum setup mounts to this)

cable kit x japan or 33 cables

reuse your driveshafts, camber arms, toe arms, traction rods etc or get aftermarket items

the above setup is pretty much what I now have in my R32 Gts-t although I didnt have to worry about the cables

better off with a non hicas rear subframe i.e s13 with all the 32 gear bolted on

even if you lock the hicas with a bar Ive seen a number wear out the hicas ball joints on 32's a31's

swap to the r32/r33/a31 drum style handbrake just need to use 33 cables or you can buy kits x japan off yahoo

1. yep there the same (gts-t were talking about )

2. hmm not sure on this one r200 is r200 though so should be possible

3. yes I have a non abs R32 gts-t probably more non abs than abs around in gts-t's

4. if you use a gts-t craddle yes if you use a gtr craddle no the bottom mounts are different (there forked sorta)

my suggestion as above get

new s13 non hicas craddle (or even s14,s15 Ive heard these are better)

r32 gts-t diff 4.38 ratio (use it just for crown wheel and pinon)

r32 gts-t brake setup (calipers, drum setup, hubs ,backing plates these are important as the drum setup mounts to this)

cable kit x japan or 33 cables

reuse your driveshafts, camber arms, toe arms, traction rods etc or get aftermarket items

the above setup is pretty much what I now have in my R32 Gts-t although I didnt have to worry about the cables

Great reply, lots of good info!

I was thinking the hicas lock bar might be an issue...

Mostly wanted the 5 lug, brakes, 4.36 and complete rear as a unit. But you're right it would be easier to buy those bits separately and use the s13 cradle.

I have also heard the s14, s15 cradle are superior, but from my research a s14 cradle will not bolt to s13 without some fabrication. Do you know if this is the case for the s15 cradle?

thanks again!

not sure to be honest can't read Japanese which doesnt help but there are plenty of S13's running s15 rear craddles in

Japan see if you can find any info on the was rb26 Riverside onevia now 2jz

I got a Tengoku mag featuring his car clearly showing a s15 craddle in it

To get the s15 subframe in an s13 properly you need custom offset bushes (which are available ex japan). But as stated above, it can be bolted up without them but you are depending on slack in the rubber bushes to do it and thats not good for alignment.

mello, it's pretty much a yes to all your questions, though you'd need to confirm that your current diff is an r200 and not an r180.

re the hicas vs non hicas subframe. if you lower the car with s13 subframe you will have to buy toe arms anyway which will flog out eventually. If you get a 32 one you will have to fork out for a lock bar and at some stage tierods. by the time you look at the cost of getting another s13 subframe, and an r32 diff and shafts and brakes separately and the toe arms, vs just buying an r32 subframe, a lock bar and a couple of tie rods it will probably work out around the same sort of money (atleast it would here as we have a lot of r32 stuff available).

It's the same old story, cheaper to buy an entire subframe than it is to buy all the bits separately.

Are you talking about tie rod ends or tie rods? Because there's only one person i know of thats done ends and thats t04gtr in his street/track gtr. The tie rods certainly wear out as they get old, replace them with new ones and they are good for another 150-200,000kms. the same can't be said of aftermarket toe arms

  • 4 weeks later...

use your s13 hub carrier but fit the R32 hubs and brakes to it (r33 brake cables work best) see this link i did years ago. that way you can use S13 coilovers :w00t:

http://www.nissansilvia.com/forums/index.p...;hl=5-stud+uras

stay cable with the handbrake and use URAS drum shoes form this guy in the US, http://www.uras-usa.com/index.php?main_page=index

i guarantee a better result than a hydraulic. here is some pics of the gear as i see he does not list them http://www.uras.com.au/syohin/brake.html if you get stuck we could probably send some over.

Well I want to thank all of you for your input, this thread has helped me a lot!

Turns out I found a local guy selling an entire s13 cradle, diff, axles and hubs for $50.. Too good of a deal to turn it down, so for now I'm sticking with s13 cradle. Perhaps on another car in the future I'll try the r32 setup.

URAS Interested to hear more about z32/r32 cable ebrakes vs hydraulic? I'm going Z32 ebrake for now but was planning to upgrade to a hydraulic setup in the future. Can you share some more details as to why the shoes are better than a hydraulic setup? Thank you!

good input, I've never driven a car with a hydraulic ebrake. I just don't like how much effort is required to lock up the rear on the cables (and s13 calipers) but that probably has a lot more to do with the pads and calipers than anything. That's why I'm holding off on the ebrake until I see how I like the z32 setup, the drum/shoes are much larger and have a much bigger surface area than my s13 setup... Any other input on this topic is welcome!

URAS Interested to hear more about z32/r32 cable ebrakes vs hydraulic? I'm going Z32 ebrake for now but was planning to upgrade to a hydraulic setup in the future. Can you share some more details as to why the shoes are better than a hydraulic setup? Thank you!

Z32 is the same as R33 (e-brake) so you wont have an issue providing you use the correct handbrake shoes. Decent cables are a good start as old stretched ones reduce effective adjustment. You get a very sharp engagement and it does not play with pedal feel and if set correctley uses very little driver effort to lock. we were actually the first car in australia to use hydraulic handbrakes in our driftcars but have since gone back to cable operated setups. (Cat has a hyraulic still as she sits to far forward to use the cable setup).

my old 180 had no issues locking 265 r-type tyres on 12" rims all day everyday.

post-34927-1196210049_thumb.jpg

Z32 is the same as R33 (e-brake) so you wont have an issue providing you use the correct handbrake shoes. Decent cables are a good start as old stretched ones reduce effective adjustment. You get a very sharp engagement and it does not play with pedal feel and if set correctley uses very little driver effort to lock. we were actually the first car in australia to use hydraulic handbrakes in our driftcars but have since gone back to cable operated setups. (Cat has a hyraulic still as she sits to far forward to use the cable setup).

my old 180 had no issues locking 265 r-type tyres on 12" rims all day everyday.

Where can I buy your shoes in the USA? online?

Can I ask what prompted the change back to cable setup?

Thanks for the info.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...