Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 266
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

what about the A10? 988cc, 59bhp, 82Nm... 'nuff said.

how could i forget: worlds all time greatest hero engine! :excl:

finding a gearbox to handle all that torque could be a worry though =[

Partnerships and the responses of a beautiful and enjoyable show their young LOOOOL

hmmm....

*sculls bottle of absinthe

ahh- now you make sense :worship:

bkc, i suggest you talk to Nissan and convince them with your thorough reasoning that the RB26 is better. Imagine how much money you'd save them if they dropped this new V-engine R&D nonsense and chucked a good ol' RB26 in each new GTR. They could hit HKS up for a pair of 2530s and f-con, chuck on some 555cc injectors and a fuel pump which they could get at mates rates from the boys over at Nismo and then get her over to the workshop down the road to give it a conservative tune on 1.2bar on their dyno.

Here's a short analysis of power and torque figures:

Last (R34) RB26DETT: 206 kW @ 6800 rpm and 392 N·m @ 4400 rpm. At peak power, the RB26 is producing ~290Nm of torque ie. dying in the arse.

VR38DETT: 353 kW @ 6800 rpm and 588 N·m @ 3200-5200 rpm. At peak power, the VR38 is still producing just under 500Nm of torque. ie. not dying in the arse.

The VR38 develops a lot more torque and has a far wider spread of torque. It complies with the latest, strictest emission regulations, ie. it makes this power quietly and efficiently. Nissan have spent who knows how many millions of dollars making sure this engine runs PERFECTLY, in every sense possible. No misfire, no vacuum leaks, no setting the boost controller to get rid of spiking or boost drop, the boost delivery is flat and perfect, the torque curve is massive, the power smooth and endless. A tuned RB26 doesn't even come CLOSE to standing a chance (on any count other than outright power), let alone a stock RB26.

HTH

Edited by govich
bkc is just trying to keep the value of his R34 V-spec 2 high by demonizing the VR engine.....that is, making the wild and crazy assumption that he actually has one (it's a stretch, i know)

he's probably got the 'superior' D10. :worship:

STOCK VR38DETT IS THE BETTER FROM STOCK RB26DETT I KNOW THAT !!

2009 Nissan GT-R will be priced at :

$69,850 for the base model

$71,900 for the Premium trim

Both prices include delivery charges.

Nissan intends to build just 1,500 GT-Rs per year during this model's lifecycle,

Pre-orders begin January 1, 2008

The 2009 GT-R will officially go on sale in June.

FROM SITE : http://www.r35gtr.com/forum/topic91.html

HOW MUCH PRICE GTR34 FROM 1999 TO 2002 ?????

STOCK VR38DETT IS THE BETTER FROM STOCK RB26DETT I KNOW THAT !!

2009 Nissan GT-R will be priced at :

$69,850 for the base model

$71,900 for the Premium trim

Both prices include delivery charges.

Nissan intends to build just 1,500 GT-Rs per year during this model's lifecycle,

Pre-orders begin January 1, 2008

The 2009 GT-R will officially go on sale in June.

FROM SITE : http://www.r35gtr.com/forum/topic91.html

HOW MUCH PRICE GTR34 FROM 1999 TO 2002 ?????

A new, much better car is a lot more expensive than a 5-8 year old second hand inferior car, what's your point? Did you know that you can get a VL turbo to do 10 second quarter miles for about a fifth of the price of an R34 GTR? Clearly the RB30ET is a superior motor to the RB26DETT.

VR38DETT engine Almenyun!! Engine V is only TOURQU !! Any type of engines in the form of V !! But serious or high-strength shoulder and promotion of a failed and you will soon !!!!!!

But no one will mention this fact!! It is natural because they need the profit and sales!!!

But I have a question I hope to answer is whether the new GTR him MANUAL

Transmiton 6 SPEED!! Or only F1 and Siquantial AUTO???

Thanks all .....

VR38DETT engine Almenyun!! Engine V is only TOURQU !! Any type of engines in the form of V !! But serious or high-strength shoulder and promotion of a failed and you will soon !!!!!!

The VR38 peaks at 150kW more than the RB26DETT, from factory. Please explain how this is only torque? Are you aware of the direct relationship between torque and power? An engine CAN NOT 'only tourqu', if it generates a moment about the crankshaft and it spins, it's doing work and there is power output.

What is the significance of the V layout for you? Do you know how long manufacturers have been making engines in this arrangement? It generally requires extra balancing over a typical inline arrangement, but with modern technology this is not an issue. Are you aware that dragsters that do 4-5 seconds over the quarter mile use 8 cylinders in a V-arrangement?

I give up. My head hurts.

ps. GTR is flappy paddle gearbox only for now.

Edited by govich
VR38DETT engine Almenyun!! Engine V is only TOURQU !! Any type of engines in the form of V !! But serious or high-strength shoulder and promotion of a failed and you will soon !!!!!!

But no one will mention this fact!! It is natural because they need the profit and sales!!!

But I have a question I hope to answer is whether the new GTR him MANUAL

Transmiton 6 SPEED!! Or only F1 and Siquantial AUTO???

Thanks all ....

worst. google languages. translation. yet

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Take the value it measured as, and pick the closest range available that is above the reading on the screen.   Also, no point just testing the coils. Read what has been said again. You need to test all your wiring, everything.
    • Does the scanner do all the CUs in the car, or only the ECU?
    • @666DAN sorry to bring you and old thread.     I've got my de+t done and it's all running great other than 1 small issue.    Car has remained auto with the na auto and tcm, I've used a stagea ecu with. NIstune board and everything is great other than my gear selection on the dash. It illuminates park, reverse, neutral, 3rd and 2nd when selected . But nothing when in  drive or what gear your in when you pop it into tiptronic. I'm sure there is maybe 1 wire in the ecu plug I need to move to rectify this. Do ya have any ideas?     Cheers man
    • Well I recently changed my rear axles and was thinking if I bumped anything, I have been driving the car for a while now though... But it has been raining today so everything is wet under the wheel arches. Brakes feel fine and can't hear any of the metal screamers, I had a squeak coming from one of the handbrake drums but that seems to have gone away a while ago. I was going down a hill when it lit up and I did feel the abs bite for a second and question why it did it?
    • Correct. Um. I dunno. I haven't cared enough about the way that the NA cars work to know for sure. But..... The 33/34 turbo manual cars have an electronic speed sensor in the gearbox that outputs a +/- (ie, sawtooth AC) voltage signal. That is connected to the speedo. The speedo then outputs a 0-5v square wave (ie, PWM) signal that the ECU (and any other CU on the bus) sees. The speed sensor is NOT directly connected to the ECU. So here's the problem. Your new ECU expects to see the PWM signal, but must somehow be getting a direct signal from the diff speed sensor. Which would suggest that the wiring of the NA car is not the same as the turbo cars. I think you will need to spend some time with (hopefully the wiring diagram for the car) and a multimeter to see what is connected to what. Then, presuming I am correct**, you would then want to separate the ECU speed signal input from the rest of the car's wiring, and probably either buy a speed signal converter, or build one using an arduino (or similar). That would take in the speed sensor signal and output a scaled (and suitably rearranged) signal for the ECU. ** We shouldn't presume that I am correct here, because there might be something else crazy going on. I don't think you could convert the speedo to be fed from the gearbox sensor, because the pulse rate from that sensor is probably different to the diff sensor and then the speedo would read wrongly. And this also wouldn't fix the ECU's problem either, because the ECU doesn't want to see the gearbox signal direct either (assuming that they are all on the same wiring, for some odd NA related reason, see above caveat!) Does this help? Probably not. Can you make it work? Almost certainly. With the above work. You should buy a handheld oscilloscope from Aliexpress so that you can view these signals directly. Connect up the probes and drive the car. Show photos of the screen when drving at known speeds and connected to different places, and we'll see what we can learn about it.
×
×
  • Create New...