Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys, the standard inlet manifold, plenum and throttle body are good for 450 bhp with much more even distribution than any aftermarket plenums I have tested.

For your $2K, 25GTT I would get the standard turbo ball bearing hi flowed. No fabrication required, and you should be able to do the swap over yourself with a limited amount of skill and tools.

I reckon that's a better result for your money.

  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

changing the plenum does not increase hp, thats what i thought anyways?

it's more over a increase in response from the engine, to shorten intercooler piping and to move the air easier and quicker then the space provided in the stock plenum!

adrain:p

Adrian_perth, that was my understanding too. However with my old FMIC, the plumbing was absolutely atrocious. The whole lot needed to be re-done because of right-angle bends, and the intercooler itself replaced because it was too small.

I thought I could either run a new set of pipes up and along the top of the engine, or spend a little extra and get a front-facing plenum with less pipework. Doing the latter saved me a bit of dough on 2 extra pipe bends and maybe a metre of straight pipes, so the plenum cost was slightly compensated by needing less pipework.

The front-facing plenum definitely gives me better throttle response, and also seems to bring boost on a little earlier. It can also compensate for lag created by a too-big intercooler because it reduces the volume of air in your intake tract.

A throttle body wider than the rest of your intake would only let more air in at WOT. A smaller throttle body can do the exact same job at less than WOT, just with the butterfly valve open slightly more. At WOT, if the rest of the intake is narrower you'll still be limited by the flow of the rest of the intake.

On forced induction cars throttle bodies are less important than on NA cars. The plenum chamber itself holds a supply of pressurised air for the engine and the turbo/supercharger keeps it under pressure when engaged, whereas in an NA car the engine itself has to suck all the air through a small throttle body. ie it has to do all the work on the fly as opposed to having a ready supply of air right next to the inlets on the manifold.

Putting a bigger turbo on but keeping the same throttle body on your car will do lots more for power than keeping the same turbo but putting a bigger TB on.

There is a point whereby a bigger TB will help your power, but I suspect it's somewhere over 450hp. Sydneykid has said above that the standard intake is good for 450hp and I believe him :D

I was wondering that "heated gas flows faster" may apply as well, the compressed air cooler after flow through the intercooler, it will "slower" and less acceleration, so if put on a big throttle body, it might have less acceleration, unless running more boost, just a though..please correct me if wrong..

BTW, JimX whia is "WOT", thanks

They used to have a website but I think it's been down for a few months now. They are really hard to track down if you don't know who to ask about them because they aren't in the White or Yellow pages and now that their website is down (or changed domain names without me knowing how to find it) it's even harder. Give them a call and ask them about it. If you want to see what their plenum looks like, try to find a photo of B-Man's engine bay, because he has one fitted. IMO they are very sexy!

I am currently doing the rb30/25 conversion, and will be getting a custom plenum made up with twin rb25 throttle bodies. The reason we chose the twin setup is because 2x 60 mm throttle bodies equals more than most large aftermarket TB. we can then stage them, so that it reduces lag. slightly!

the only problem i can see is a slight restriction

Originally posted by Ryno

Thanks mate, I'm wondering how one would go on a non-turbo RB30 conversion

Oh, if it's non-turbo then the bigger TB is definitely worthwhile. And also, the front-facing plenums will be a waste of time and money! You will either need to make a new air box for it on the opposite corner of the engine bay (very time consuming and tedious) or keep the same over-the-engine setup to keep the intake as short as possible.

The only reason for the front-facing plenum is to cater for front-mount intercoolers. Even if you had a turbo Skyline with the stock cooler it would be a waste of time.

Hills plenum uses the stock runners, and just plants a new chamber on the top to facilitate a forward facing TB. The intake runners are radiused, but not bellmouthed.

The acutal plenum sits quite high at the front and only just clears the bonnet - this is with stock RB25. If anything I believe it would have less underbonnet clearance than the stock plenum.

I got one of these believing it would sit a bit lower than it does, unfortunately, by the looks, I would think it would not clear the bonnet with another 3cm height:(

Get a jun or greddy plenum, or get a decent belmouthed plenum made that allows for extra deck height - wish I did.

Anyone want to buy a hills plenum?:D

Oh goody another plenum thread !

Yeah, link sometimes goes down due to dodgy webserver....

DSCF0044.JPG

DSCF0036.JPG

DSCF0042.JPG

I will be getting my Hills Plenum flow tested soon (hopefully) - It looks good - but I'm not sure about the benefit.

Steve, you got one did you ? PM me your findings.

Spend the extra and get a GReddy one - or just for get it if you are aiming for under 450HP.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I myself AM TOTALLY UNPREPARED TO BELIEVE that the load is higher on the track than on the dyno. If it is not happening on the dyno, I cannot see it happening on the track. The difference you are seeing is because it is hot on the track, and I am pretty sure your tuner is not belting the crap out of it on teh dyno when it starts to get hot. The only way that being hot on the track can lead to real ping, that I can think of, is if you are getting more oil (from mist in the inlet tract, or going up past the oil control rings) reducing the effective octane rating of the fuel and causing ping that way. Yeah, nah. Look at this graph which I will helpfully show you zoomed back in. As an engineer, I look at the difference in viscocity at (in your case, 125°C) and say "they're all the same number". Even though those lines are not completely collapsed down onto each other, the oil grades you are talking about (40, 50 and 60) are teh top three lines (150, 220 and 320) and as far as I am concerned, there is not enough difference between them at that temperature to be meaningful. The viscosity of 60 at 125°C is teh same as 40 at 100°C. You should not operate it under high load at high temperature. That is purely because the only way they can achieve their emissions numbers is with thin-arse oil in it, so they have to tell you to put thin oil in it for the street. They know that no-one can drive the car & engine hard enough on the street to reach the operating regime that demands the actual correct oil that the engine needs on the track. And so they tell you to put that oil in for the track. Find a way to get more air into it, or, more likely, out of it. Or add a water spray for when it's hot. Or something.   As to the leak --- a small leak that cannot cause near catastrophic volume loss in a few seconds cannot cause a low pressure condition in the engine. If the leak is large enough to drop oil pressure, then you will only get one or two shots at it before the sump is drained.
    • So..... it's going to be a heater hose or other coolant hose at the rear of the head/plenum. Or it's going to be one of the welch plugs on the back of the motor, which is a motor out thing to fix.
    • The oil pressure sensor for logging, does it happen to be the one that was slowly breaking out of the oil block? If it is,I would be ignoring your logs. You had a leak at the sensor which would mean it can't read accurately. It's a small hole at the sensor, and you had a small hole just before it, meaning you could have lost significant pressure reading.   As for brakes, if it's just fluid getting old, you won't necessarily end up with air sitting in the line. Bleed a shit tonne of fluid through so you effectively replace it and go again. Oh and, pay close attention to the pressure gauge while on track!
    • I don't know it is due to that. It could just be due to load on track being more than a dyno. But it would be nice to rule it out. We're talking a fraction of a second of pulling ~1 degree of timing. So it's not a lot, but I'd rather it be 0... Thicker oil isn't really a "bandaid" if it's oil that is going to run at 125C, is it? It will be thicker at 100 and thus at 125, where the 40 weight may not be as thick as one may like for that use. I already have a big pump that has been ported. They (They in this instance being the guy that built my heads) port them so they flow more at lower RPM but have a bypass spring that I believe is ~70psi. I have seen 70psi of oil pressure up top in the past, before I knew I had this leak. I have a 25 row oil cooler that takes up all the space in the driver side guard. It is interesting that GM themselves recommend 0-30 oil for their Vette applications. Unless you take it to the track where the official word is to put 20-50w oil in there, then take that back out after your track day is done and return to 0-30.
    • Nice, looks great. Nice work getting the factory parts also. Never know when you'll need them.
×
×
  • Create New...