Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

RX7 you'd have to maintain quiet a bit, justl like BoostR32 mentioned. Sure it looks hella hot, but won't be looking hot on the street if its going to be off the road at workshops all the time. I was looking at STI, RX7, Supras and GTRs before I ended up purchasing the R (33) this year, and the thing that won me was the AWD (not to my knowledge that it wasn't full time AWD lol) and petrol consumption vs. cylinders as the R is my work car (800-1000k+ km per week). Also the cabin size, which can comfortable hold 4 people with plenty of leg room for everyone.

Supra would be too easy to modify to gain performance, which is a good thing. One of the fastest Supras in WA is running 11s with STOCK TURBOS. Reason why I didn't go the Supra was because its a bit too poser spec for me, but each to their own. Supras are dirt cheap anyway, so you'll have plenty of cash left over for mods etc.

I didn't go the STI as bf of then gf's sister had one, and was getting 300km at most from his car with granny driving. I'm so glad I didn't go the STI after getting the R, as all the ones that have lined up with me have been left looking at my cooking plates at the back :angry:

Good luck with your choice, and I'm sure you'll get something you like. You looking over east for your next car? You can pick up bargains usually over there.

*Also, just check out the Supra and Mazda forums and see what people think are the good and bad things about the car, and weigh it up from there. Take one for a spin etc*

Edited by MattyP

Hard choice as there are some pretty good cars mentioned.

I would go either the Supra (96+) or R33 GTR. Supra looks sexy and as most people say they are easy to get power from with some bloody good design genetics (F40 platform some would say). The US spec supras were the best, big single turbos and wild ecu's. Interior a little dated IMO, no big change since 1993. Exterior is timeless and looks great with many different body kits. Wild rear end action with traction control off. Handling im unsure of?

R33 GTR, tuff engine, world class handling. Looks aren't as timeless as the supra, but def a nice looking car. Lots of aftermarket support, but a pretty common car (R33).

Tuff choice, go test drive 'em and decide for yourself (make sure you test drive a fair few to get a good overall POV).

PS. as for the RX7, well they do look hot (S6+), hold there value, but mechanically are a very different car. I had a S4 RX7 which spent most of its time with the mechanic or at petrol stations (they drink a lotta juice for a little car!!), very small car, really only a 2 seater, but i do have respect for them.

happy hunting :)

Realistically i think the Supra has the upper hand on this one, about the same weight of an r32gtr, but makes tremendous power and torque on stock motor. i know some guys running 10s on stock motor and semi-slicks.

The supra isn't remotely comparable to a GTR. Stock for stock it's slower everywhere. I'd compare a supra to a gtst.

It also handles like a boat. Drive both one after the other and you will find yourself thinking very little of the supra.

The supra isn't remotely comparable to a GTR. Stock for stock it's slower everywhere. I'd compare a supra to a gtst.

It also handles like a boat. Drive both one after the other and you will find yourself thinking very little of the supra.

stock supra... totally agree...

but with little mod on a Turbo 2j supra, it go a long way.....(don't waste your time on the NA too much work)

if you want 11-9s car go for the Supra... ( I would any day)...

but for every day driving or no mod. go for GTR for sure...

GTR will always be the faster drag car since it's 4wd.

Rx7 would be most fun in the corners.. light and responsive.

Supras have amazing torque with the vvt-i engine (432Nm stock i believe.. Skylines have just over 300Nm). Their drivetrain is one of the strongest around.. had i had more money probably would have bought one myself.

so yeah.. depends what you want from a car.. my suggestion is to drive all 3 and choose the one which feels right to you.

stock supra... totally agree...

but with little mod on a Turbo 2j supra, it go a long way.....(don't waste your time on the NA too much work)

if you want 11-9s car go for the Supra... ( I would any day)...

but for every day driving or no mod. go for GTR for sure...

They are as fast as gtst for similar money spent and it's still 2wd.

GTR's are known to dip into 11's on the factory turbos , driven correctly on normal road tyres. Doing this in the supra dictates the use of drag radials.

Putting the 1/4mile thing aside.

The real test:

* I recomend you go drive a good example of both. I doubt you will be singing the praises of the Supra afterwards but, if you like it more then thats what life is all about. We don't like to be clones.

The supra isn't remotely comparable to a GTR. Stock for stock it's slower everywhere. I'd compare a supra to a gtst.

It also handles like a boat. Drive both one after the other and you will find yourself thinking very little of the supra.

You comparing a tt Supra to a Gtst, common are you serious dude? Nikr33turb I think u should try out all the cars u'r interested in and then choose, also search other forums so u could get some unbiased opinions.

You comparing a tt Supra to a Gtst, common are you serious dude? Nikr33turb I think u should try out all the cars u'r interested in and then choose, also search other forums so u could get some unbiased opinions.

Compare a supra to a gtst ? Why yes...yes I am.

Both are RWD and both are about the same accelleration wise from the factory. A similar amount of money gets you pretty much the same performance in a straight line.

For a balanced sumary;

Corners?

Gtst > Supra

Stopping?

Gtst > Supra

Reverse parking?

Gtst > Supra

Looks?

Supra > Gtst

Cheaper to fix a broken motor?

Supra > Gtst (at least if you are not talking Rb20)

It appears you agree he should test drive the cars anyway.Thats something we agree on.

Bias wise I notice 99% of all your posts on this forum are stating toyota superiority as opposed to unbiased contributions.making this forum more........biased?

you're right maybe cause i have had a great experience with both cars modified and unmodified and i know exactly what im talking about when it comes to gtr's and tt supras (not n/a) i have owned both therefore i know what im on about and know their strengths and weaknesses.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well it wasn't as easy as I thought.... and it also wasn't in my original manual which I did end up finding. They discuss the process in the Nismo catalogue though and it requires slight machining. Page 145.  NISMO PARTS CATALOGUE 2020
    • I'm an idiot, my intercooler is rated for 1000hp. I had clicked on the wrong product. Knowing the delta P would be nice, but I'm doubtful I'll do it. Now as for an EMAP, that would be great and I'll get around to it eventually but from my findings in my last post, I'm considering a turbo swap now. 
    • You sir, big win tonight. Precision never supplied compressor maps in the past and Idk when they started, but it seems they only offer for a few of the older gen2's which is exactly what I have. I punched in some numbers and seem to have gone with the wrong turbo. 600-700whp isn't in the most efficient area and is close to the choke line. 800whp is well off the map. Punching the numbers into a 68mm gen2 turbo map is bang on in the center. Here I was thinking going smaller would shift the power band down, but in reality it would just make it so much worst due to my rev limit. I would have never thought. 
    • Increasing overlap will bring the torque down earlier (and make your idle sound sick lol). Worth a shot (if you dyno time) to experience a bit (providing you are confident your valves won't kiss your pistons). Is to just take off 5 degrees across the boosted area of the map, and then retard the exhaust cam let's say, 3 degrees at a time and then overlay all the runs with VCT on all the way and VCT off as soon as you make positive pressure. Ideally you would have a total of 6x overlays to looks at 0 exhaust & VCT off once manifold pressure is +ve 0 exhaust & VCT on all the way -5 exhaust & VCT off once manifold pressure is +ve -5 exhaust & VCT on all the way -10 exhaust & VCT off once manifold pressure is +ve -10 exhaust & VCT on all the way Just leave your O2 wideband closed loop on for all of the boost area & RPM, and hopefully there isn't too much fuel correction needed and the Haltech is fast enough to compensate (I do this, then apply the correction to the main table). Getting that overlay data should give you a good indication of what to aim for.
    • So, my main limitation here is that the car does not have an oil pressure sensor by default, just a switch. As part of my tune I bought an oil pressure sensor upgrade so I now have access to oil pressure levels and logging rather than just the boolean behaviour of the switch but this means I need to use the tuning app to display this value. So, this rules out using any other app on the iPad. The app will also flash when pressure drops which is a nice feature. I have replaced the centre screen with an Android one, which is awesome for Android Auto, but I think it might be too far away and out of my line of sight. I might add some gauges to it this weekend and just see. I guess if its just temp and oil pressure I can make them massive! 🤣  
×
×
  • Create New...