Jump to content
SAU Community

Points Left  

85 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

im sitting on 2 points, have been since easter when i lost all 10 in one go with a $300 chaser, got pulled over racing on double demerits haha. i shouldnt laugh, pretty bad really but oh well. only 2 and a bit years til i get some points back :(

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

So, if I were to loose my license, under 'normal' circumstances you only get a 3 month suspension?

i've been told u have the choice of two options & they r to lose the license for 3 mnths & then i believe (not 100% sure) the demerit points are cleared & u start again back at 0

or

you can choose to go on a good behavior license which allows for 2 demerits over a period of 12mnths

i dont know if these rules will apply to all states & territory's but this was the feedback for qld

No. The first time you loose it for accumulation of demerit points your get a letter in the mail saying you have 2 options:

1. No license for 3 months

2. Probation point for 12 months

if you take option 2, ie the probation option, and get caught again (ie loose you one point) then you loose your license for twice the period stated in option 1

sadly I have lost more than one friend to reckless road behaviour. But Life is a journey and for some of us that journey involves learning the hard way and tragically that wisdom sometimes comes at the expense of other peoples well being.

Hi, all. My apologies for not responding earlier. Thank you for your contribution, Mr. Keets, it was such a pleasure to read such a well constructed piece that I almost forgot where I was! I am sorry that your personal lessons have come at such a price. Perhaps wisdom does come with age, as you suggest. Or maybe at least one slows down enough to allow common sense to creep into one's consciousness - for I would not purport to display wisdom, I have merely had the blessing of good fortune to survive this long to learn from my mistakes. Which was really your point, I think.

I have been reminded just this weekend by the actions of a family member of the urges for risk-taking by young men, almost as a right of passage. But that cannot stop the old b'stards like me from endeavouring to ensure that the lesson is learnt.

I'm saddened that you are "...not particularly bothered if you want to go out and kill yourself..." If we fail to pass on the knowledge we are part of the problem....but I don’t buy it, you took the time to post your position on the subject. So good onya for caring. Now if only politicians took that kind of time we might have a solution to the death toll that doesn’t involve crushing cars and alienating our youth.

So, yes, I must care, otherwise I would not have bothered posting in the first place. (Are you sure you are on the right forum, making such astute observations and inferences?!) My point there, though, is that I would not take away from the young goat lovers their right to pursue their risk taking and put themselves at risk, but I would challenge any manner in which they do so that threatens others safety and well-being.

There is also no 'safe public road-race' except for the 'safer' official races ,on roads that are temporarily no longer 'public', like the Gold Coast Indy car/ Clipsal 500 etc... The mere fact that it's a 'public road' means that if you are unlucky in some back road in the hills you may just hit a local drivng home from shift work. You might say " what are the odds of that happening? " , well they are improved by taking yourself out of the numbers.

Rev210, I agree that I cannot argue it is safer to speed in the country than in the suburbs. But logic would support that 70 in a 50 zone is bordering on reckless, whereas 130 in a 110 on an open highway is less so. So it is not safer, but it is less reckless .... ... ... ... !! The inherent weakness in this argument is why we end up with hard and fast lines being drawn. You cannot legislate for discretion in applying the law. The law must draw a line and stick to it. So I take your point.

Which then brings us back to the boring older, wiser b'stards on forums such as this urging the young goat lovers to keep it on the track.

So having painted myself in at least two circles, when is the next track day?

Cheers. :)

Edited by MLCrisis

i have been allowed to drive for 5 years, 17 to 21 years old.

i have spent a total of 12 months of this under suspension - not driving / NOT COOL

drink driving when i was young and loss of points just recently.

when you have to walk to work with your skyline or whatever in the driveway it hits you hard

all self inflicted mind you - only my opinion but keep it on the track. i've finally learnt my lesson

i lost 10 points in under one week :D

now i need to wait 3 yrs on just one point, i was seriously considering to do a burnout in front of the cop station just to lose the one point remaining and then go the 3 months license suspension but i didnt

it sucks to be me :(

haha and you'll be even more pissed of when you loss your licience for 6months for hoon charge and once you get you licience back you still only have 1 point cause thats what happens. My older bro only had 3 points left, got hoon charged, then only had 3points once he got his licience back. It sucks testicles...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...