Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey all i drive a rb20 s13. Anyways keep the story short. i blew my turbo up a while ago.. took it to get rebuilt, and it seems that there wasnt enough oil going into the turbo.. so this means there is something wrong witht he feeding point.

I know it could be a blocked line, however im not sure, and keep thinking it could be something to do with low oil pressure. What would be causing this problem???

Anyways was wondering if anyone else knows anything about this issue, and what soughta cost these problems can bring along.

I know if its too expensive, i will just be throwing in a another rb20 for around 1500..

thanks for your help boys/girls

Nathan

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/193795-engine-problem-help/
Share on other sites

the stock turbo is Ball bearing.

and therefore has a oil restrictor in the line (or on the banjo bolt or something - can't remember)

if the turbo was hiflowed previously and a non ball bearing cartridge was used (very common) and the oil restrictor was not drilled out, then there wouldn't have been enough oil to the turbo.

if it was a stock turbo and stock everything else, it might be a good idea to just go get another stocker turbo and stock oil lines from another engine.

or if someone on here could tell you the size the restrictor should be, you could get new braided turbo oil line from someone like ENZED or PIRTEK who could put the right size restrictor on it.

the stock turbo is Ball bearing.

and therefore has a oil restrictor in the line (or on the banjo bolt or something - can't remember)

if the turbo was hiflowed previously and a non ball bearing cartridge was used (very common) and the oil restrictor was not drilled out, then there wouldn't have been enough oil to the turbo.

if it was a stock turbo and stock everything else, it might be a good idea to just go get another stocker turbo and stock oil lines from another engine.

or if someone on here could tell you the size the restrictor should be, you could get new braided turbo oil line from someone like ENZED or PIRTEK who could put the right size restrictor on it.

hey thanks for the help,

the turbo is a gcg highflow 500hp turbo, im pretty sure its ball bearing, i have a braided turbo oil line, the engine has had no problems except this.. runs so smooth..just starving the turbo.

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

finally have had the oil amount coming out of the line measured and the mate that did it for me, it's exactly the sameas his rb20, and his is running perfect oil pressure and has been running a ball bearing turbo also.

so what the hell? lol

confused?

it only ran for 3 months punching out tonnes of smoke, dammit have to wait till my mechanic gets back, anyone else have any ideas?

is it possible that higher up in the rev range all the oil is leaving the sump, and this is causing the turbo to run dry?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...