Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guy's anyone explain to me if this tune is any good, to me it's seems like a waste of power if you look at the graph the the green is Power and the red is torque the ones with dots is before the SAFC was tuned. The tune was done in 4th gear.

All my power increased seems to be from 90klms onwards, unfortunately I can't use much of it as I don't drive on the track and don't want to go alot faster than 120klms for fear of loosing my license, it looks as though I've lost approx. 40Hp up to 90klms which when your doing a redlight run is alot to loose? Anyone got any ideas what I can do about it or if this is standard fair after a tune.

DynoTune_with_SAFC2.pdf

those graphs look horrible

the bloke who tuned it surely could have done a much better job.

have you got a larger fuel pump, an adjustable fuel regulator, a z32afm and a nice clean air filter / fuel filter?

these items really help (in my opinion / experience only) when tuning a safc for 'power'

also, should have been tuned in 3rd gear (optimal - if automatic box then pull the brown fuse in front of battery, to hold 3rd), if not then 2nd gear.

got to say, my graphs with my safc tunes (4 now) have all been much smoother then yours.

but then again, dont you have poor quality fuel in Cairns?

That looks very messy mate.

With rb25 manual, 12psi, 3" exhaust, air filter, cooler and Safc you should pull around 190rwkw with a much smoother line.

Solution - Go to a workshop that knows how to tune.

Yes I would have thought so but the crap you see around 120 to 135kph is it breaking down. He replaced the plugs and it was still breaking down, so we both guessed maybe coil packs which we both inspected at different times and they look fine. Coil packs aside it seems to make good power at 205Kw I'm guessing that's ATW? But at the wrong end of the scale....especially as you see it was making 40hp up to 90kph more before the tune.

He mentioned 4th gear as bieng the standard for tuning.

It is a 5spd with a Central 20 ECU and the rest that stolen_s15 mentioned.

dyno runs are usually done in the gear that is closest to 1:1, in a 5-speed that is usally 4th.

what I meant was that if you were doing anything other than putting about, you wouldn't use the part of the rev range that the power is lower at.

does the engine feel smoother in this part of the rev range or did the tuner offer some reason for this?

Doesnt look like your engine is running very smoothly :ph34r:

A redlight run = dragging someone at the lights? If so.. you dont drag someone from 4th gear and you dont sit on low revs... so the higher rev range IS where you want your power at.

Ah I see, yes he mentioned it was from around 1000rpm to (not sure) around 6000rpm maybe? So the essentially I could break this graph up to into 5 parts from 1000rpm through to 6000rpm and the lower part upto 90Kph would be at a different RPM, if you get my drift.

Correct me if I'm wrong, I guess what I'm saying here is if the graph show'd Revs aswell it would be easier to read, so if I was in example 2nd gear that power curve that is low would be around 2000RPM in every gear? Then from around 2500RPM it's better in every gear?

Ok so I found out from the tuner that it was run from 1000RPM to 7000RPM so that would make the crossover point from worse to better around 3000RPM. The old tune is the one with the dots.

As for how the car feels, well it's made it a little sedate below 3000RPM and then it has a bootload more power from there on with a hesitation/shudder around 5000RPM then smooths out again, so I can't complain about that too much as heller44 said you don't use that part of the rev range too much other than putting around.

It kinda feels like the same problem I had when the plugs were not gapped to .7 on 12psi on my old R33 Skyline it boosted ok to around 9psi then anything after that it shuddered and that's as far as you could go until I changed the spark gap from 1 to .7 although this one seems to push past that shudder with some hisitation then keeps cranking? He put new sparks in and left them gapped at 1 so I think I'll pull them out and change the gap to .7 and see if it still hesitates, if so then need to look seriously at coilpacks.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • LOL.... a good amount of people (not all) on that continent seem to know everything and like to measure things in bananas, football fields, statue of liberties instead of the metric system lol.
    • I assume the modules are similar enough, so if you've had no issues I don't see why I would. I have tried to find a wiring diagram for the FPCM / fuel pump circuit, but I can't find it anywhere. Otherwise, I would just do some wire cutting and joining at the FPCM and give the 12 V supplied to the FPCM directly to the pump instead. If you know anyone that could help with wiring diagrams, I'd be very happy  
    • If it dies, then bypass. The task isn't difficult. I have one running on a standard R32 FPCM. That's after nearly 20 years of it running an 040, which pull substantially more current than the Walbro. They're not the same module, but I'd hope it indicates that the R33 one should be man enough for the job. I think people kill them when putting proper sized pumps on them, not these little toy pumps we're talking about here.
    • Silicone spray won't hurt anything. And if it does, that's an opportunity to put some solid steel spherical bushings in, so you can really learn what suspension noise sounds like, If you're going to try it, just spray one bush at a time, so you can work out which one is actually noisy. My best guess is that if the noise started only since putting the coilovers in, then it is just noise being transmitted up through the top mounts of the struts, and not necessarily "new" noise from bushes. But it's almost impossible to know.
    • Are you saying the 34 is SUV height, and not that we're talking about an SUV here? (because if we're talking about an SUV, you don't fix them. You just replace them when something breaks. Not worth establishing sufficient emotional connection with an SUV to warrant doing any work on one). I wouldn't jack my car up on a short little loop of 10mm steel rod poking out through a hole in the bumper bar, front or rear end. I realise that we're probably not talking about that type of loop at the front, being the one under/behind the bar on a Skyline.... but even for that one, trying to jack up on what amounts to a thin piece of steel, designed purely for withstanding a horizontal tension force, not a vertical compressive force (and so would be prone to buckling/crushing) and, my most particular bitch about it - located RIGHT AT THE EXTREME FRONT OF THE CAR, applying a load up through the radiator support panel, etc, with almost the entire mass of the car cantilevered between there and the rear wheels? Nope. Not doing that. Not on the regular. That structure out there in front of the front crossmember is not designed to carry load in the vertical direction. Not really designed to carry any load at all, really. The chassis rail that the tow point is connected to would be fine loaded in tension, as per towing. Not intended to carry the mass of the whole car, especially loaded all on one rail, with twisting and all sorts of shitty load distribution going on. No, I will happily drive up on some pieces of wood, thanks. That can only happen on driven wheels, and they are at the other end of the car, and this problem does not exist at that end of the car. And even then, I have been known to drive up on at least 1x piece of 2x8 each side at the rear, simply to reduce the amount of jack pumping necessary to get the car up high enough for the jack stands. What really really shits me about Skylines is the lack of decent places for chassis stands at either end of the car. You'd think they'd be designed into the crossmembers.
×
×
  • Create New...