Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I just want to verify that theres nothing besides AFM's that can cause the car to cut out above 4000rpm (sometimes it jerks around a bit, normally just a few loud bangs and a slowing off revving b4 i quickly back off)

Car is a totally stock r32 GTR

It used to have a missfire right up top (5000+) but it was nowhere near as bad and new coil packs and plugs fixed it (which i left standard gapped at 1.0)

For a while 1 of my AFM's was messing up and causing the car to die randomly (on freeway etc) but i checked all the solders, replaced the wiring and sprayed some carby cleaner through both and the random dying problem is gone and has been replaced by this big cutting-out (dont know which i prefer, it used to rev out ok if a little slow). I was thinking it is possibly overboosting, it's noticeably a bit faster since i cleaned out the AFM's (before it cuts) BUT it wouldn't make sense that it's overboosting now as i didn't touch anything boost related so yeh

just wanted to know if theres anything else it could be before i fork out $240 on 2nd hand AFM's (i plan on getting z32's in 3-4 months which makes it more annoying)

cheers

Edited by GTAAAH
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/194787-another-stutter-shudder-thread/
Share on other sites

do you have and aftermarket ecu or anything to monitor the afm load or voltage. one of them might be playing up and giving high (maxed out) readings causing the car to cut out.

if you don't have a way to check the voltage use a multimeter and get a voltage reading off the signal input wires at the ecu.

i wasn't sure about the .8 gap actually, i had it at .8 with the previous coil packs, but as these new ones function 100% and i was pretty sure stock gap was 1.0 i thought i should stick to that,

I don't have an aftermarket ECU or one of those console things unfortunately, i checked all the wires going into the AFM but i guess the ecu isn't hard to get to.. but how should i check them? am i just checking resistance or am i turning the car on and looking for varying voltages? i suck at auto elec stuff ;)

yeah, just check for a varying voltage. they are a 0 - 5 v signal. so you know if your at 2000rpm under light throttle and light boost (1 - 2psi) and the afm signal voltage is at say 4.8v, then its probably stuffed.

Edited by QWK32

hmm, is it possible to check this out without moving?

If not, i'm thinking: jam multimeter probes into connector up next to/touching the wires, tape probes, go for drive and get sum1 to check things out as i accelerate and look for signal in the range of (<insert signal range here>)

Does that sound right?

Also does anyone know what the wires are called or what colour they are? (i'm thinking AFM input or smtn) i'm pretty sure the workshop manual has some pretty simple diagrams of the ECU which will probably answer my question when i get home anyway, if not

Edited by GTAAAH
hmm, is it possible to check this out without moving?

If not, i'm thinking: jam multimeter probes into connector up next to/touching the wires, tape probes, go for drive and get sum1 to check things out as i accelerate and look for signal in the range of (<insert signal range here>)

Does that sound right?

Also does anyone know what the wires are called or what colour they are? (i'm thinking AFM input or smtn) i'm pretty sure the workshop manual has some pretty simple diagrams of the ECU which will probably answer my question when i get home anyway, if not

yeah, at idle they should read about 1v and at 2500rpm they should be between 1.5 and 2v. but they might not start to play up till higher revs. if the multimeter probes are too big wrap some smaller wire around them and have a long bit hanging off the end and then use that as the probe.

the afm for the front turbo is pin 35 and the rear is pin 27, also they have a total signal range of 0v to 5v

hope this helps you figure out if its the afm's or not.

Edited by QWK32

OK so they read weirdly so i bought some R33 GTR AFM's and installed them

I immediately noticed that the car was a lil rough down low but it smoothed as rev's increased

I took it up the highway and went through first 2nd and got to the top of 3rd without any fuel cuts, then it cut right up the top

From then on every time i hit around 5k it does the same cutting crap, not quite as violent, and seems to accelerate quite a bit faster with these AFM's

So anyone got any idea wat else i could try?

yo so i just bought the AFM's for nothing it seems >.<

The car started cutting out a while ago at cruising speed so i naturally thought "afm" so i sprayed it with carby cleaner and it stopped cutting out randomly but started cutting out up top

So i replace the AFM's with r33 gtr ones and it goes a bit quicker and doesn't cut once through the rev range, then starts cutting above 4/5k again

And after all that (and after regapping my plugs to .8) i notice this shit

infinite boosting ftl... i'm happy i was babying it now and only ever hit cut like 3 times haha, would have been nasty if i had kept trying ><

post-26886-1196081139_thumb.jpg

Edited by GTAAAH

Nah i only have the standard gauge which read just below 7 most of the time (but i know is innacurate) i was planning on a powerfc soonish so didn't bother with a gauge

I've only driven it like three times while it was cutting and only had it cut on me about 3 times (soon as it cut i went oh f**k and backed off) i did think it was cutting due to the AFM's though .. probably would have preferred that, lucky i didn't really drive the car much while it has been screwing up hehe

Edited by GTAAAH
yo so i just bought the AFM's for nothing it seems >.<

The car started cutting out a while ago at cruising speed so i naturally thought "afm" so i sprayed it with carby cleaner and it stopped cutting out randomly but started cutting out up top

So i replace the AFM's with r33 gtr ones and it goes a bit quicker and doesn't cut once through the rev range, then starts cutting above 4/5k again

And after all that (and after regapping my plugs to .8) i notice this shit

infinite boosting ftl

no wonder your car was cutting out, and you were getting weird afm readings, the afm's were maxed out. that probably means that your old afm's aren't buggered.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...