Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey

Thinking about putting my air box back in my car. It's a HCR32 with few mods, usual shit.

I've got an APEXI power intake on it at the moment and it runs fine, no complaints its just that now the car is a bit more cop bait due to how it looks and I don't want the hassle of defects etc

I was just wondering if air box does/will do the same job as a pod filter without causing any restrictions.

I haven't seen/read much information about HCR32 air boxes but have read a bit about ECR33 and BNR32 air boxes being quiet restrictive due to the lower section design.

Anyways just wondering if reverting to the standard air box set up with a good panel filter will do the same thing my pod is doing without losing any power/response etc

I want it to perform the same just without the possibility of a defect.

Any one had any experience?

Thanks,

Abu

Edited by abu
  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Butcher your airbox and hide the apexi power intake inside...but if you really want to go with a panel filter...open up the feeds to the airbox and i will perform just as well...

Attempted to fit APEXi power intake but thre is no way it will fit.

Its way to big. I think you can fit a HKS foam style filter or a TRUST air-inx which slight modifications to the box but they are foam based and they are a bit average quality compared to a Apexi P/intake.

Which section of the air box do you open up for better flow!?

:D

The airbox's flow pretty well, i doubt you'd see any restriction with your level of mods, you'd get less heat soak too than with pods which is always good... but no cool noises. :D

lol yeah I get a nice flutter at the moment with the plum-back pipe and BOV blocked off, but I cbf with cop trouble.

Being on P's with a very 'limited' amount of demerits left I don't want to take the risk.

At the end of the day I want it to go fast and be that little bit quieter, rather than it be slow and sound good.

Its looking like the air box will be back on tonight, and the Apexi P/intake up for sale.

Edited by abu
Attempted to fit APEXi power intake but thre is no way it will fit.

Its way to big. I think you can fit a HKS foam style filter or a TRUST air-inx which slight modifications to the box but they are foam based and they are a bit average quality compared to a Apexi P/intake.

Which section of the air box do you open up for better flow!?

:D

It will fit...i guarantee it...although the filter will be crushed ever so slightly...i know because thats on my car at the moment...

It will not really give much of a gain over the airbox for now but it does stop the cops from hassling me...and when i hit the track or strip...i just remove the airbox cover...

If you want to open up the airbox...you can open up the base and run another pipe to feed the airbox....

Edited by limpus
It will fit...i guarantee it...although the filter will be crushed ever so slightly...i know because thats on my car at the moment...

It will not really give much of a gain over the airbox for now but it does stop the cops from hassling me...and when i hit the track or strip...i just remove the airbox cover...

If you want to open up the airbox...you can open up the base and run another pipe to feed the airbox....

Oh what it does fit!?

You must have hacked it good, I lined it up and had a look if it would fit but the way I wanted it to sit it wouldn't have worked.

As you said though, I don't see it having much more gain over just a panel filter anyways, because bottom line is that its still inside the air box.

I think I will cut the bottom of the box out a little more so it catches a little more air. The air flow is pretty good from the bar to the engine bay but there is a little mod you can do in the R32s which allow more air flow into the engine bay.

I just done the opposite to what you're about to do lol. Last week i took off my stock airbox with K&N high-flow panel filter and replaced it with an Apexi Power Intake pod.

I can tell you now that i noticed a significant difference between them. With the pod it feels much more responsive and less restrictive than with the airbox, and the car definately pulls harder for sure.

I hacked at all the air feeds on my airbox when i removed my front bar for the FMIC so i could make an CAI for the box, it helped, but as i said the pod has been significantly better.

I'm not worried about the heatsoak as i hardly ever hit boost on hot days - The only downer on the pod is more unwanted attention, but as of now i'm content with my setup but i'm keeping my airbox in storage in case of any troubles.

Cheers,

Steve.

I just done the opposite to what you're about to do lol. Last week i took off my stock airbox with K&N high-flow panel filter and replaced it with an Apexi Power Intake pod.

I can tell you now that i noticed a significant difference between them. With the pod it feels much more responsive and less restrictive than with the airbox, and the car definately pulls harder for sure.

I hacked at all the air feeds on my airbox when i removed my front bar for the FMIC so i could make an CAI for the box, it helped, but as i said the pod has been significantly better.

I'm not worried about the heatsoak as i hardly ever hit boost on hot days - The only downer on the pod is more unwanted attention, but as of now i'm content with my setup but i'm keeping my airbox in storage in case of any troubles.

Cheers,

Steve.

Hey Steve

Whats going on?

Yeah I had my air box on when the car went in for compliance, and I was driving it around a fair bit. It did feel different to when I had the pod filter on originally but I don't know if that was because I had the stock exhaust on as well.

I run 12psi all day and it ran that with the air box no issues, but it feels stronger with the pod filter. Don't know if that's mentality thing though?

I have noticed in previous cars that the car ran better with the stock air box over a pod filter.

My air box sits perfect with the intercooler because it uses stock engine bay piping (return flow), no issues there at all but I will cut some of the bottom of the box out for better flow.

I think I might just try it for this week with the air box, I will notice a difference anyways since I have had the pod filter on for a quiet a period of time.

Just don't want the cop trouble man, car draws too much attention as it is because of the ride height and big cooler on the front, plus its loud with the straight through exhaust. I can get away with the rest probably just the pod is the only thing that could score me a defect.

:D

Edited by abu

old arguement this.

my personal experience is that with RB25 turbo on RB20 engine and 11 psi, pod or stock air box made no difference on the dyno.

155rwkw with both.

the main difference was in traffic etc.

the air box got no-where near as hot and the car always almost as punchy after stop go traffic as it did on the freeway.

with the pod it was heatsoak heaven making the laggy rb20 feel even doughier.

just use the stock box. Even with stock filter..

At 12 psi i really wouldn't bother so much...just whack the airbox on and open it up slightly...

I run the car at 18-19psi daily and still have the pod hidden in the airbox...

Awesome, I will open it up tonight and fit it all back in with a new panel filter.

Any hints on what to cut/remove to open it up more?

old arguement this.

my personal experience is that with RB25 turbo on RB20 engine and 11 psi, pod or stock air box made no difference on the dyno.

155rwkw with both.

the main difference was in traffic etc.

the air box got no-where near as hot and the car always almost as punchy after stop go traffic as it did on the freeway.

with the pod it was heatsoak heaven making the laggy rb20 feel even doughier.

just use the stock box. Even with stock filter..

Thats pretty much the answer I was looking for.

Appreciate all the replies.

:D

Edited by abu

i've been using the standard airbox with a cold air intake running from the front bar and feeding straight into the snorkel.

a couple of weeks back i put on a huge 6" M's K&N pod and instantly noticed sufficient lag, even with the cold air intake pipe in place. i've always been against pods because of heatsoak.

my next mission is to cut a hole with a holesaw undeneath the airbox and through the chassis, and place a 2nd cold air intake pipe there. might even replace my filter with a bit of stockings for better air intake. :D

my2c!

i've been using the standard airbox with a cold air intake running from the front bar and feeding straight into the snorkel.

a couple of weeks back i put on a huge 6" M's K&N pod and instantly noticed sufficient lag, even with the cold air intake pipe in place. i've always been against pods because of heatsoak.

my next mission is to cut a hole with a holesaw undeneath the airbox and through the chassis, and place a 2nd cold air intake pipe there. might even replace my filter with a bit of stockings for better air intake. :D

my2c!

Thanks for your reply.

My car did sorta feel more punchy with the air box, but I reckon it struggled up top. But agan I wasn't sure if that was because of the air box or the stock exhaust.

Just to add to this..

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/-t...html&st=120

go down to post 135

check engine bay and then dyno graph

wtf thats awesome!

Thanks for that mate.

struggling up top would have been the stock exhaust mate.. lol.. you'll find out why when you remove the stock dump pipe and compare it to your aftermarket choice.

Haha yeah got the turbo back on now but when I put the exhaust back on I put the pod filter back on at the same time so could never compare the differences.

Rev's nice and free now, could be a little better with a better flowing cat though but thats another story.

Anyways, I will put the air box back on tonight with a new panel filter so see how that goes.

fkn prick putting that piece of shit in!

Edited by abu

Hey Abu - I've been alright mate. Let us know how you find it with the stock airbox on without any modifications done to the box.

I guess it might not increase HP with a pod (i guess it also depends on what brand/type as there's some shoddy ones around), but for me it has definately felt more punchier, especially in the higher rpm range for some reason i have noticed (BTW, i'm still running stock boost with cat-back + FMIC).

Interesting none-the-less.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • But first....while I was there, I also swapped across the centre console box for the other style where the AV inputs don't intrude into the (very limited !) space.  Part# was 96926-4GA0A, 284H3-4GA0B, 284H3-4GA0A. (I've already swapped the top 12v socket for a USB bulkhead in this pic, it fit the hole without modification:) Basically to do the console you need to remove the DS and PS side console trim (they slide up and back, held in by clips only) Then remove the back half of the console top trim with the cupholders, pops up, all clips again but be careful at the front as it is pretty flimsy. Then slide the shifter boot down, remove the spring clip, loose it forever somewhere in the car the pull the shift knob off. Remove the tiny plastic piece on DS near "P" and use something thin and long (most screwdrivers won't fit) to push down the interlock and put the shifter down in D for space. There is one screw at the front, then the shifter surround and ashtray lift up. There are 3 or 4 plugs underneath and it is off. Next is the rear cover of the centre console; you need to open the console lid, pop off the trim covering the lid hinge and undo the 2rd screw from the driver's side (the rest all need to come out later so you can do them all now and remove the lid) Then the rear cover unclips (6 clips), start at the top with a trim tool pulling backwards. Once it is off there are 2 screws facing rearwards to remove (need a short phillips for these) and you are done with the rear of the console. There are 4 plugs at the A/V box to unclip Then there are 2 screws at the front of the console, and 2 clips (pull up and back) and the console will come out.
    • So, a bit of a side trip, but one that might be interesting for people with JDM cars and japanese head units. I know @Pac previously posted about a carplay/android auto adapter he installed which used the AUX input, and @V35_Paul put in one of the Tesla style units that replace both screens. The option I went with was a Lsait LLT-YF-VER5.87_2 (https://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/Lsailt-8GB-Android-Multimedia-Interface-for_1601187633672.html). Price was $1,150 for a single unit although they are much cheaper if you are willing to buy 2....$857ea. Make you you get the version 2 not version 1, it is faster and has a better UI - this is the manufacturer listing: http://www.lsailt.com/product/348.html. BTW if you've never bought from Alibaba before, don't be concerned....these guys can't stay in business unless they are responsive, ship fast etc, they were excellent (probably faster shipping than most local places) So, this was my task for a lazy Sat afternoon....looks complex but was all done in a few hours (it probably helps that I had some of it apart before so it was a bit familiar). I also decided to add a HD USB drive recorded at the same time and the unit also supports an aftermarket reverse cam (if you don't want to retain factory) and also AV in and HDMI out It looks much worse than it is, in fact in was genuinely all plug and play (no custom wiring at all). This video was pretty good (skipped a few steps), unfortunately they are an Aussie seller but no longer sell this unit (I guess Carplay/AA adapters are easier to install and much cheaper) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T5hJfYOB8Dg
    • That still isn't a lot to go on. I don't have a Y50 Fuga Head Unit wiring diagram. I can say that a lot of nissans of that age shared head unit plugs, so if you are in Australia something like this would probably help: https://aerpro.com/app091# You plug that into the car loom, then either plug the head unit ISO into that (if it has ISO), or you buy and ISO adapter harness that you wire in. Bit of stuffing around, but once you have ISO its easy to change things in future.
    • It is a kunfine Android screen . Does anyone know the wirering diagram of the fuga ??
    • just an update to this, poor man pays twice  Tried sanding down the pulleys but it didnt do the trick. Chucked another second hand alternator in the na car which I got for free off my mate and its fixed the squelling. Must have been unlucky with the bearings.    As for my turbo car, I managed to pick up a cwc rb alternator conversion bracket + LS alternator for 250 off marketplace, looked to be in really good nick. Installed it , started the car and its not charging the battery.... ( Im not good with auto elec stuff so im not sure if this was all I needed to do but I verified such by using a multimeter on the battery when the engine was running and I was only getting 12.2v )   I had to modify the earth strap for the new LS alternator , factory earth strap was a 10mm bolt which did not fit the bolt on the LS alternator which was double the size so I cut it off , went to repco bought some ring terminals that fit, crimped it onto the old earth strap and bolted it up to the alternator , started the car and same issue. Ran like shit and was reading 12.2 at the battery.  For a "plug and play" advertised kit thats not very plug and play but alas.  My question is , am I missing something ? Ive been reading that some people recommend upgrading the stock 80 amp alternator fuse to a 140 amp but I dont see how that would stop the alternator charging especially at idle not under load.  Regardless ive pulled it out and am going to get it bench tested by an auto elec tomorrow but it would be handy to know if ive missed something silly or have done something wrong.   
×
×
  • Create New...