-
Posts
1,125 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Feedback
100%
Contact Methods
-
Website URL
http://
Profile Information
-
Gender
Male
-
Location
Melbourne
Profile Fields
-
Car(s)
JZA80 Supra
Recent Profile Visitors
5,546 profile views
limpus's Achievements
-
East Bear Sigma Carbon Seat
limpus replied to limpus's topic in For Sale (Private Car Parts and Accessories)
SOLD!! -
Selling a rare East Bear Sigma fixed back seat...shell is FRP and CF...extremely good condition with no holes or rips...extremely lightweight (can lift with 1 finger)... Located in Melb SE and can post at buyers expense....$500 ono....PM if interested...
-
Need your opinions guys...for the same money...would you choose: 1) Toyo R888s 275/40/17 or 2) Hankook Z221 255/40/17 Tyres are going on 17x9.5" rims front and rear...are the Toyos really as bad as people make them out to be?
-
I reckon all organizers of future event should just exclude the driver if the applies to drive at their events...such behavior should not be tolerated....
-
What Intank Pump Will Deliver The Most Flow? Nismo?
limpus replied to Marko R1's topic in Forced Induction Performance
Since this discussion is ongoing...I'd like to pose a question... How much power roughly do you think a single Sard 280LPH intank pump would support on a 2JZ? I'm at 325rwkw atm on eflex but I'm thinking of turning the wick up alittle more... -
Got a mate who will be keen Troy...hang in there...will get him to PM you...
-
There there...here ya go...didn't know you wanted one...
-
We understand each other and people understand us now...moving on.....
-
Some people really don't like to be corrected....
-
Waste Gate On Standard Manifold Vs Waste Gate On Turbo
limpus replied to r34unit's topic in Forced Induction Performance
My preferred spot is off the exhaust housing too...and that way you can mount the gate at a desireable angle as well which always helps..,, So many prefer the gate off the housing but one still claims the manifold is better...I know who I'd listen to.... -
If you are talking about a slight ethanol content change then that is closer to the truth...but your initial comment said nothing about ethanol content change...it just says that richness compensates for low octane...so again...its not right...from your words it means that I can make up by for running 91 in a 98 tuned car just by richening the mixture up...now is that right or wrong? I'll leave that to you....
-
When has richness ever compensated for lower octane? I know what you are saying in terms of it being a tad safer because its richer but that statement itself is wrong...
-
Was there ever any doubt that he would screw up the start??