Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Item: R33 GTS/GTR bootlid, fibreglass with moulded bobtail wing if you want the wingless look, with a neat little wing, but don't want that ugly drop from the rear guards to the bootlid, then this is perfect, plus you'll have a second bootlid to swap between!

Age: ?

Condition: good

Price: $500

To Fit: any R33

Location: Brisbane

Contact: PM or 0402842548

Comments: The bootlid has the bolts moulded in, it is currently midnight purple and would just need a simple respray to get it to your colour. It came with my GTR and I can't see myself using it as I think I prefer the stock boot/spoiler, and its taking up space in my garage. If you want the wingless look, with a neat little wing, but don't want that ugly drop from the rear guards to the bootlid, then this is perfect, plus you'll have a second bootlid to swap between!

Can take some pics of the actual thing for anyone interested but it looks pretty similar to this setup below, but heaps better as the spoiler is moulded in and it looks alot neater.

nissan%20skyline%20rear%20drift%20wing.jpg

Edited by QIK_GTR
Can take some pics of the actual thing for anyone interested

Yep, as I said, can do, just didn't get time this morning but thought I'd chuck the ad up to generate interest today and will take some tomorrow morning to throw up!

anyone keen on this? The f/glass version of just the spoiler add on sells for about $300-400 and this way you get a spare bootlid, and a much neater moulded bobtail for a few extra $$$.

Price is negotiable as I'd like it out of my garage.

A few pics below, not the best as were taken in my garage, but you get the idea.

1234567890008.jpg

1234567890017.jpg

1234567890014.jpg

1234567890019.jpg

I can't either, the amount of people who run around wingless(with the ugly drop from the guard to bootlid), or with similar setups but not neat and moulded, I'd have thought this would have been a popular choice for people wanting to get rid of the factory wing setup!

oh well......

+ bump :D

  • 2 weeks later...

If you are keen on this and live interstate, thats fine, I'm happy to send it interstate, but you arrange pickup from my place and freight to wherever you are. Bootlid dimensions are 1200 wide x 730 high and 280 deep down the back, approx 4-6kgs if you want to get quotes.

thanks

Mate im definantly interested if you havent sold it in 4 weeks. I just have to pay for my new turbo to be installed which will be a killer. If you dont manage to sell it in that time send me a pm. thanks

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...