Jump to content
SAU Community

Pod Filter!

WOG BOY

By WOG BOY,
in General Automotive Discussion

 Share

Recommended Posts

WOG BOY Community Regular

WOG BOY

Posted
Posted

i have a S2 R33 for vehicle reference.....:i tried a pod and it made my car more unresponsive....like it had a bit of room on the accelerator that made no effect.(dont know how else to explain it)...also had some huge suction noise which i wasnt a fan of....but i did have the flutter i was after.....

could of the problem with the pod been that the connect to the AFM was not completely airsealed tight or something..or does this happen normally by making it less responsie?...any advice or answers would be awesome!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/200335-pod-filter/
Share on other sites
R31Nismoid Grand Master

R31Nismoid

Posted
Posted
so its the hot air makin the suction noise really loud and it is also makin it unresponsive?

is that what ur tryin to say?

The Air is making the noise... the fact that its hot is irrelevant

The fact that it is hot has other meaning... hot intake temps = slower car.

So put the airbox on with a good panel filter, best thing for the car... you just dont get noise.

But that can be countered by sticking your head out the window and whistling if you want, it pulls chicks all the time

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/200335-pod-filter/#findComment-3565026
Share on other sites
WOG BOY Community Regular

WOG BOY

Posted
  • Author
Posted
The Air is making the noise... the fact that its hot is irrelevant

The fact that it is hot has other meaning... hot intake temps = slower car.

So put the airbox on with a good panel filter, best thing for the car... you just dont get noise.

But that can be countered by sticking your head out the window and whistling if you want, it pulls chicks all the time

unlike u mate i dont need to do anything to attract them...:)

jus jks but i had to post it....lol

DONT TAKE IT TO HEART...

cheers for the advice tho!

if u dont like the pod sound, get a k&n panal filter and use the stock airbox.

when my 33 had this setup boosted @ 12psi i got a nice whistling sound from the panal filter.

its not really the 'pod sound' i dont like....it like it as then i get a bit of 'flutter'...because BOV's are defectable i get the chopping noise which i like better than a huge psscchhhhtt!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/200335-pod-filter/#findComment-3565207
Share on other sites
HackerX Community Regular

HackerX

Posted
Posted
since this a pod thread thought id ask my question here......

i got a cone shapped pod on my rb20 like the k and n shapped 1s, but most skyline have the mushroom/dome shaped filters, are they better then the cone or is just preferance n wat fits in the motor?

Most people would agree that the mushroom/dome shaped filters, which are normally foam filters, are worse than the paper/cotton style filters. Perhaps better flow, but they're very lacking in filtration and have a habit of coming apart and with bits of foam getting sucked into your engine if you don't replace them often enough.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/200335-pod-filter/#findComment-3573123
Share on other sites
HackerX Community Regular

HackerX

Posted
Posted
ook ok cool lol i guess ill keep the cone 1 in that case............ do the foam ones give off a different note cause my pod makes a annoying whisteling sound

Box it. This is just because the pod filter isn't muffling the noise of the turbo like the stock air box would

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/200335-pod-filter/#findComment-3574564
Share on other sites
scathing Grand Master

scathing

Posted
Posted
its not really the 'pod sound' i dont like....it like it as then i get a bit of 'flutter'...because BOV's are defectable

Whether unboxed pod filters are defectable or not (and I've heard arguments on both sides), the cops will assume it is defectable and issue you with a notice anyway.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/200335-pod-filter/#findComment-3574741
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The Bogan
      NC MX5

      By The Bogan · Posted

      Version 1 aluminium airbox is.......not acceptable No pics as I "didn't like the look.....alot" Even after all my "CAD", and measurements, the leg near the fusebox just didn't sit right as it ended up about 10mm long and made the angle of the dangle look wrong, the height was a little short as well, meh, I wasn't that confident that Version 1 was going to be an instant winner I might give Version 2 another go, there's plenty of aluminium at work, but, after having in on and off a few times, and laying in the old OEM airbox without the new pod filter and MAF, there may be an option to modify the OEM air box and still use the Autoexe front cover and filter.... maybe This >  Needs to fit in here, but using the panel, and not the pod, the MAF will need to fit in the airbox though> I'm thinking as the old OEM box and Autoexe cover that is sitting in the shed is just sitting around doing nothing, and they are relatively abundant and cheap to replace if I mess it up and need another, it may well fit with some modifications to how the Autoexe brackets mounts to the rad support, and some dremiling to move it get in there, should give me some more room for activities, as I don't want to move the MAF and affect the tune Sealing the hole it requires to stick it in the air box is simple, a tight fit and some pinch weld will seal it up tight  I am calling this a later problem though
    • Dose Pipe Sutututu
      Ethanol Content Sensor - Always at 11%?

      By Dose Pipe Sutututu · Posted

      and it ends up being already priced in as though you're just on 91RON without any ethanol. Car will lose a bit of economy as the short and long term fuel trims bring down the AFR back to stoich or whatever it is for cruise/idle for the engine.  
    • soviet_merlin
      Ethanol Content Sensor - Always at 11%?

      By soviet_merlin · Posted

      Oh, you are right. But, in Australia E10 is based on 91RON fuel and ends up being 94RON. Hence it being the cheaper option for economy cars. The more performance oriented cars go for the 98RON fuel that has no ethanol mixed in. The only step up we have left then at some petrol stations is E85.
    • niZmO_Man
      Lock up the old for sale / wtb threads.

      By niZmO_Man · Posted

      There is a warning that "this thread is super old" but they ignore that anyway...
    • TurboTapin
      Ethanol Content Sensor - Always at 11%?

      By TurboTapin · Posted

      With 10% Ethanol, we're talking 2-3% fuel consumption difference. The emissions reductions and octane boost in my opinion far outweigh this almost non existent loss.    My tanks sitting at 80%. Luckily that should go down fast as I'm on vacation again for the next two weeks. 
×
×
  • Create New...