Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey Guys

In your opinion what type of exahust should i invest in? i have a 1996 S2 N/A and i really have no idea. I want power over looks and sound but i do want o have atleast a little bit of respect when it comes to the looks and sound of the system, if you know what i mean.

So what size would give me the best power upgrade? i was thinkin a 3inch cat back right thru but seriously have no idea.

Cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/203087-which-exahust/
Share on other sites

What engine? RB20E or RB25DE?

Either way I would say a maximum of 2.5" and mild steel pipe/mufflers, not stainless. Stainless systems can sound real bad on an N/A. I run a 2" on one of my RB20DE's with three straight through glass packed resonators.

My rallycar (RB20DE) runs the same, but 2.5".

The car with the 2" pipe goes way harder than the rallycar, so a small diameter pipe doesn't hurt performace on a lil' N/A. IMO the 2" pipe sounds better too.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/203087-which-exahust/#findComment-3603303
Share on other sites

respect is earned, not given by the looks and sound of an exhaust system.

you should invest in an exhaust for the car. try to search around the naturally aspirated section on what other people have done and their results (click here to search).

if you want high peak power at high rpm, get a large exhaust. around 3.0" will do.

if you want response and a usable power band, get a 2.25-2.50" exhaust

data and information in and around the forums is readily available from other owners who've done various mods.

it's a typical how long is a piece of string question, there are so many types of systems available, hks, fujitsubo, nismo, x-force, custom systems, etc. find one you like and get it.

to get you started here are some links.

sound files of various skylines with various exhaust systems

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/so...&hl=exhaust

some threads similar to what you're asking

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Ex...&hl=exhaust

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Go...er-t188789.html

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Si...et-t184920.html

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Go...&hl=exhaust

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Ex...&hl=exhaust

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Rb...&hl=exhaust

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Ca...&hl=exhaust

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/fo...&hl=exhaust

that should answer your questions plenty. anything specifically that you can't find, feel free to start a new thread.

the following statement is not directed at you, it is a reminder to everyone posting in regards to anything.

too many 'what XXXXXX should i get' threads, put it simply if you can't put the effort to do the research for your own car then you probably shouldn't be owning a skyline. you can get advice and constructive feedback, but you can't get other people to choose for you. that's the whole point of modifying and customization - no one is going to spoon feed you.

p.s. - thread locked.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/203087-which-exahust/#findComment-3603323
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...