Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

HI guys, I will be getting my HKS GT2835 Pro S soon, just wondering, for the people that have it, does it still have that nice spool jet sound that the standard turbo provides?

You'd think it would be louder since it's a bigger turbo, am I correct???

I would hate to have it installed and it makes minimal spool noise, Id be heart broken! lol :)

cheers

And what about the flutter, I love my flutter... Will the flutter be louder than the standard turbz? I should be, bigger turbo yeh?

I would suggest a Recirculating BOV, as it will make your turbo last longer.

Also, sounds like you want attention?

Cops will love you.

This one is better:

http://users.on.net/sau/pacey.avi

Port shrouded is a "windowed" compressor cover

Looks like this:

Lol, still dont get what you mean, that just looks like a normal turbo to be that dont have a filter and not connected to the cooler...

ps. your vid didnt work :)

I would suggest a Recirculating BOV, as it will make your turbo last longer.

Also, sounds like you want attention?

Cops will love you.

F#$k recuirculating, I just wanna hear that biatch flutter.... Took of the plumb back stocky BOV, flutters real good.

So will the HKS GT2835 Pro S Flutter louder?

ANd also, will the HKS GT2835 Pro S turbz maker the spool sound yours did?

CHeers

spool will be louder than stock as the wheel is steel, your pushing much more air, and running a pod (no doubt)

all these things will make it a fair bit louder.

My old GT30 sounded like an aircraft once i plumbed the gate up :)

i've got a link for my vid somewhere, but you cant hear a lot over screamer pipes :)

This one is better:

http://users.on.net/sau/pacey.avi

Port shrouded is a "windowed" compressor cover

Looks like this:

Im about to bolt on one of those,external gate though :)

F#$k recuirculating, I just wanna hear that biatch flutter.... Took of the plumb back stocky BOV, flutters real good.

So will the HKS GT2835 Pro S Flutter louder?

ANd also, will the HKS GT2835 Pro S turbz maker the spool sound yours did?

CHeers

You dont want it to "flutter" your turbo wont last long.

lancers have mad flutterz and spool noise. Buy a lancer and its a straight fit for a triton diesel turbo to go on. Will be faster, be more cuztom, and flutter way more.

You dont deserve a nissan

Vid please! What were the specs of that motor?

ok... found it Click me!!!

GT30, 45mm gate, Nismo (factory GTS-R) manifold, RB25 (built), factory head/cams :down:

24psi/104 sunoco, thats the major stuff anyhow

ok... found it Click me!!!

GT30, 45mm gate, Nismo (factory GTS-R) manifold, RB25 (built), factory head/cams :down:

24psi/104 sunoco, thats the major stuff anyhow

GT3040?

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah i found that alot of parts can be wrong or "very" hard to get the real right one. I already bought some brakes years ago on me "old" GT calipers and they were wrong too 😄  I told them too. Even send them pictures...but they said "EBC catalogue has them on my car... So i dont know what their answer will be. I call monday them and let them know that they are really not on my car. If they were they would be already on a car...
    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
×
×
  • Create New...