Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

If you get a 3071 and front mount you'll need a pfc, personally I'd trash all that advise and go with a wicked set of blue or purple neons...............street cred is where its at.

I know, I know..................just kiddin'

Actually if you get the 3071, for the $680 I'd definitely buy the fitting kit as well.

PS I have a 3076 and it is a very good turbo, so the 3071 would be just as good with a bit more down low, I've seen guys on here claim 270+rwkw from them. They are basically the equivalent of the HKS gtrs [different ex.housing]. The HKS turbo's are made by Garrett anyway.

Turbos are for pussies.

Neons and a veilside kit bro. Set of those sick vault star chromies too. bollocksin hektik matey.

Probably want a monster tacho, too. Those chrome wheels send your engines rev limit through the roof so you'll need one that goes to at least 12.

Uleeeeeeeh.

Hola, como estas?

I have found a turbo I think would suit thhe power I am after. Does anyone have any experience with the garrett GT3071R or know a little about it??

Gracias

http://www.tweakit.net/shop/product_info.p...a038cedaaa05874

Hey Stevo,

Thats funny, I have a GT3071R on mine... Although I bought my kit for $1900.00, so the price on that link is CHEAP!

Great turbo for response and mid range power and torque... But even though it says that it is a 550hp turbo, dont expect to get more than 240 - 250rwkw using one of these as the rear housing is actually quite small (which gives you the response).

Im running 18psi at the manifold - about 20 at the turbo and mine makes 236rwkw, but the torque is the best thing about my set up as it makes over 550nm at 4,500 - 5,000 which is a great feeling and more than enough to pin you into your seat (and smoke tyres :().

Note: My car uses an A'Pexi Power FC, Front mount intercooler, big exhaust, Splitfire ignition coils, 550cc injectors, Bosch 040 fuel pump etc. you wont make as much power without extra mods if you bolt an aftermarket turbo.

I would only advise getting the 3071R if you are looking for a really quick and responsive turbo that will give great mid range and reasonable top end. If you want heaps of power I would reccomend looking at a GT3082R or something high mount, like a 3037R.

Here's a pic of my dyno tune (the car has made more power since) - have a look at the curve, there is almost no lag and the mid range is excellent.

post-17958-1205798487_thumb.jpg

G'day Mick,

That is all very interesting. How come you didn't get the GT3082R? Where is most of it power in the 3082 if the GT3071R is more mid-high range? I actually wouldn't mind more power than 240kw so maybe the bigger turbo is a better option...

If you want more power than the 3071, go for the garret GT3076 [equivalent to the HKS 3037].

My dyno results are here:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Rb...0&start=380

and 12th entry down.

The big difference with a 3071 vs any turbo that is bigger is you need custom dumps, intakes etc. So pay say $1700 for the turbo and then another say sub $5000 for setting it up.

The 3071 bolts up, and with the fitting kit, sort of uses the std set up, the 3076 may do this as well, but your throttling it and it won't see anywhere near its full potential.

The 3076 is [one of] the ideal turbo's for the 25.

If you want more power than the 3071, go for the garret GT3076 [equivalent to the HKS 3037].

My dyno results are here:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Rb...0&start=380

and 12th entry down.

The big difference with a 3071 vs any turbo that is bigger is you need custom dumps, intakes etc. So pay say $1700 for the turbo and then another say sub $5000 for setting it up.

The 3071 bolts up, and with the fitting kit, sort of uses the std set up, the 3076 may do this as well, but your throttling it and it won't see anywhere near its full potential.

The 3076 is [one of] the ideal turbo's for the 25.

So your saying for what you get out of the 3071, although lacks a little overall power still outways spending big on custom mounts to fit say the 3076 or higher?? You did mention the 3076 may bolt on but unlike to 3071 it doesnt say this on the garrett website...

Your results are very impressive man!! I'd love for you to take me for a drive one day :P:D

I personally don't know of a bolt up kit for the 3076 [there could be one, I just don't know of it]. If you did find such a kit, things like your filter, dump, exhaust, manifold etc would all hold it back a bit, you'd end up with something that is unable to work [huff] properly. I had to get all my stuff made up and it took a lot of mucking about to get sorted and settled. Its not cheap!!

This is presicely why many ppl opt for the HKS kits, they are a bolt up system. They are very $$$ to start with, but probably cost less in the long run.

I didn't do this because I had a clear plan on what components I was going to use and my goals.

G'day Mick,

That is all very interesting. How come you didn't get the GT3082R? Where is most of it power in the 3082 if the GT3071R is more mid-high range? I actually wouldn't mind more power than 240kw so maybe the bigger turbo is a better option...

The reason I didnt go for the GT3082R was because it was about $400 more expensive and I dont think youre able to use the standard air flow meter or inlet pipe (from the air filter to the turbo intake) because the extra suction sucks it closed, and the extra air mass is to much for the standard air flow meter (I could be wrong about this) so you will need an aftermarket pipe and probably a Z32 300zx AFM.

Results from different engines will always vary quite a bit, you might make more power from a 3071R than me for some reason, you dont know until you have done it. :teehee:

Dont get me wrong, the GT3071R is a great turbo, just dont expect 300rwkw +

The reason I didnt go for the GT3082R was because it was about $400 more expensive and I dont think youre able to use the standard air flow meter or inlet pipe (from the air filter to the turbo intake) because the extra suction sucks it closed, and the extra air mass is to much for the standard air flow meter (I could be wrong about this) so you will need an aftermarket pipe and probably a Z32 300zx AFM.

Results from different engines will always vary quite a bit, you might make more power from a 3071R than me for some reason, you dont know until you have done it. :/

Dont get me wrong, the GT3071R is a great turbo, just dont expect 300rwkw +

Yeah fair enough. Well im in no rush so maybe ill hold out a little longer and depending on funds choose a path that i should be able to back up with $$ if need be. Im extremely impressed with tridentt dyno figures and even though its alot more dosh it might be something worth saving up for....ill see.

  • 2 weeks later...

depends how much power you want so work out what you want.

You can make up to 270 kw at the wheels on standard injectors by upping the base fuel pressure via a adj press reg as i have done a couple now back to backed on various dynos. These setups had Adj exhaust gears, a gcg turbo at first which was rebuilt by Mrturbo with his core due to failed gcg cores,aftermarket ecu, pistons but can be done with standard as long as the tune and boost are kept to a minimum,splitfire coils.

I have also done one with standard internals using power fc, front mount, garrett turbo,adj FPR and exhaust gear which made 270rwkw and has been doing it for two years now.

So if you are only after 240 or so you can definitly make it on standard internals with just minor mods

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...