Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Is it possible to tap into the signal from the stock oxygen sensor on the front pipe to measure the air fuel ratios and tune the car?

I've seen some aftermarket gauges that apparently use the signal to report if the engine is running lean/rich but they are not reliable at all.

Is the only way to read A/F ratios to use expensive oxygen detectors at the exhaust exit?

No, any aftermarket computer will use a lambda probe (same as the standard) to measure fuel ratios. However if you disconnect your sensor from the ecu and plug it into the guage, then it will become inaccurate because the ecu needs the sensor to make fueling adjustments for part throttle, and wide open throttle. Also unless a guage gives a figure, i dont really see how its accurate... the whole rich/lean thing with a light inbetween would be no where near as accurate as a number reading.

You carn't use the standard items as they have a response curve centred around 14.7 : 1 were they are designed to work, you can buy a Jaycar kit that turns the output to a digital read out exetra like 12.8, 13.2 but they are only good for a rough idea.

Like mensioned above you need a wide band sensor which cost about $350 and a display to view, like the one link make for $400 expensive but look the part too.

Clint i got the ceramic clutch you sugested it is great!

  • 4 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
    • Yes they do. For some maybe. But for those used the most by abusers, ie Skylines, the numbers are known. The stock eyebrow height for R32/3 Skylines is about 365/375mm or thereabouts. The minimum such heights are recorded in adjacent columns in the database.
    • Hmmm, interesting. Makes me wonder whether there is bias as well. It's the cheapest fuel, so it is used for all kinds of ill-maintained shitboxes which are bound to have issues regardless. Nicer cars tend to require higher octane rated fuel and can't use it anyway. FWIW, the official NSW E10 facts page is decent. 
×
×
  • Create New...