Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm willing to swap.. has to b on the weekend though....

What mods have u done to ur Car?????

Mine is Stage 1 complete :-) over 200KW at the wheels

Ta

-SeS

Its an almost stock r34 gtt, with nismo options is all, nothing to special, was just looking for something different for the day ya know... lol

And really, insurance...pppffft

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/208549-r34/#findComment-3689815
Share on other sites

just on side note, not many people will be willing to hand over their car to someone they dont know for a day

maybe look for some for sale and go for a "joy ride", even though i hated when people did that to me lol

lol, nice point but no, would be fun but im not trying to be an ass here, i didnt think i would get a bite anyways, but had to try... thanks anyways guys

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/208549-r34/#findComment-3697071
Share on other sites

How about my R32 GTR? Plenty of rubber on the tyres still...i'll show you how to make it 2wd.

lol, tell you guys what, why dont you come along on my cruise sunday and we can have a chat, i was thinking about downgrading to a 32 next car, or a ceffy, i really really want a ceffy, did i mention i like cefiro's??

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/208549-r34/#findComment-3699907
Share on other sites

lol, tell you guys what, why dont you come along on my cruise sunday and we can have a chat, i was thinking about downgrading to a 32 next car, or a ceffy, i really really want a ceffy, did i mention i like cefiro's??

gettin a ceffy or a 32 is not "downgrading" :( i also have always wanted a ceffy, i cant wait till my dad sells his ss and gets a ceffy

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/208549-r34/#findComment-3699936
Share on other sites

gettin a ceffy or a 32 is not "downgrading" :D i also have always wanted a ceffy, i cant wait till my dad sells his ss and gets a ceffy

nah didnt mean it like that, as in year i was thinkin... sorry should have have worded better i guess...lol

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/208549-r34/#findComment-3703038
Share on other sites

lol, tell you guys what, why dont you come along on my cruise sunday and we can have a chat, i was thinking about downgrading to a 32 next car, or a ceffy, i really really want a ceffy, did i mention i like cefiro's??

haha well i think the name gives it away dude haha, but yeah i mite show up at the cruise an show you how they go 25 style haha but yeah dunno yet, plus i jus got new rims with decnt but exspensive rubber so we'll c haha

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/208549-r34/#findComment-3703411
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...