Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

haha hey chris glad to see i had some coolness/respect in your books tho lol...

im not saying sony is an excellent brand i am aware they are near the shitter end of the spectrum but im just saying dont right them off completely - for the dollar they do serve a lot of purpose.

Im a JBL man myself. And i do love my kenwood decks. Not into alpine/eclipse/fusion. Fan of RF, JL, Kicker, MTX too. Pioneers new range with their new TSD range sound EXCELLENT and you wont get a nicer sounding speaker for the dollar with their new 1702 splits.

We all have our preferences and have had good and bad experiences with diferent brands.

Hmmm ... l'd prolly say the Pana stuff is the best in the cheap range, but personally l'd only every buy pioneer or alpine. But BFYB, the pana's rate damn well. A lot of customers at work walk out with Pana stuff...though l really only sell alpine atm, just for the points! ;) (anyone who works in car audio knows what l'm talking about!!)

Best speaker for $$$ is the new JL C5 splits ... decimate everything cept their bigger brothers, and even then, for the money, the c5's are better value.

I prefer alpine decks, but when it comes to speakers its def more JL based. And amps ... well Audison, for the money, l can't go past.

Hey guys..

how hard is it to mount the amp under the driver or passenger seats. The reason i'm asking is that I'm going to install my JL Audio A4300 Amp and thinking of putting it under the seat.

How hard is it to take the seat (mind you i've got the leather/electric seat with the seat warmers) and does anyone have instructions on how so?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
    • I haven’t yet cut the chassis, maybe I switch to a reverse flow. I’ve got the Intercooler mounted as I already had it but not cut yet. Might have to speak to an engineer 
    • Yes that’s another issue, I always have a front mount, plus will be turbo plus intake will big hasstle. I’ve been told if it looks stock they’re fine with it by a couple others who have done it ahahaha.    I know @Kinkstaah said the stock gtt airbox is limiting but I might just have to do that to avoid a defect so it atleast looks legit. Or an enclosed pod so it’s hidden away and feed air from the snorkel and below Intercooler holes like kinstaah mentioned. Hmm what to do 
×
×
  • Create New...