Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys. getting back into the straight line stuff.

atm i have heavy duty billstein suspension.

they are nice and stiff and have a bit of squat in them when launching. is this good? mates have told me that this squat actually helps traction.

i only ask because i was thinking of grabbing some drag suspension...but they are hard muthers that do not squat.

so. is my billstien stuff good...or is the rock hard drag suspension the go?

cheers :blink:

*this is purely a suspension question. not a tyre/traction question

Edited by r33cruiser
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/213909-r33-drag-suspension-setup/
Share on other sites

squatting is the way to go! =D

I read in Imports Mag (skyline special edition), they actually had an article on achieving 11seond time slips. That actually the original suspension provides the best "squatting' for drag racing.

stiff suspension (like mine! HKS Hipermax D). Not the way to go, due to excess wheel spin.

Hope it helps!

hks make hipermax-drag

http://www.piaa.com.au/prod535.htm

low spring rates

high front compression and rear rebound damping, stops car from nose-diving when you change gears

low rear compression and front rebound damping helps car squat

beauty thanks for that. so soft rears and hard fronts are the go :thumsup:

Not quite.

You want no more then 3 kg/mm rear springs, around 2.5 kg/, is better. You want rear shocks with very little low frequency bump valving but a large amount of low frequency rebound damping. If the shocks are a decent brand then you can leave the high frequency valving alone. The soft spring rate allows the rear to squat and absorb the torque hit, the large amount of low frequency rebound damping holds the rear down for maximum weight transfer onto the rear tyres. The problem is you get a lot of dynamic negative camber when you get enough squat, so you need to set the static rear camber slightly positive (around 0.5 deggres). A rear subframe alignment kit installed in the "Maximum Traction" positions is also a must.

Around 3.5 to 4.0 kg/mm front springs are OK (hardly "hard"). You want front shocks with a large amount of low frequency bump valving but with very little low frequency rebound damping. Similarly to the rear, if the shocks are a decent brand then you can leave the high frequency valving alone. The limited amount of low frequency rebound damping allows the front suspension to extend therebye reducing the weight over the front and hence more effective weight transfer to the rear. The reasonable front spring rate helps to hold the front tyres onto the track, you may need to steer at some point. The front suspension geometry is pretty much irrelevant, just make sure the wheels are pointed straight ahead (zero toe) so they don't provide too much drag.

In a general sense the average Japanese aftermarket coil over kits are not suitable for drag racing and the standard suspension is better. But (there is always a "but") the problem with the rear standard shocks is that they don't have anywhere near enough rebound damping. That's when they are new, let alone 15 or so years old. So you get bad axle tramp, the kind that breaks drive shafts. The more power the car has, the worse this problem becomes. In a standard'ish Skyline (boost up, FMIC, exhaust etc) you might just get away with it (standard shocks) on street tyres. But drag radials or slicks and decent power don't mix well with poor rebound control. You will spend more money/time replacing drive shafts than you will spending the extra on buying the right shock spring combo.

Cheers

Gary

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...