Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I was wondering if i replaced the intake manifold of my RB25DE with a RB25DET manifold and got a turbo would my car run turbo???If so would the headers on my exaust work???or would i even be able 2 find headers for mine that can handle a turbo? plz help any info will do plz....

Thanx,

Ryan

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/216255-rb25de-troubles-trying-for-rb25det/
Share on other sites

I was wondering if i replaced the intake manifold of my RB25DE with a RB25DET manifold and got a turbo would my car run turbo???If so would the headers on my exaust work???or would i even be able 2 find headers for mine that can handle a turbo? plz help any info will do plz....

Thanx,

Ryan

Mate there's a bit more to it than that.

I think it would be a cheaper option to replace the current motor with a det one. You should be able to get some money back if you trade yours in too.

Easy answer is sell your car and buy a turbo model. Much less trouble, effort and better results.

Otheriwse you will need to get :

turbo

exhaust manifold

new dump/front pipe setup

intake piping

intercooler piping and cooler itself

new ecu (to run th thing)

plus a handful of other things i cant remember off the top of my head.

You will be limted in the boost you run due to the high compression of the non turbo motor. Plus other things like brakes, clutch, etc will not be up the task of sufficiently handling the new power.

But that being said it can, and has been done check this thrad for details ------- http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Re...lin-t69998.html

i did on R32 RB25DE.

it's pretty easy and in my opinion it works out cheaper than getting either factory turbo or swap for DET motor (well, it did for me - check your local market rates).

i don't think 25DE s worth much money, except for the head, apparently ppl use em a lot for RB30DET conversion.

there is a problem of legality of doing it, check your local rules and regulations first.

No idea on R34 but, apparently R33 ecu can't be chipped, but I think you can use a chipped R32 ecu to suit your set up. Also, not sure other RB25DE has provisions for oil/water line on the block. Mine did but I also talked to someone else who did it, he didnt have them on the block (I think it was off Stagea)

if you can get the whole setup off someone upgrading to a bigger turbo, it makes your life a lot easier than trying to chase this and that all over the place (which I ended up doing).

here are my parts list (most are covered by stolen_s15)

  • turbo (+ water and oil line + gaskets)
  • exhaust manifold (+ gaskets)
  • dump pipe
  • front pipe
  • J-pipe and blow off valve
  • intercooler and pipings
  • hoses and fittings for PCV & vacuum lines
  • high flow fuel pump
  • pod filter or turbo airbox (N/A one doesn't line up)
  • some fasteners (unless they come with turbo etc, if you getting a whole kit, they should. I broke two manifold studs but easy to replace em. also needed to buy turbo to manifold nuts. I don't know if it makes difference but if you buy from nissan hella expensive and they needed to get them from japan. I ended up going to a stainless fastener place and got them cheap)

and it pays to check your ignition system - coils and plugs - boost exposes defects that don't show up in N/A motor.

DE+t shaved about 3 seconds off 0-100kph time and 50-70 and 100-120 times (which i think is more practical in everyday sense) are a lot better, so definitely worth it. And this is with 9psi and a generic tune. With dyno/road tune for your specific seup it should be better.

I'm going a little bit further now, with front mount intercooler, 440cc injectors and front facing plenum.

you might want to go front mount and injectors while at it, a little more work and expense but save on tune/chipping later when you do want more out of it.

Oh, you don't need to change intake manifold.

Edited by sonoramicommando

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...