Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Indeed, i wish i could read that wack schematic they posted? What are those two different sized rings about? A multi nozzle array?...

Without trying to be a critic, i await to see what closed loop system they implement for when the espresso machine water pump, even mounted in a metal box, dies from having to pump a constantly varying water pressure loads for a few years.

On a second look at the schematic, it looks like its a setup from a jet turbine, hence the "engine water pump" at the bottom left, and the duel staggered ring shaped nozzle array.

Those pressure regulators and the surge chamber sounds pretty trick. As for triggering, i would think the regulators would take care of that. Awaiting part 2 !

AutoSpeed Water Injection System Part 2

Interesting. I do like their seemingly comprehensive testing procedures and logic.

Though it looks like they are going to position the nozzle before the air filter, claiming it'll will provide "proportional amounts of water : air"

I'm not so sure about this. The key IMO, is being able to tell the existing ECU (in AS.com's example, an OEM ECU) that the detonation suppressing system is working and to take advantage of this with more ignition, less fuel etc.

For the system to be really worth it, it should allow such aggressive fuel/ign that if the system ever failed to turn on, the motor would suffer serious det damage... this is all means, the control of water : air must be EXTREMELY tightly controlled, not "roughly proportional"

my 2 cents

Not entirely, would be pretty impressive if they run that coffee machine pump for a good few years without issue.

Also, the IC intercool spray pulled like 25% more heat from the intake charge, then WI! lol.

Proper WI in the US is pretty big. Its essentially another whole fuel system, rail, injectors, reg etc. They add a water soluble oil to the water to allow Petroleum hardware to work and not rust. They run real 40% water : fuel ratios, not the 65 ml/minute AS.com are trying.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well you could certainly buy or build an enclosure for a pod in that corner of the bay. It is absolutely vital that there is a nice big opening to let cold air in to it from the front or underside, otherwise it will just pull air in around the edges from the bay, and if that air is hot, you gain nothing from enclosing the pod. There is lots of good evidence around (including on here, see posts by @Kinkstaah for example) showing that pods pulling hot air from the bay is only a problem when you're static or slow in traffic, and that as soon as you get the car up and moving the air being grabbed by the pod cools down. Although that will obviously vary from car to car, whether there is a flow of cold air to the pod or if it all has to come through the radiator area, etc etc. Obviously, the whole exercise requires as much thought as anything else does. Doing the lazy thing will often end up being the dumb thing. The stock GTT airbox has a cold air snorkel to feed it from over the radiator. Shows that Nissan were thinking. The GT airbox is upside down compared to the turbo one, yeah? Inlet at the bottom, AFM/exit on the lid? That might make it harder to route the turbo inlet pipe using the GT airbox than a turbo one. That would probably be the main reason I'd consider not using it, not that it is too small and restrictive. I'm looking at a photo of one now and the inlet opening seems nice and large. Also seems to have the same type of snorkel that the turbo one has. Maybe all that's required is to make a less restrictive snorkel/cold air inlet, perhaps by punching down through the guard like I did.
    • Also seen this as an option 
    • I get you, we’ll see I’m aiming for 200ish kw now and hopefully 300rwkw down the line after some upgrades maybe like headstuds, E85 flex fuel etc  so trying to make it final for that now, I can get a GTT airbox for $280 so it’s not too bad but not sure if there’s better ways to spend that money. I seen online they say pod filter which isn’t enclosed isn’t good especially for a plus T.      hard to say what to do
    • Meh. How much power can you make from a +T anyway? I wouldn't have though it would be enough to challenge the airbox. It's not as if it's tiny compared with the turbo one. As to putting a pod in a stock airbox .... it's not the filter element that would be restrictive. It would be the air inlet to the box that would be the narrow point, which you could open up regardless of what element was inside. On my R32 I opened up the sort of triangular opening in the bottom front corner of the box, deformed (heated, moulded) some 4" stormwater pipe to fit to that opening and punched a 4" hole down through the inner guard to the spot where the stock intercooler used to be. This was purely in the search for a cold intake, but you could do something similar if you need to open up the inlet side of it. The AFM tube size is the same for both NA and turbo, so the outlet from the airbox is same same anyway. If you're going to do the right thing, then an aftermarket ECU won't care about the AFM (ie, you can get rid of it). But even if it was still there, people pull >300rwkW through them all day, and I suspect you won't be going there.
    • R34 RB25de Neo by the way ^ 
×
×
  • Create New...