Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

gcg said they could do a t3/4 that was not ball bearing for 1800 i think, but if you just go a stock turbo you know what youve got and even if its not right you havent spent 2g

Meggala I just got a hks t04e to put on my 32, only cost 400 and I am modding the stock manifold to take the extermal gate, do you have any info on the turbo, hp rating boost efficiency range etc, thanks.

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

hey clint its a treeible turbo you don't want it .

you will have to send it straght to me

:lol:

as for info it depends on the the a/r ratios etc.

btw I wouuld love to see pic of the manifold when done

400 hp would be a good guide talk to adam32 as he has one on his r32

meggala

its got a .6 ar exhaust and comp housing, not too big, about 59mm exhaust wheel i think.

the manifold is not as easy as i thought as there is not much room, i was going to do it like the jms onveia but there is less room in a 32 so the plate has to be angled to clear the strut tower. will take pics once its done wont be for a couple of months, as im dooing the inlet manifold as well and need to buy rx7 injectors and the wastegate.

Joel,

You know Tim at RPM pretty well so why not consider the GT28 400HP unit for RRP $2300. It has a small exhaust A/R of 0.63 so spool up should be good. 4" inlet and 0.7 A/R compressor should also give you 200rwkW easy.

All you need is the spacer for both rocker cover clearence and also adaption to the T3 flange.

Basically Tim can only do the T28 or the GT2510 which will only make around 180rwkw.

SO... I poped around a few places today found a HKS EVC which is a dual solanoid and has the rpm thingo and also a map sensor.

Then I came across a jap importers that is getting in a GT2540 next week that is from a GTR, he is splitting them as a friend of his wants one for his SR20.

I might put up with a bit of lag, it really depends if my injectors do end up being bigger than std. If so here I come 2540.

clint32,

fyi, the HKS T04E is actually rated at 500hp and would be perfect for an Rb20DET engine. a little laggier than the standard turbo but power/boost would come on quite hard.

check out the following link, it should give u all an indication of the hp ratings fro all the turbo's mentioned.

http://www.hksusa.com/categories/?id=1093

btw, a friend has a 400hp GT25 on his R32 RB20DET, along witha FMIC, unichip, and bigger pump and it's producing 222kw at the wheels on 18psi, with heaps more potential.

i guess it all depends on what u want from your car joel.

//RS500.

Joel, what turbo did you end up getting, or are you still deciding?

Have you spoke to Ben at Tilbrooks (Brains) He has a R31 wagon with a HKS 2530 on a Rb20, been in Zoom etc. That car goes pretty hard. It makes around 220 at the wheels, but being auto with 2500rpm stall, I don't think lag is to much of a problem in that car.

I think that fact remains that any bigger than stock turbo will be a bit laggier, but the trade of is consitant boost right up to the redline

I am in the process of getting **** toghether with my car for a bit of a power-up, including turbo, bigger intercooler and maybe new injectors or pressure regulator on the existing ones.

Let me know how you go

Chris

So, just how laggy are these turbos (hks 25 series) ? as i just recieved my gt2535 today and would have thought being a BB turbo and still being reasonably sized it should be quick to spool up. I thought i should have full boost by about 3500 rpm.

My turbo has a .60 a/r compressor and a .64 exhaust housing.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
×
×
  • Create New...