Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Thats true however when you live down an area such as I used to there are lots of young peoples flying around. The cops tend to then classify all people that drive a sports/v8 as a bit of a hoon so they do have an attitued when they pull you over even if you havn't done anything wrong.

I don't live down that way anymore however when I visit my parents who do live down that way I occasionally get stares from cops sitting at traffic lights etc. There are a lot of Silvia's flying around down that way.

There is now a LS1 SS commodore that they use to catch all the hoons down there as the V6's just wern't up to it.

But yer your theory is right. I guess that counts out car cruises.

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest INASNT
Originally posted by browny

On the other hand tho  - a lack of brain cells can also result in illegal mods. I bet cops and auto engineers would have some pretty good stories about downright stupid and dangerous mods people have tried.

My theory is that if you don't put yourself in the position to be harrassed by the cops (ie dont act like a tosser on the roads and dont hang out with people acting like tossers) then your chances of being pulled over are minimal.  

Also if you are civil to the cop and can demostrate that the mod is safe, legal and engineered (ie you have a copy of the certificate in the car) then you are in a lot better position to go free than someone who has a bad attitude.

I havent got to try this theory out yet tho 'cos i've never been pulled over.

that theory not not acting stupid and not being pulled over is just theory since u stated u have never infact been pulled over!!

I on the other hand have been pulled over on multiply occasions. 1'c it was 4.30am and i was on the way to work which was at 5.00am. I drop past a parked cop car at about 40 behind another group of cars doing 40 in a 60 zone. Cops c me, do a quick u turn and then pull me over at the lights, breath test me 0, check license, all points there, yet i still get a canary. Similiar thing happened again this time i turned off a freeway exit at around 9.00pm and was sitting on around 60, a cop car comes flying from atleast 1km behind me, tails me for another km and then stops me 0 breath tests me and canarys and epa's me!!

My theory is that if you don't put yourself in the position to be harrassed by the cops (ie dont act like a tosser on the roads and dont hang out with people acting like tossers) then your chances of being pulled over are minimal.

this theory of your is not realist my friend, and it will change when u get pulled over for bs and booked

Don't take me wrong though a eng. certificate if you show to the cop that has pulled you over will give you a more benifit of the doubt as he will see that you are attempting to do things the right way and make your car safe.

This has to be a plus. Even in the unfortunate circumstance that you do get sent to the pits if you engineer has done his research properly and knows what he can and can't do or has to do in order for the car to be legal and safe the pits wont be a problem and just an inconvenience.

that theory not not acting stupid and not being pulled over is just theory since u stated u have never infact been pulled over!!

Well since I haven't been pulled over, maybe I am doing something right :P...or maybe the cops here are just a bit more relaxed.

When I was in Newcastle I didn't see any cops come to think of it.

I did see a hooker at a bus stop hitch-hiking every day for the 4 days I was there. I'm trying to think the main road bit that was on as the roads feel strange over there. I stayed in a Caravan park that had little houses we hired out. There was also a Tyre joint just near it. It was also close to the sea well relatively close.

  • 11 months later...

Dont bother. I lived in WA, and a cop mate of my brother told me that - with similar mods to what you quoted.

He said that unless I go lighting up the tyres in town, or doing laps around the city or Kings park - I will never get pulled over, and I didnt.

If you do have to get a defect removed, you just pay $30 at the same time and get a permit for those mods. Its that simple. Drop MetBlueGTSt a PM, he has had his done.

  • 1 month later...

I have never owned a "standard" car in my life, every one of them has had mods. If the cops pulled me over I would argue the point, nicely of course. If they insisted, I would get the car inspected, but you don't have to do it right there and then. I always had plenty of time to change over the bits that needed changing. That's why I never sell or throw out the standard parts.

An example, I go for the inspection, the inspectors says "that's a standard airfilter, why did the police officer give you a ticket?" " I have no idea, maybe it was the sticker on it that he didn't like." Hint, I always have little things on the standard parts, a little sticker, a different clamp, a blue hose, anything that I can point to as being the reason.

I always keep the receipt from the inspection station, next time I get pulled over I show the officer the receipt. "I have already had this checked and the inspector passed it, if you make me go and needlessly get it checked again I am going to sue you for harrassment and loss of a days pay while I go. It''s your decision officer". They always back down.

The only thing you have to be careful of is cameras, never ever give them permision to take a picture of your car.

Remember it's all a game, don't take it seriously or personally and never get mad. ;)

SK thats interesting you say about cameras and photos.

A mate of mine was pulled over earlier this year, and the police dude took photos of the 'suspect' items that he wrote on the ticket. He made it very clear he was going to be passing them on around the station so they could be checked.

When we returned to the station after fixing them, he just looked at the car, 5 seconds later... yeah thats all ok buddy, thanks.... hmmm.

I dont like the photo idea

I have never owned a "standard" car in my life, every one of them has had mods.  If the cops pulled me over I would argue the point, nicely of course.  If they insisted, I would get the car inspected, but you don't have to do it right there and then.  I always had plenty of time to change over the bits that needed changing.  That's why I never sell or throw out the standard parts.

An example, I go for the inspection, the inspectors says "that's a standard airfilter, why did the police officer give you a ticket?"  " I have no idea, maybe it was the sticker on it that he didn't like."  Hint, I always have little things on the standard parts, a little sticker, a different clamp, a blue hose, anything that I can point to as being the reason.  

I always keep the receipt from the inspection station, next time I get pulled over I show the officer the receipt.  "I have already had this checked and the inspector passed it, if you make me go and needlessly get it checked again I am going to sue you for harrassment and loss of a days pay while I go.  It''s your decision officer".  They always back down.

The only thing you have to be careful of is cameras, never ever give them permision to take a picture of your car.

Remember it's all a game, don't take it seriously or personally and never get mad. :D

That's all well and good from getting out of fines etc point of view, but the reason I intend to get my project car fully certified is more of a liability point of view.

If your car has uncertified modifications which could deem it unroadworthy without an enigneers report, then what is the point of having insurance.

Last thing you would want is to smash into the back of a ferrari or be involved in a fatality with a car that was illegal to be on the road in the first place. Sure many people say thay will just bring it home and swap the parts back over, but if the car cannot be driven after the accident or a fatility and police are involved, I'd say that wouldnt be as easy and insurance companies will scrutinise your car if they have to pay out big dollars and look for any excuse not to pay up.

I would not recommend getting engineering reports done interstate if coming back to sa. I had my previous car, series 3 bluebird with a CA18DET dropped in it, engineered in nsw because i moved there for 12 months, then tried to come back to sa, and they would not except it. Wanted it engineered again here, because our laws are more stringent or some shit. End result, spat the dummy and bought a 32, because i refused to pay another $1200-$1500 to have it engineered, when it only cost me $300 in Wagga to get done.

I wanna know how interstate can have mods engineered to ADR standards....which dont seem to apply here in SA.

ADR = AUSTRALIAN design regulations

how can one state pass items regarding these standards, yet SA it costs an arm and a leg to do it. PLUS its not guaranteed REGENCY will pass ENGINEERED mods from another state. Yet they use the same ADR's to go by.....

HOW THE HELL DOES THAT WORK????????? :rant:

Remember it's all a game, don't take it seriously or personally and never get mad. :P

And act stupid! Don't know how many times claiming that I didn't know a mod had to be engineered save me from getting a canary!!

I've had my R34 fully engineered here in Coffs Harbour for $500, with a discount being given on future mods if done within 3 months between engineering. i.e $120 to engineer a pod filter, etc.

Can be an expensive exercise getting your car engineered, but not as expensive as not!!

My two cents.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Great interview on damper settings and coil selection by HPA https://www.facebook.com/HPAcademy/videos/30284693841175196/?fs=e&s=TIeQ9V&fs=e
    • Yeah, it was a pretty deep dig.
    • The values for HID colour are also defined ~ see https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2006L02732/latest/text  ~ goto section 3.9 onwards ....
    • So, if the headlights' cutoff behaviour (angles, heights, etc) are not as per 6.2.6.1.1 without automatic levelling, then you have to have to have automatic** levelling. Also, if the headlight does not have the required markings, then neither automatic nor manual adjusters are going to be acceptable. That's because the base headlight itself does not meet the minimum requirement (which is the marking). ** with the option of manual levelling, if the headlight otherwise meets the same requirements as for the automatic case AND can be set to the "base" alignment at the headlight itself. So that's an additional requirement for the manual case. So, provided that the marking is on the headlight and there is a local manual adjustment back to "base" on the headlight, then yes, you could argue that they are code compliant. But if you are missing any single one of these things, then they are not. And unlike certain other standards that I work with, there does not seem to be scope to prepare a "fitness for purpose" report. Well, I guess there actually is. You might engage an automotive engineer to write a report stating that the lights meet the performance requirements of the standard even if they are missing, for example, the markings.  
    • Vertical orientation   6.2.6.1.1. The initial downward inclination of the cut off of the dipped-beam to be set in the unladen vehicle state with one person in the driver's seat shall be specified within an accuracy of 0.1 per cent by the manufacturer and indicated in a clearly legible and indelible manner on each vehicle close to either headlamp or the manufacturer's plate by the symbol shown in Annex 7.   The value of this indicated downward inclination shall be defined in accordance with paragraph 6.2.6.1.2.   6.2.6.1.2. Depending on the mounting height in metres (h) of the lower edge of the apparent surface in the direction of the reference axis of the dipped beam headlamp, measured on the unladen vehicles, the vertical inclination of the cut off of the dipped- beam shall, under all the static conditions of Annex 5, remain between the following limits and the initial aiming shall have the following values:   h < 0.8   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   0.8 < h < 1.0   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   Or, at the discretion of the manufacturer,   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The application for the vehicle type approval shall, in this case, contain information as to which of the two alternatives is to be used.   h > 1.0   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The above limits and the initial aiming values are summarized in the diagram below.   For category N3G (off-road) vehicles where the headlamps exceed a height of 1,200 mm, the limits for the vertical inclination of the cut-off shall be between: -1.5 per cent and -3.5 per cent.   The initial aim shall be set between: -2 per cent and -2.5 per cent.
×
×
  • Create New...