Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey,

Im getting new tyres and have the oppertunity to get some Sumito HRTZ 2. In the size of 265 18s 35

To be honest ive never reali heard of them.

Anybody used them? Or had any experiance with them?

Mainly used as a street tyre, might see the track once or twice.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/225283-sumito-hrtz-2s/
Share on other sites

i got the same tyres on my rims but in 235/40/18.

They are good for what i think, havent tested them on the track yet but i'll have to see how they go.

would rate 8/10 in the dry and 7.5/10 in the wet.

next option would be the new toyo r1r's or the toyo proxes 4.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/225283-sumito-hrtz-2s/#findComment-3968432
Share on other sites

Get the HTR-ZIII if u can...they are the latest model and I've had them on my V35 for 2 months now...awesome tire in the wet and dry. There is also a very good review of them on tirerack in the US where it beats the yokos and bridgestone potenzas in a few categories...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/225283-sumito-hrtz-2s/#findComment-3975173
Share on other sites

I have just had fitted today some HTR-ZII in 235/45/17's. Will give them a couple of weeks then I will post my thoughts but first impressions is that they are very quite compaired to the Dunlop DZ 101's that they replaced, even on the rough bitumen. The guy at the tyre shop recommended them, he said that they are now made by Dunlop in Japan, they were on special at $165 each.

:P

Phil [casuarina26]

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/225283-sumito-hrtz-2s/#findComment-3992816
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Well guys I've had them on now for a couple of weeks have found them to be very good in both wet & dry weather. Have had a couple of wet nights after training so I decided to test them out on some of the bends that I go hard thru in the dry & the grip was just the same, they get of the line realy good no wheel slip, only a slight squrm on the gear change fron 1st to 2nd (was giving it a -bit). I would rate them out of 10 a 7.5-8. Very happy with my purchase.

Cheers

Phil [casuarina26]

:rolleyes:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/225283-sumito-hrtz-2s/#findComment-4051084
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...