Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

yes but once taking it out of the box it loses value immediatly. considering these phones can fetch $450 in weekend shopper and trading post etc

understandable that $375 is cheap you gotta consider you will most likely get offers around the $600 mark

Absolutely, i appreciate that the phone will lose value immediately.

It is like a new car being driven out of the lot, the values drops straight away.

But 750 to 375 is a bit much.

750 to around 600-650 is still a significant loss but i could cope with that.

  • 1 month later...

The 7250i generally gets sold on Ebay for around $600 unopened. Dick Smith sell the 7250i for $730 and they aren't the cheapest around. I think $375 for a used 7250 is a reasonable price. No one would pay $750 for a 7250.

The 7250i has a camera, and with extra features like night shot mode. The 7250i is the replacement for the 7250. It's worth more than the 7250, which has been fully superseded. There are other enhancements on the 7250i but I'm not sure of what they are.

Incorrect. I have a 7250i and it definitely has a camera on the back. It is basically the upgraded version of the 7250, NOT a downgraded version! The camera is even better than the one on the 7250 as I already said. If you still don't believe me, take a look at the Nokia site itself.

The one "without the camera" is the old 7210, which is what the 7250 was upgraded into.

JimX is right - the 7250i is the upgrade to the 7250. It offers XHTML support, improved camera functions, enhanced MMS and inbox covers. The 7250i also runs considerably faster than the 7250.

Edit: I'll offer $380.00.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hope you aren't too sore after that one, might take a day or 2 to notice yet and I guess it is a loooooong drive home. On the bright side, tube frame front end is a thing at superlap, right?
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/p/18rmVb1SKB/ 
    • The chart of front pressure to rear pressure (with one being on the x axis and the other being on the y axis) is not a straight line on a typical proportioning valve. At lower pressures there is a straight line with one slope, and at higher pressures that changes to a lower slope. That creates a bend in the line at that pressure, called the knee point. If you do not change the proportionng as the pressure gets higher, you will suffer excessive pressure (at one end of the car or the other, depending on which way you look at the proportioning action) and then get lockups at that end. The HFM BM57, from my memory of previous discussions, is based on the BM57 from a different car (to a Skyline), with a different requirement for the location of the knee point and the distribution of pressure front to rear, and so is not a good choice for an upgrade on a Skyline. Here's a couple of links to some old posts, one from here, one from elsewhere. A lot of it pertains to adjustable prop valves, but the idea is the same. There are plenty of discussions on here about this issue from al the many years of people wanting a cheap/accessible option. https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/grm/learn-me-brake-proportioning-valves/236880/page1/ https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/grm/learn-me-brake-proportioning-valves/236880/page1/  
    • Yeah dunno why johhny posted that here with no context, just post on FB/insta bro where he put it up?  Laine had an off at T4 during Thurs prac, he's ok, car is less than perfect, they are done for the weekend, he can fill in the rest. Bando also binned it like 100m up the road.   
    • I feel there must have been a FB/insta post and the weekend did not start well at all I hope everyone is all okay
×
×
  • Create New...