Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

the stereo in my stag when i got it was no good. it asked for pin code that i didnt have and no remote even if i had the code. anyhow i put the cd player from my 1600 in the stag and the speakers n splits are clear as anything at low volume. but when you turn it up its still clear and loud for about 10 15 seconds and then all speakers at once just distort badly untill you turn it right down then you can turn it up itl be clear and then distort and so on and yeah.

the head unit was fine last time i used the datto and ive pulled the trims off and speakers look fine, connections look fine. anyone got any ideas?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/225486-weird-problem/
Share on other sites

What's the wiring like?? The Japanese have a sad devotion to scotch(?) clips/joiners in almost every car they touch: maybe the wiring can't handle the load because of this? Have you checked ALL wiring between the head unit and the speakers?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/225486-weird-problem/#findComment-3971363
Share on other sites

ive lookt over most the wiring i can see, when i pulled the old head unit out there was just a huge bundle of wires there dodgy as shit. i rekon il just rewire it all. or test another speaker. and wire?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/225486-weird-problem/#findComment-3971391
Share on other sites

Start simple: if you have another speaker, fade all sound to it, and see if it does the same thing. If it does, then consider changing speakers. In what way did it look dodgy? Were there heaps of joiners, spliced wires, etc?? I generally make it a rule to rewire all stereo in a car as soon as I change the head unit: it gets rid of any crappy joins, and decent wiring almost always improves sound: factory wiring is barely adequate due to cost, and by putting decent gear in, you at least know it's been done right. :D

Use a logical process of elimination to ascertain what the issue is, starting with the easiest things tocheck, and going from there: it's the only way to make sure...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/225486-weird-problem/#findComment-3971413
Share on other sites

i dont have another headunit round and when i go out buyn stuff for the stag i always enden spending a shit load. i might have a look on the net to see if i can reset this deck that came out of it. looks like a good one. it had lcd video playn of rally cars n that, but thats all it was good for.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/225486-weird-problem/#findComment-3971477
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...