Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 177
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Nah I don't wanna drive yours to see the handling, just the 30DET (and do a burnout, jump out the door and leg it)

You don't know where I live right?

Paul, $1200

How bout I take you for a ride.. I mean.. drive :D

*shrug* stock for stock a 33 is a better prospect than a 32 but for minimal mods I believe a 32 is better (upgrade parts off later skylines to be used). For massive mods then it comes down to personal preference, I know I'd prefer to waste heaps of money on a 32gtst, but that's just me :starwars:

Unless its a GTR

32 loses in every department

This aint a war its a slaughter!

Lucky I have a 32R then... and im sure Bubba's 25/30 will pwn all.

We haz teh power & teh good looks, the 33 is the ugly fat girl with a nice personality.

No 33 vs. 32 war, its a slaughter :(

Indeed it shall! Went for a ride in an interesting car last night Tristran.. you would like :(

Can't spill too many details coz it's secret squirrel shit, but if you're up for a random spontaneous cruise this weekend, let me know :P

People who heavily modify there car like bubba i give respect

but were talkin 33 vs 32 without any drastic changes (eg engine conversions)

so yes 33 > 32 no debate! and.... 32 isnt hawt either, old interior, ghey ass bonnet bend (unless GTR) not to mention piss weak

Yeah! I gotz rezpekt y0! :P

I find the 32gtst to be a good starter as far as getting into modding cars go. Lots of cheap upgrades off the newer skylines such as 25 turbo, 33 brakes etc. Then you get into motors out of the newer skylines, I opted for a different route and built something that doesn't come standard in any car :D

Indeed it shall! Went for a ride in an interesting car last night Tristran.. you would like :laugh:

Can't spill too many details coz it's secret squirrel shit, but if you're up for a random spontaneous cruise this weekend, let me know :D

so mikes got the 32 going? ;)

People who heavily modify there car like bubba i give respect

but were talkin 33 vs 32 without any drastic changes (eg engine conversions)

so yes 33 > 32 no debate! and.... 32 isnt hawt either, old interior, ghey ass bonnet bend (unless GTR) not to mention piss weak

I've had the R33 and R32 varients of the gtst and I think there's very little in it appart from taste in car looks. Both of my cars could run low 13's with the stock turbo.

have to admit, my mate has GTS4 RB20 stock with fmic + basics, had NO balls, he's just finished RB25 conversion i havent been in it as yet, but he says its BIG improvement. he's having partay tonight will have to snap a pic/drive before too many beers.

has the look of the R32 + RB25.. ftw

I've had the R33 and R32 varients of the gtst and I think there's very little in it appart from taste in car looks. Both of my cars could run low 13's with the stock turbo.

Ive also had both r33 and R32 GTST varients

exterior can come down to personal choice but interior the 33 is light years ahead

bolt on some mods and the rb20 will be left behind

the 33 gearbox will also handle much more abuse then a r32 gearbox

another thing is stock vs stock

r32 runs 10psi r33 runs 7psi?

R32 GTST 9-12k

R33 GTST 10-14k

R34 GT-T 23-25k

34 more torquey engine compared to the 33

stronger gearbox again

larger rear turbo housing then the 33 turbo (same as a 33 turbo compressor side but with a vg30 rear housing stamped as OP6)

slightly more top end power

R34 is awesome but for money you cant go past a 33 bang for buck

so mikes got the 32 going? :O

lol yeah, when I posted that it hadn't been tuned. Went for a ride on Sunday after it was tuned and man.. that thing is fkn FAST! (just ask Tristran.. he was trying to keep up and failed miserably :sick:)

You should come for a blat sometime, need to see how it goes against a real car :ban:

Edited by bubba
lol yeah, when I posted that it hadn't been tuned. Went for a ride on Sunday after it was tuned and man.. that thing is fkn FAST! (just ask Tristran.. he was trying to keep up and failed miserably :sick:)

You should come for a blat sometime, need to see how it goes against a real car :ban:

:O Its true... awesome car, poor Matty got left back on the horizon, at least i stayed in closeish lol

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...