Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 114
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

hey gavperk i thought i knew everything about them but to be honest i cannot find anything on any BR current proceedings against Mark Pallister and anything about what you say.... could you provide details what court etc ...there were BR actions against Vanessa one of those were for school fees (Scots College) all actions were dismissed as well

I heard from office Mark in bankruptsy courts for million $ from not paying for a house and rent and school fees. lawyers chasing him big times. maybel this will do him down !
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/236437-quiktrak/page/5/#findComment-4751610
Share on other sites

hey gavperk i thought i knew everything about them but to be honest i cannot find anything on any BR current proceedings against Mark Pallister and anything about what you say.... could you provide details what court etc ...there were BR actions against Vanessa one of those were for school fees (Scots College) all actions were dismissed as well
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/236437-quiktrak/page/5/#findComment-4752484
Share on other sites

hey gavperk old news and not news at all the biggest news is happening next week

Something about a house he didn't pay for & rent he not paid. Told lawyers notices on bankrupcy arrived him recently with big bills to pay & million he being sued for Don't no more. Maybe Perth or Sydney?
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/236437-quiktrak/page/5/#findComment-4752534
Share on other sites

hey gavperk https://www.comcourts.gov.au/file/Federal/P...79/2005/actions

the house purchase was in 2004 and legal action was initiated against both Pallisters and both of them have been cleared with Vanessa cleared only in June of this year.

Whatever you say. Just know what told & papers arriving to bankrupt him Mark by person seeing them come about not paying for house
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/236437-quiktrak/page/5/#findComment-4757255
Share on other sites

hey gavperk https://www.comcourts.gov.au/file/Federal/P...79/2005/actions

the house purchase was in 2004 and legal action was initiated against both Pallisters and both of them have been cleared with Vanessa cleared only in June of this year.

Went your site. Don't look like it cleared to me. Person I talking too says lawyers papers always coming for others and this toSearch ResultsNew Search

NameFile NumberFile TitleApplicationFiling DateCourtRegistryStatus PALLISTER, MARKSYG2229/2008Phillip Baden Hearse & Anor v Mark PallisterBankruptcy 28-Aug-2008 FMCFED SydneyOpen#

Select a tab to search within that area.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/236437-quiktrak/page/5/#findComment-4759278
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi all,

Interesting reading. I am (or was) a shareholder in Quiktrak :):D .......Don't laugh I've lost a lot of hard earned money on the spin that the company put out. I held shares for a number of years. Does anybody know anything about proceedings against the company or any shareholder updates? Nothing has ever been given to us.

Thanks for your help!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/236437-quiktrak/page/5/#findComment-4795901
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

On Tuesday 17th November, Mark James Pallister has been declared bankrupt. He must resign all directorships and surrender his passport to the court appointed Trustee. He has been bought down through his own stupidity and arrogance by something small whereby he didn't read the fine print. This is no comfort to people he has ripped off, but it is a form of justice. (He has of course put money into his family trust - but bankruptcy will affect his ability to do business, travel and personal reputation seriously).

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/236437-quiktrak/page/5/#findComment-4941416
Share on other sites

On Tuesday 17th November, Mark James Pallister has been declared bankrupt. He must resign all directorships and surrender his passport to the court appointed Trustee. He has been bought down through his own stupidity and arrogance by something small whereby he didn't read the fine print. This is no comfort to people he has ripped off, but it is a form of justice. (He has of course put money into his family trust - but bankruptcy will affect his ability to do business, travel and personal reputation seriously).

I would like to say i am all for info to be put out on message boards but it should be correct and your information is not.

the matter to which you refer has been dismissed

IN THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES

COURT OF AUSTRALIA

AT SYDNEY

GENERAL DIVISION FILE NO: (P)SYG2229/2008

IN THE MATTER OF MARK PALLISTER

PHILLIP BADEN HEARSE AND ROBYN MIGNON HAYES HEARSE

APPLICANT

MARK PALLISTER

RESPONDENT

ORDER

BEFORE: REGISTRAR HEDGE

DATE: 17 November 2009

MADE AT: SYDNEY

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1. The Petition against the Respondent Debtor be dismissed.

2. The costs of the Applicant Creditor’s Phillip Baden Hearse and Robyn Mignon Hayes Hearse be fixed in the amount of $5,264.60 and paid out of the estate of the Respondent Debtor in the same priority as if a sequestration order had been made on the Petition.

3. A copy of this order be provided to the Official Receiver in Sydney within two days.

REGISTRAR

DATE THAT ENTRY IS STAMPED: 17 NOVEMBER 2009

Note:

Subsection 104 (2) of the Act [Federal Magistrates Court Act 1999] provides that a party to proceedings in which a Registrar has exercised any of the powers of the Court under subsection 102 (2), or under a delegation under subsection 103 (1), of the Act may, within the time prescribed by the Rules of Court, or within any further time allowed in accordance with the Rules of Court, apply to the Court to review that exercise of power.

Rule 2.03 [of the Federal Magistrates Court (Bankruptcy) Rules 2006] provides that, subject to any direction by the Court or a Federal Magistrate to the contrary, an application under subsection 104 (2) of the Act for review of the exercise of a power of the Court by a Registrar under subsection 102 (2), or under a delegation under subsection 103 (1), of the Act must be made by application for review within 21 days after the day on which the power was exercised. An applicant seeking a review can apply to a Federal Magistrate to waive the requirement that the application for review under subsection 104 (2) of the Act be made by application for review (see subrule 1.06 (1) of the Federal Magistrates Court Rules 2001).

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/236437-quiktrak/page/5/#findComment-4942302
Share on other sites

Always the spin hey. Come clean and admit it BANKRUPT is BANKRUPT!! Read the notice says "Mark James Pallister DOb 25.4.1965 - This person is an undischarged bankrupt". Its public records for anyone to see.

You do make me so ashamed all youve done

Doc9.doc

Doc9.doc

Edited by Justice To Others
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/236437-quiktrak/page/5/#findComment-4946238
Share on other sites

Always the spin hey. Come clean and admit it BANKRUPT is BANKRUPT!! Read the notice says "Mark James Pallister DOb 25.4.1965 - This person is an undischarged bankrupt". Its public records for anyone to see.

You do make me so ashamed all youve done

why didn't you post that in the first place and its not a free public record,you have to pay for it.

guess that leaves everyone with nothing to chase down now including the liquidator of Quiktrak Networks which is in lquidation

are you aware of any changes to the other corporate structures because Pallister is still a Director of DeadGuppy which is not allowed now and DG own the old Multitrak or Australian business with VixQuiktrak and the Australian Business has had a name change as well

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/236437-quiktrak/page/5/#findComment-4946553
Share on other sites

why didn't you post that in the first place and its not a free public record,you have to pay for it.

guess that leaves everyone with nothing to chase down now including the liquidator of Quiktrak Networks which is in lquidation

are you aware of any changes to the other corporate structures because Pallister is still a Director of DeadGuppy which is not allowed now and DG own the old Multitrak or Australian business with VixQuiktrak and the Australian Business has had a name change as well

VixQuiktrak no longer exists and VixTechnology no longer have anything to do with Quiktrak from the Quiktrak website

http://www.quiktrak.com.au/

Network Ownership

The QuikTrak network is now up and running under the new ownership of Quiktrak Security Pty. Ltd. As the new owners of this network, it is our priority to ensure the growth of this unique network and tracking service.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/236437-quiktrak/page/5/#findComment-4947068
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 5 months later...

and it is one product I WILL NOT be involved in. already spoke to a few of my customers that had the system installed and were less than impressed with it.

had quicktrak not pulled the pin and cost me a $60k council contract I may have a different tune.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/236437-quiktrak/page/5/#findComment-5322578
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Physically, you'd expect it to turn the motor 11/8ths faster than a standard one, but I'm not sure of specifics
    • Ironically the GTT was quite reliable in the 7 years of ownership. From memory I've only had to replace a radiator and coilpacks out of inconvenience 
    • Yes I can see how that would put you off HFM, especially with the price of good quality brake fluid. From what I understand it as you say the BM50 is the standard BMC for a R32 GTR, I must admit I would like to go far a Genuine Nissan BM57, but lack of cash prevents that at present. With the price being so close between the genuine BM50 and BM57 a BM57 New it seems a better choice as you gain that 1/16 bore size with the BM57, I would be interested in how much difference you feel with the BM57 fitted. I am going to take SteveL's advice in the short term and see how much actually comes out of that proportioning valve vent and save up for the Genuine Nissan part. Thanks for clarifying the HFM failure
    • Thanks mate. I just got the post inspection 1/2 done from state roads when the starter motor packed up, either that or the car alarm system is having trouble.  OEM part number 23300-AA112.
    • Hi, I though I was coming to an end in finding a replacement starter motor for a rb25de neo. I came across a starter motor from Taarks and a message below stating: Direct fit. 11 Tooth count. All below part numbers have been superseded to 11 teeth. Can some body shed some light on going from 8 teeth to 11 teeth apart from 36-month / 25,000 km warranty for passenger vehicles to 12 Month Warranty. Compatible with the following Nissan part numbers: 23300-20P00 23300-20P01 23300-20P05 23300-20P10 23300-20P11 23300-AA111 23300-AA112 23300-AA300 23300-08U10 23300-08U11 23300-08U15  
×
×
  • Create New...