Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Have not heard of or used this product but will be installing a data logger in my R33 race car soon I am useing a ruzic engineering data logger Paul the guy that makes them is in the final stage of finnishing the production model should be a verry good unit with local support and back up as well as future software upgrades. check his stuff out at www.timeattack.com he is also a user on this forum user name mountainrunner and one hell of a nice guy. I think his unit will do everything you require.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/239380-datalogging/#findComment-4182724
Share on other sites

doubt Paul's data logger has anything to do with GPS or lap timing.

I saw a thread on the same thing over at the IPRA forums earlier in the week - might be helpful:

http://www.techmasters.com.au/forum/viewto...?f=2&t=3802

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/239380-datalogging/#findComment-4183815
Share on other sites

what about the v-box mini? it looks identical to the perfomance box, but you can get a modual to put inputs from the car into it.

Not seen that before. Rpm traces tell you alot as do TPS & others. Shame no one makes it easy to tap into the few extra inputs that can add so much useful info.

Anyway the performance box is <$1000 but so is the Starlane gear too. The Starlane stuff appears to have more functionality for the dollars.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/239380-datalogging/#findComment-4183938
Share on other sites

i got my datalogit box to log front torque %, was going to get round to logging brake (unfortually the brake is a 24v switch) and steering angle. If the Datalogit had memory it would almost be perfect, cause i'm not a fan of laptops floating round the car at the track.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/239380-datalogging/#findComment-4184010
Share on other sites

vbox mini is the driftbox. performance box is the cheaper version of that without the yaw sensor. can get the performance box for $850 from Racer Industries. Its a little bit pricey for what it does in lap timing mode - lap time, up to 6 split times and speed at splits.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/239380-datalogging/#findComment-4184145
Share on other sites

Yes my Logger does do GPS and Lap Timing. Buts thanks for the usual uniformed commentary hrd-hr30. One day you will get over the AWD Shoot-out incident and stop trying to sledge me. lmao.

On a more serious note, there are a lot of loggers on the market these days and they all have their pro's and cons. Its about finding one that best matches what you are trying to achieve. For driver analysis you probably want to be at least logging; Throttle Pos, Steering angle, LatG, LongG, RPM, Speed, GPS is good for lap times and driver lines easy split times etc.

I've built my logger because I like to build electronics for cars such as my Torque Split Contoller and new Engine Monitor. I spend the extra time to make them marketable because a lot of guys who see what I'm up to want one and it also helps pay the development costs. The other thing is, when I've built the system its easy to modify it and enhance it with feedback from myself and other users. Its always nice to be able to add a feature or function when it can enhance the product.

For comparison I have loaded the current specs into the other Datalogging thread I started a while ago. These are the specs the beta system will have on release. There is a bit of detail there but as an overview:

10 x Analog Inputs (6 at 20Hz and 4 at 25Hz)

2 x Rate Inputs (RPM, Wheel Speed etc)

2 x Digital Inputs (brake pedal, clutch etc)

4 x Outputs settable as less than or greather than on any channel

GPS Input at 1Hz or 5Hz for track mapping and lap timing. This is also output to my Engine Monitor if it is connected.

Logging is done straight onto a USB key. No downloading and no memory constraints.

There is USB connection to the Laptop for configuration. (but not needed in the car as you point out sav_man you dont want to have to drive around with it)

6 of the analog channels can be used to sniff off factory or other system sensors, so no need to double up.

4 of the analog channels have build in 1K drive resistors to run sensors like Oil Pressure / Temperature which are not usually on factory cars (not good ones anyway)

I've included a serial port to connect the RaceLogger to my Engine Monitor so you can expand the logging to included all those channels also (6 more analog, 2 more rate). Plus the Engine Monitor can then display data from the RaceLogger.

Also you can daisy chain my 4WD Controller serial signal into the serial port of the RaceLogger and log the LatG, LongG and 4WD Split.

The data analysis sonftware will be an open development feeding in all ideas etc from the users of the system. I'm looking forward to seeing where we can take it.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/239380-datalogging/#findComment-4184190
Share on other sites

From what I have tried I have found that GPS based position information if much better than the accelerometer based data simply because it allows you to plot your speed trace versus distance which is much more usefull than having it versus time. It highlights the small gains you end up looking for.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/239380-datalogging/#findComment-4184210
Share on other sites

The accelerometer data is very useful when looking at oversteer/understeer for in/through/out of a corner. It really depends what your looking for, which makes up the best combination of sensors for a given analysis.

Sorry I may not have explained myself well enough. You can easilly derive acceleration data (ie lateral & longitudinal) from GPS position data. What I was trying to say was that presented graphically it is more useful when plotted against distance than against time.

It makes it easier to see what was happenning at a certain point on the track rather than a certain time into the lap.

Hope that makes sense. :kiss:

Straightforward accelerometers don't do distances well because they get messed up by hills & gradients etc.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/239380-datalogging/#findComment-4184468
Share on other sites

Yes my Logger does do GPS and Lap Timing. Buts thanks for the usual uniformed commentary hrd-hr30. One day you will get over the AWD Shoot-out incident and stop trying to sledge me. lmao.

GPS Input at 1Hz or 5Hz for track mapping and lap timing.

well laughing boy, maybe I should have been clearer. it doesn't have built in GPS fuctionality like the other units being discussed.

but it CAN log GPS and lap times, IF you connect an external GPS unit, and you can even see your lap times on the fly like any other lap timer IF you add the engine monitor.

anyway, lmao right back at ya if you actually mean what you said - lap timing at 1 to 5hz.

1hz = timing to the second

5hz = timing to 0.2 of a second

I think most people would be looking for tenths as a minimum resolution for lap time information to actually be useful/meaningful. So it doesn't really do lap timing either.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/239380-datalogging/#findComment-4184911
Share on other sites

You were never going to win the AWD Shoot-out dude. Let it go. Breath in, breath out. Drink a soothing tea. Again LMAO at your persistence at sledging me, its the funniest shyte I read on the forums. Seriously dude let it go. No one cares. Try to contibute positively to the community instead.

By the way, if you think the speed the GPS data arrives is the same as the accuracy it can lap time at, then perhaps you should keep out of the technical discussion.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/239380-datalogging/#findComment-4185692
Share on other sites

You were never going to win the AWD Shoot-out dude. Let it go. Breath in, breath out. Drink a soothing tea. Again LMAO at your persistence at sledging me, its the funniest shyte I read on the forums. Seriously dude let it go. No one cares. Try to contibute positively to the community instead.

By the way, if you think the speed the GPS data arrives is the same as the accuracy it can lap time at, then perhaps you should keep out of the technical discussion.

if you're using GPS signal to determine where the car is in relation to a start/finish line, and you only know where the car is at best every 0.2 of a second, you have a resolution of 0.2sec with an accuracy of +/-0.4sec as you have to cross that nominated start finish line twice per lap to start and stop the timing. Any times you give to an apparently greater accuracy are just approximations based on interpolation of the data - at best.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/239380-datalogging/#findComment-4186003
Share on other sites

Yea it would do. You can get 5Hz GPS for a reasonable price. You just have to decide on the precision and accuracy as well at purchase.

As I was saying above, the timing accuracy is not just based on the GPS location data. You also use the equations of motion and most also use GPS-INS techniques. Its pretty mature technology and you should look at the specs on the system as a whole and not just a sub-system of the device.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/239380-datalogging/#findComment-4193994
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...