Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi!

I went to test my 0-400 performance yesterday. Turned up the boost on my rb20. Stock turbo, intake, exhaust. Could only get around 0.9bar. More than 0.9 and it would fuel cut.

I did 3-4 runs. And came up with various trap speed.

The lowest I got was 165km/h. The highest - 180 km/h.

Car is cefiro with rb20det. 245tires in the back.

What kind of time would I get with an average 20foot time of 0.2-0.3 ?

I mean is it possible to get high 13s with my setup ??

Sorry for noob question.

And appreciate any input!

This sort of question I would normally reffer to www.realultimatepower.net

Seriously, with that car and you driving who knows. Why don't you go to the drag stip and find out? That way you can eliminate yourself from the group of tossers who sit around and theorise about what times thier cars will run with no intention of ever going to a track to find out.

After going and getting a few runs people can break down the mph and other variables and give you a better picture. In the

'motorsport section' of the forums.

Hope that helps.

sorry, guys. If there were drags here. I would pay 45 and go there. Its god damn china. They use stop-watches for measuring your time in so-called drags. Give me a break.

Any educated guess ? Like the slowest/fastest time ?

Haha.

Too many Rabbits...

ceffie, with stock exhaust and 0.9 bar boost = 14.2 if you are lucky.

mid 14's would be more correct.

especially after say first 2 runs.

that stock cooler would be nice and toasty, exhaust temps will be huge, the poor stock turbo would be about to give up.

Stock speedo and stop watches... let me guess, you are measuring 400m using your dash trip meter as well?

cause that will be absolutely accurate on a 20 year old car, not to mention one that has 245's making it even more accurate.

Ok. Thanks!

I thought so. It wasn't me who did the stop watch testing. I'm talking about the real "drag" comp here. haha.

They measure the distance, have 2 guys with radios. So when the car takes of, the guy on the other end starts the countdown on the stop watch.

Its hilarious, really!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
    • If they can dyno them, get them dyno'd, make sure they're not leaking, and if they look okay on the dyno and are performing relatively well, put them in the car.   If they're leaking oil etc, and you feel so inclined, open them up yourself and see what you can do to fix it. The main thing you're trying to do is replace the parts that perish, like seals. You're not attempting to change the valving. You might even be able to find somewhere that has the Tein parts/rebuild kit if you dig hard.
×
×
  • Create New...