Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi!

I went to test my 0-400 performance yesterday. Turned up the boost on my rb20. Stock turbo, intake, exhaust. Could only get around 0.9bar. More than 0.9 and it would fuel cut.

I did 3-4 runs. And came up with various trap speed.

The lowest I got was 165km/h. The highest - 180 km/h.

Car is cefiro with rb20det. 245tires in the back.

What kind of time would I get with an average 20foot time of 0.2-0.3 ?

I mean is it possible to get high 13s with my setup ??

Sorry for noob question.

And appreciate any input!

This sort of question I would normally reffer to www.realultimatepower.net

Seriously, with that car and you driving who knows. Why don't you go to the drag stip and find out? That way you can eliminate yourself from the group of tossers who sit around and theorise about what times thier cars will run with no intention of ever going to a track to find out.

After going and getting a few runs people can break down the mph and other variables and give you a better picture. In the

'motorsport section' of the forums.

Hope that helps.

sorry, guys. If there were drags here. I would pay 45 and go there. Its god damn china. They use stop-watches for measuring your time in so-called drags. Give me a break.

Any educated guess ? Like the slowest/fastest time ?

Haha.

Too many Rabbits...

ceffie, with stock exhaust and 0.9 bar boost = 14.2 if you are lucky.

mid 14's would be more correct.

especially after say first 2 runs.

that stock cooler would be nice and toasty, exhaust temps will be huge, the poor stock turbo would be about to give up.

Stock speedo and stop watches... let me guess, you are measuring 400m using your dash trip meter as well?

cause that will be absolutely accurate on a 20 year old car, not to mention one that has 245's making it even more accurate.

Ok. Thanks!

I thought so. It wasn't me who did the stop watch testing. I'm talking about the real "drag" comp here. haha.

They measure the distance, have 2 guys with radios. So when the car takes of, the guy on the other end starts the countdown on the stop watch.

Its hilarious, really!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
×
×
  • Create New...