Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys, i have R33 gtst 95 model, rb25det engine, anyway car is basicly stock turbo, stock computer, has 3" turbo back exhuast, greddy fmic, avcr b/c, split fire coilpacks, walbro 255L fuel pump installed, now if im travelling along at 60km/h drop it back to 3rd or 2nd and flatten it, goes through the rev range fine until it gets to 5000rpm then it feels like it drops off power until about 6000 rpm then comes on full power again until redline at 7200rpm, now i dont know much about the avcr i have it set up on self learn mode, i have been told that its not the best way to run it, but i just got it set up so it goes to all stars and left it so it was safe, running 10psi which is about right with what a standard car would run with ungraded exhaust on it. still does has this problem at that boost. any ideas??

Cheers

Daz

my car does this aswell

but mine is a r34 gtt auto and doesnt have the mods you do, pretty much stock.

revs up smoothly till it gets to about 5k

although depends what gear its in. 1st and 2nd gear revs all the way smoothly. this happens in 3rd and 4th

also curious to find out what causes this...

plugs are gapped down to 0.8mm, unless they have opened up in the last 3000km since i changed them at my last service, and also

The R+R thing seems to be what its doing, but on the avcr it wont drop boost below 10psi coz that's what it runs standard now with the exhaust and extra flow. i have got it running pretty much the lowest boost it will with the standard wastegate.

Either get a safc II as a cheap fix so you can trick the AFM readings so it won't drop in to R&R, or go the half hog and get a piggy back ECU or go the full hog and get a replacement ECU and get it tuned.

Getting it tuned will change the way you car feels. It's worth the dosh

I have a power fc sitting here ready to go in, but was going to wait till i got bigger turbo and injectors first. so dont wanna get it tuned yet. the thing is it never really did this before i had fmic and avcr and fuel pump installed, so its gotta be one of these things that are causing it to do that.

Yes, well a tune will fix your problem though. Your standard ECU is having trouble trying to manage all these new changes you've added to the car, its freaking out and trying to play it safe at the expense of your fuel and performance.

i have the same problem on my r34 neo gtt b4 but mine is totally stock in the hood but same with you its cutting from 5k -6k then goes smooth from there. my problem was the spacings on my plugs, when me and tony took it out and put new 1's in with the .8 spacings problems went away.

i have the same problem on my r34 neo gtt b4 but mine is totally stock in the hood but same with you its cutting from 5k -6k then goes smooth from there. my problem was the spacings on my plugs, when me and tony took it out and put new 1's in with the .8 spacings problems went away.

thanx for that. i will be replacing the plugs again soon. so il post in here if its fixes the problem. i actually have coppers in there at the moment and gapped them down to 0.8 , they have only been in for 3000KM but i will put the iridiums back in maybe this weekend, see if its changes it at all. the gaps on the coppers might have opened up in that 3000KM and could be causing the problems.

noob question but how do you "gap" them?

well, when u buy plugs they come with a different gap sizings between where the tip of the plug is where it arks to, you have to get some feeler gauges, which come in different size gaps you put them in between where the tip is and where it arks out on the plug and tap the plug gently against a bench or something so that the gap will decrese in size to the size of the gauge. that makes it easier for the spark to travel across the distance bcoz its not as far for the spark to travel. normal copper plugs u buy are usually about 1.1mm gap, the iridiums are already gapped down to a 0.8mm so you shouldnt need to touch them.

well, when u buy plugs they come with a different gap sizings between where the tip of the plug is where it arks to, you have to get some feeler gauges, which come in different size gaps you put them in between where the tip is and where it arks out on the plug and tap the plug gently against a bench or something so that the gap will decrese in size to the size of the gauge. that makes it easier for the spark to travel across the distance bcoz its not as far for the spark to travel. normal copper plugs u buy are usually about 1.1mm gap, the iridiums are already gapped down to a 0.8mm so you shouldnt need to touch them.

Well you can buy them pre gapped. Iridiums do come as a 1.1mm. So if you want .8's you buy .8's, if you want 1.1's you buy 1.1's.

Well you can buy them pre gapped. Iridiums do come as a 1.1mm. So if you want .8's you buy .8's, if you want 1.1's you buy 1.1's.

yeah u are right i think. lol but i really have never bought 1.1 for my car in iridiums, not really worth it in turbo cars.

yeah u are right i think. lol but i really have never bought 1.1 for my car in iridiums, not really worth it in turbo cars.

yeah I bought 1.1's for mine and haven't experienced a problem with them. But for everybody else, may as well just cut the crap and go for .8's. Spark plug gap arguments are another topic by itself so I won't raise it in here :P

Well today i got to and managed to change the plugs back to my iridiums from the coppers i had in there gapped down to 0.8, and now that the iridiums have been sandblasted and cleaned by me at work, there like new again, and work great. rev's all the way through the rev range now without hesitation, cheers guys, i had a feeling it might have somehting to do with the copper plugs. but seriously they were only in for 3000km and the gaps must have increased or something, i thought they woudl have atleast lasted the 5000km but turns out they didnt, but they plugs werent that dirty either.

I had the exact same problem in my 33. The car feels like it bogs down in that rpm range (feels like going through wet sand or something), so i purcahsed power fc, got it tuned and it now runs great, pulls hard all the way to redline!!! Your pretty lucky that it was plugs, it wouldve saved me a lot of money if it was the problem with mine!!

Edited by RB JET

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...