Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey,

i havestill got it set on stock boost, and its now backfiringand around 4500 rpm. Its not really loud but its enough to make the car feel like its surging. I have a bosch 040 fuel pump, i run it on mobile fuel. Premium stuff.

I also got the oil to air seperator installed. Now for this, the hose which normally runs from the cam cover into theinduction hose, has been blocked off. Now when starting the car up, it goes to about 700 rpm then drops down to where its about to stall then back up to about 500 rpm. And it sounds like it is idling really low. When oil to air seperators are used do people still keep the air circulating into the rubber induction hose? (its goes in just before the turbo)

And secondly i am going to install the plumb back Bov back on. For this to work it has to be as close to the throttle body as possible. In my case that is going to mean it will be on the otherside of the engine bay to where its going to have to be plumbed into.

Cause i have the front facing plenum. So do i have to run a really really long hose into the rubber induction pipe inbetween the air flow metre and turbo? or can i plumb it in somewhere else.

At the moment the rubber hose that used to go onto the crossover pipe, is being sent to the rubber induction pipe. This hose comes from the back of the plenum....

should this hose that i have sent to the induction pipe be going into the cooler piping, before the throttle body? and then run the plumb back bov to the induction hose instead?

its a little confusing, so many hoses can effect how the car revs, idles, etc.

This could be the cause of the backfiring aswell.

if someone could take the time to point me in the right direction it would be good. E.g someone with a front facing plenum, and a plumb back bov?

thanks

p.s

for an rb25

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/24259-backfiring-on-stock-boost/
Share on other sites

for anyone who has been bothered to read my long boring post....

i have done a search and have come across guys with the problems. Most people are talking about air flow metres, fuel cut, boost cut, needing an safc, or even a aftermarket ecu....

i am a bit confused about it all now.

one more thing, i also have the hose from actuator going up to the plenum. I dont have it plumbed into the cooler piping like from factory..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...