Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

knowledgeable?

lol ok :banana:

1 turbo = 10 makes all the sense in the world :)

what he says makes sense.. sorta.. but every turbo flows different amounts of air. n thats a fact..

1 single = x amount of power

2 of the same x = alot more power...

if it wasnt the case, then ud use just 1 turbo to get every job done

Edited by Bumblebee
  • Replies 49
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

WRRR is right.

PSI = Pressure per square inch

This is a measurement of how much air per square inch is in the plenum.

The Plenum will not change no matter how many turbos a car has.

The reason 1 GTR turbo cant make the same power as 2 is because it is because it cannot move enough air fast enough to reach the desired power level.

You are right in saying that volume is important. However, 12 psi is 12 psi.

Both turbos are pushing air through to reach the desired boost level. It just means they can get there twice as fast with half the amount of work each.

Thankyou very much for your answer WRRR

lol pressure per square inch??

its actually POUNDS per square inch

and no the reason 1 turbo doesnt make enough power is because it doesnt supply enough air mass, which is volume not pressure.

Thats y u can make 300kw with gt'ss running 20psi+ or run a single t04z running half the boost to make the same power.

It flows more air. Power is made with the amount of air (volume not psi) and fuel u have in ur engine at any given time

More air n fuel = more power, but it is true more psi = more air BUT when a turbo reaches its maximum flow, it doesnt matter how much psi more u add, it doesnt mean more flow.

Just more heat :banana:

Gareth

I have been trying to keep it simple. There is more to it in terms of tune, cams, compressor design, etc.

Try this analogy (I just wrote all the stuff below not knowing how to explain this simply and then this came to mind).

Keeping it simple ay, I've been working in IT for a while, keeping it simple doesn't exist in most cases :banana:

Thanks for the detailed explanation, it makes sense, I just need to re-read it when I'm awake again, I think other posters in the thread probably have a valid point but there are a lot of mis-interpretations happening in the thread :)

Anyway, if a mod could clean and sticky this, OR at least add it to the tutorial page that would be great :banana:

lol pressure per square inch??

its actually POUNDS per square inch

Your right mate. It was a typo.

No one is saying that volume of air is not important. But to turn around and say that WRRR is outright wrong when he makes a statement is just counter productive. The point he was trying to make was spot on.

Like i said b4.. he was right.. sort of.

simple

all u gotta do is go through the bullshit he said and u will find truth in what he says, but to simple say, adding another turbo wont make power is the stupidest thing to say because if it was true.. then no1 would twin turbo any kind of engine

a single turbo can only do so much, do much less than what an engine can swallow, thats y ppl run bigger turbos and make more power with the same psi/boost/pressure.

my rotor made 240rwkw on 8psi.. single turbo... a stock gtr wont make 240rwkw on 8psi... with upgraded turbos u can. Flow is the key.. not just psi.

psi only gets u so far, Volume/flow is the only way to make power.

people make more power with the same psi becuase the turbos are more efficient, ie colder, more dense air...more air per unit volume.

saying that volume is the only answer is rediculous. no matter how much flow or boost ur running, your 500cc cylinder will always take in 500cc of air. volume of the cylinder is constant, same with the plenum, its a fixed volume.

turbos allow engines to make more power because there is more air in this same volume. the air is under more pressure, ie more air crammed into the same space.

Edited by Kranker

i see what u mean... volume on n/a goes outta the window on a turbo engine

Volumetric efficency is what im talkin about.. N/a engines r about 80% efficient

Turbo engines go over 100%. 500c will take 500cc of air... pressured air has more mass per square inch...

So if u were to take that pressurised air, and let itself decompress, ull have more air than 500cc worth...

Dude u can try to argue WRRR's point but u cant win. Ive been dealing with these things for a very very long time. i know what works and what doesnt. Why it works or doesnt. Its my job to know

so unless all my cars have been mistakes or flukes... i think u should just read the information and learn from it.

Mein Gott.

Talk about mixing up terminology and going in circles. To try and bring some sanity to this thread and stop some poor soul getting lost I shall steal from others -

"A turbocharger is an exhaust gas-driven turbine that compresses the intake air, increasing the horsepower and torque of an engine by increasing volumetric efficiency. This means that by compressing the air and increasing the density, you use a given volume of engine displacement more efficiently (volumetric efficiency). Denser air means more air atoms and more fuel atoms can be added into the engine. This makes more power."

If you want a relativly simple explanation (remember this topic fills books) including temp effects, turbo design and the basic calculations behind them go here - http://www.gnttype.org/techarea/turbo/turboflow.html. It aint perfect but it is not too bad.

Bumblebee - I respect the fact you are a mechanic and I am sure what you have been doing is resulting in positive outcomes. However I believe you are getting the terminology mixed up and confusing yourself and others. Have a read you might be surprised.

Last comment I shall add to this thread.

Sayonara. :ninja:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, that's kinda the point. The calipers might interfere with the inside of the barrels 16" rims are only about 14" inside the barrels, which is ~350mm, and 334mm rotors only leave about 8mm outboard for the caliper before you get to 350, And.... that;s not gunna be enough. If the rims have a larger ID than that, you might sneak it in. I'd be putting a measuring stick inside the wheel and eyeballing the extra required for the caliper outboard of the rotor before committing to bolting it all on.
    • OK, so again it has been a bit of a break but it was around researching what had been done since I didn't have access to Neil's records and not everything is obvious without pulling stuff apart. Happily the guy who assembled the engine had kept reasonable records, so we now know the final spec is: Bottom end: Standard block and crank Ross 86.5mm forgies, 9:1 compression Spool forged rods Standard main bolts Oil pump Spool billet gears in standard housing Aeroflow extended and baffled sump Head Freshly rebuilt standard head with new 80lb valve springs Mild porting/port match Head oil feed restrictor VCT disabled Tighe 805C reground cams (255 duration, 8.93 lift)  Adjustable cam gears on inlet/exhaust Standard head bolts, gasket not confirmed but assumed MLS External 555cc Nismo injectors Z32 AFM Bosch 023 Intank fuel pump Garret 2871 (factory housings and manifold) Hypertune FFP plenum with standard throttle   Time to book in a trip to Unigroup
    • I forgot about my shiny new plates!
    • Well, apparently they do fit, however this wont be a problem if not because the car will be stationary while i do the suspension work. I was just going to use the 16's to roll the old girl around if I needed to. I just need to get the E90 back on the road first. Yes! I'm a believer! 🙌 So, I contacted them because the site kinda sucks and I was really confused about what I'd need. They put together a package for me and because I was spraying all the seat surfaces and not doing spot fixes I decided not to send them a headrest to colour match, I just used their colour on file (and it was spot on).  I got some heavy duty cleaner, 1L of colour, a small bottle of dye hardener and a small bottle of the dye top coat. I also got a spray gun as I needed a larger nozzle than the gun I had and it was only $40 extra. From memory the total was ~$450 ish. Its not cheap but the result is awesome. They did add repair bits and pieces to the quote originally and the cost came down significantly when I said I didn't need any repair products. I did it over a weekend. The only issues I had were my own; I forgot to mix the hardener into the dye two coats but I had enough dye for 2 more coats with the hardener. I also just used up all the dye because why not and i rushed the last coat which gave me some runs. Thankfully the runs are under the headrests. The gun pattern wasn't great, very round and would have been better if it was a line. It made it a little tricky to get consistent coverage and I think having done the extra coats probably helped conceal any coverage issues. I contacted them again a few months later so I could get our X5 done (who the f**k thought white leather was a good idea for a family car?!) and they said they had some training to do in Sydney and I could get a reduced rate on the leather fix in the X5 if I let them demo their product on our car. So I agreed. When I took Bec in the E39 to pick it up, I showed them the job I'd done in my car and they were all (students included) really impressed. Note that they said the runs I created could be fixed easily at the time with a brush or an air compressor gun. So, now with the two cars done I can absolutely recommend Colourlock.  I'll take pics of both interiors and create a new thread.
    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
×
×
  • Create New...