Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

sorry, full circular divider?? Its a full split dump, so two pipes, which use a half inset moon on either side devider.... did that make any sense at all??? LOL

Mine is the same as this except in stainless:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v218/madwob/IMG_1436.jpg

It's coming off the car next week and is for sale (reason is getting bigger turbo, and dont want issues with the waste gate hitting the split pipe, it's perfect for standard turbo though)

Yes a full ciricular divider that goes into the turbos rear impeller to make sure that there is no conflicting of exhaust gases, its the other option besides the half moon, but is used only for your stock turbo as the half moon can be used for stock and hi flow hence the half moon shape :D , used to make these pipes and supply batmobl, if you guys really want something custom made we can do it for you just shoot me a pm...

Edited by FOOLBOOST

is there anyone in oz making quality bellmouth dumps these days? I notice batmbl's website is only selling the split dump and I'd prefer a simple bellmouth. Cheaper to make and just as good for what I need it for.

Could always buy an Xforce because it's hard to f**k up a bellmouth dump pipe but if an aussie made one is not much more I'd rather keep it local!

ok im a newby and dont know jack about exhausts. i have a stock s2 and wont be increasing boost much at all. what would be my best option for a better sound and a bit more power. leaving the stock dump pipe and then buying a hks or similar front pipe. pls explain from front to back what pieces are required and any brands etc recommended.

sorry guys but i need to start learning somewhere:)

About the gktech dumps, ive seen one and compared them to an original hks dump and the difference is very noticeable!!!!!

The workmanship and quality was enough to change my mind and go for the original.. as u see in the pics ive posted earlier.....

i dont know anyone who has tested one so i cant say if they work well but If you were sticking with a stock turbo setup it would probly be ok, they are a good price.....

i also was thinking of getting one untill i compared the 2.

The thickness of pipe wasnt what was said it should be and the welds werent smooth with the joins...

but i was lucky to get a hks for $270

is there anyone in oz making quality bellmouth dumps these days? I notice batmbl's website is only selling the split dump and I'd prefer a simple bellmouth. Cheaper to make and just as good for what I need it for.

Could always buy an Xforce because it's hard to f**k up a bellmouth dump pipe but if an aussie made one is not much more I'd rather keep it local!

I bought the Bellmouth dump/front from Flyn Performance.

http://www.flyn.com.au/home.htm

Fit perfectly first go without any modifications required.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
    • Yes they do. For some maybe. But for those used the most by abusers, ie Skylines, the numbers are known. The stock eyebrow height for R32/3 Skylines is about 365/375mm or thereabouts. The minimum such heights are recorded in adjacent columns in the database.
    • Hmmm, interesting. Makes me wonder whether there is bias as well. It's the cheapest fuel, so it is used for all kinds of ill-maintained shitboxes which are bound to have issues regardless. Nicer cars tend to require higher octane rated fuel and can't use it anyway. FWIW, the official NSW E10 facts page is decent. 
×
×
  • Create New...