Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

is your rolling diameter the same?...if not your not doing your transfer case and front diff any favours.

Yeah man!

Front is 235 / 45 / 17R

Rear is 245 / 45 / 17R

LOL! I made sure and my mechanic fitted them on and he knows what he's doing.

:(

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/244290-are-these-te37s/#findComment-4255769
Share on other sites

Yeah man!

Front is 235 / 45 / 17R

Rear is 245 / 45 / 17R

LOL! I made sure and my mechanic fitted them on and he knows what he's doing.

:(

just so you know, your rolling diameters are slightly different.

side wall measurment is calculated by (in the above example) finding 45% of 235 which is 105.75, and dividing by two (52.875). This is your side wall in mm, or pretty close anyway.

your other tyre is 55.125, its fark all and i dont know if it makes a difference but yeah...

Edited by nee-sanRB20
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/244290-are-these-te37s/#findComment-4255876
Share on other sites

just so you know, your rolling diameters are slightly different.

side wall measurment is calculated by (in the above example) finding 45% of 235 which is 105.75, and dividing by two (52.875). This is your side wall in mm, or pretty close anyway.

your other tyre is 55.125, its fark all and i dont know if it makes a difference but yeah...

I see.

Iam not to sure myself as my mechanic sorted out the correct tyres for me.

So what you just explained about the side wall measurements, is that also how to work out the rolling diametres..?

52.875 and 55.125

As you have worked out?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/244290-are-these-te37s/#findComment-4255920
Share on other sites

I see.

Iam not to sure myself as my mechanic sorted out the correct tyres for me.

So what you just explained about the side wall measurements, is that also how to work out the rolling diametres..?

52.875 and 55.125

As you have worked out?

i guess it would be the above measurements x2 for the top and bottom side walls of the tyre + your rim diametre in mm. :rofl:

.....i think!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/244290-are-these-te37s/#findComment-4256082
Share on other sites

i guess it would be the above measurements x2 for the top and bottom side walls of the tyre + your rim diametre in mm. :rofl:

.....i think!

Alright cool!

Well I need new rear tyres soon, so I ask my mechanic to explain to me the rolling diametre and the rest.

Thanks everyone!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/244290-are-these-te37s/#findComment-4256245
Share on other sites

you should be using width same with tyres....245 all round 4 example... hmmmm regret selling my te's now :P

The front are abit smaller so I don't get any side wall rubbing against the tyres.

What wheels you got now?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/244290-are-these-te37s/#findComment-4265375
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...