Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

I've currently got the sk suspension kit installed in my r33 gts-t and I'm having trouble with the front shocks not having enough travel, they bottom out on rough roads. The rear's do not do this even when the car is loaded with fuel.

I have cut the bump stops down to the point where they're nearly doing nothing and the height setting is only one circlip under sk's recommendation (which still isn't low at all).

Does anyone know if bilstein do a shock absorber with more travel and less height than the ones supplied in sk's kits? I'm really interested in finding a front pair if they're better suited as the current bilsteins really annoy me. I don't want my car excessively low, just the guard down to the top of the tyre.

Is there a size listing or catalog on bilstein shocks?

Brett.

PS I would have liked to contact sk about this but his inbox is always full

I agree that the bump stops do come into play too much (mine is correct height). I think it's more that the basic geometry can't be any lower than that with those spring rates. If you want to be at the top of the tyre (prob 330mm from centre to guard) then you are lower than recommended and will need higher spring rates.

Something like 6kg/mm I guess will be required for top of tyre guard height.

If it wasn't hitting the bump stops the tyre would hit the inside of your guard - but I guess you have removed the plastic inside the guards?

The tyre doesn't touch the guard (no wear marks visible) but the shock absorbers completely bottoms out. If you have the front bar off you can fit your hand in behind in the strut assembly and feel there very little travel to the bump stop.

I guess a heavier rate spring would sought of solve the situation but the ride is already too stiff for me. Out of interest what be the spring rate of the whiteline items provided in the sk kit?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I've seen similar actually in my situation. You never know what tables are attempted to be used when the car thinks it's -99C or +200C. The fail state is not usually that extreme but you know what I mean - it was in my case though! This is where being able to read all the sensors is useful cause you see this stuff really quickly.
    • The above is very important. However as long as you keep timing relatively low, it's plausible to make your own knock ears and plausible to learn to tune with a modern ECU that can do wideband O2 correction like a boost controller. I mean if you only have one viable road to even drive the car on, learning to tinker to this level may be worth doing given you can't do much else with the car...?
    • I find the fact that the rear plate has to be bent inwards at the rear not so bad: but the front is just awful: It's like come on. (these are my very old, now retired/turned in plates) TBH it is a lot of money to fix a minor issue, the fact I said "I'll never really spend the money on doing this" is why people ended up buying them as a gift for a 'car guy' who can be hard to shop for.. for car guy things.
    • I just bent the ends of my premo plates. It even went through Regency like that after the engine conversion and the inspector (a great bloke!) just squinted his eyes and said "I didn't see that". Plates, and how they look, are just something that have zero importance to me.
    • Yeah, I would have said the same. It makes me suggest that there are other things wrong, such that the ECU is totally unhappy with the broken sensor. The only other thought here is that maybe it is shorted, which might cause a different issue to the typical "disconnected" sensor.
×
×
  • Create New...