Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys,

thought aswell post this up,

I have a HKS boost controller, ive put a rb25 into my skyline and now im trying to figure where to hook everything up,

ive uploaded a document with the instructions to hook up this controller but, this controller uses 3 vacuums if that makes sense (you will see in diagram),

so it says 1 goes to plenum or just behind the throttle body (tell me which ever 1 is better)

2 goes to acuator on turbo,

and the 3 goes on the hot pipe of the intercooler piping, which is where my problem is, i dont have a vacuum line coming from my hot pipe or any intercooler pipe for that matter,

where should i put this line?

Thanks JV

HKS_IV_Manual_1.0.pdf

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/247025-setting-up-my-ebc-rb25/
Share on other sites

Nah don't do it to the plenum, you want it as close to the turbo as possible. So id fork out some cash and get some one to weld in a nipple on the cooler pipe coming out from the turbo.

Im guessing its a stock turbo and therefore doesn't have a nipple on the compressor housing?

yeah man stock turbo, mmm damn thats annoying i have to say, who will do that? i mean i could maybe get the welders at work to do it, what about, drilling a whole into it and then somehow putting a copper nipple into it?

o and also, that line that says go behind the throttle body, there is a vacuum thing that sits just above the throttle body, put that 1 line there? and the other to hot pipe?

Cheers

Easiest one to use is the vacuum line that goes to the fuel pressure regulator to the left of the oil cap.

Actually i just remembered (sorry mine is all aftermarket/custom shit so i forget what it all looks like from factory) there is a little nipple on the black intercooler pipe that goes from the turbo to the side mount intercooler. It's the one the factory boost solenoid uses. Have a look and you will find it. Here's a quick pick (its late so bare with the crapness lol)

Hope that helps ya man.

post-35676-1228144871_thumb.jpg

EDIT: Unless you have custom pipework like me, therefore you wont have any nipple, which after reading your original post is most likely the case. So yeah you could drill a hole into the pipework, and use a brass fitting and try to either weld it in or something.

Edited by PM-R33

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...