Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hay guys iv just spend 20k on a rebuild of a RB30/26.

it seemed to run fairly clean on initial start up of engine.

have had the head off and slight tune on idol.

since this the car is miss firing n seems way too rich, fouling plugs and blowing alot of black smoke!

it is missing down low around the 2000-3500 RPM, it runs ok really low in the rev range n when you get it boosting or into the rev range it clears out.

i am wondering if anyone can help point me in the right direction, is this just the tune (i assume it has only been tuned on idol n full throttle not using the matrix mode for the microtech) or do i have a fuel or ignition problem and the computer it self?

could it have anything to do with the heat sensor in the block giving faulse readings, or injectors since they have been sittin for over a year while iv been building this engine?

there is so many things it could be if it not the tune, n i don no were to start.

this car owes me round the 50k mark n it got taken off the road a week after i bought it and has only just been finished now, a year n a half later.

you could imagine my fury as its still not right, any help would be greatly appreciated thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/249227-miss-firing-drama-microtech/
Share on other sites

this will be the best advice you will get.

Take that computer out, burn it.

Get a Autronic / Motec / Vipec computer & install it.

get it tuned and enjoy your car.

If you keep playing around with the microtech you will end up spending a shitload more money on the car for no reason.

Change the ecu. change it NOW.

end of rant

I agree with Guilt toy. The LINK Storm does a plug in for the R33 (i assume thats what you have ?) ... The Vi-Pec is a LINK customised to suit Ray Halls specs. Both work very well.

And even if you keep the microtech, there is no excuse for not using the matrix mode, using the original single rpm load based mode is ludicrious.

I know the Micros have there fan boys, especially rotarys, however from a tuners point of view, there really is alot better gear out there with finer resoloution and much better features that give you the opertunity to make the car drive alot nicer in all the areas between full power and idle !! And thats where you spend 90% of your driving time !

That being said, it still sounds like the Microtech isnt tuned well, and if your adamant about keeping it, im sure you could obtain a much better driving experience while still using it if it was tuned better.

Gary

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Just wanted to unearth this and post my baby with the new front ❤️😝 Took her to my wedding rehearsal today. Next up is getting wide skirts (after wedding)
    • Yea, that is what I was getting at in my ramblings too. The nismo one actually is a 1.5 way and a 1 way. They don't do a *2* way because a true *2* way would have equal ramp angles. Or is that a true 1.5 way? Realistically I think a "1.5 way" does not actually exist. A diff can either lock in two directions or one. It also doesn't help that a LOT of people in Australia speak about 1.5 way diffs are referring to their 1 way diff.
    • Well, the trouble with that ^^ is: The configuration shown is absolutely a 1-way, not a 1.5-way. There is no way that a 1.5-way can be said to offer LSD action only on acceleration. If Nismo cannot get that right, then it is impossible to believe their documentation. That ^ is not a 1.5 way setup. That is a 1-way.   And so now I have allowed all doubts to flourish and have gone back to look at the MotoIQ video. I originally made the mistake of believing him when he said "this is a 1.5-way" at the ~6:10 mark. Because what he did was take the gear assembly out of the 2-way opening and just rotate it one place to the left to drop it into the 1-way opening. When he dropped it in there, the cam was "backwards" compared to the correct orientation shown in all other photos of that config. The flat shold have been facing the 1° ramp side of the opening, not the 55° ramp side. And I thought, "gee that's cute", but I was concerned at the time, when he put the other ring back on, that the gap between the rings looked like it was wider then in the 2-way config. And then I said a lot of things in my long post on Tuesday that could only make sense if the guy from MotoIQ was correct about what he'd done. BUT... I have now done my homework. I grabbed a frame of the video with the 2-way config, and then grabbed another with the "1.5-way" config, snipped out the cam and opening of that frame and just pasted it direct on top of the 2-way config. I scaled it so that the triangular opening was almost exactly the same height in both. AND.... the gap between the plates is wider with the cam installed in the triangualr opening backwards. That is.... it cannot go together that way. There would be massive force on the plates all the time, if you could even reassemble it.  So, My statement on the matter? The Nismo diff is actually only a 2-way and 1-way. There is no 1.5-way option in it, regardless of what they say. Here's a photo of a real 1.5-way ramp opening from Cusco (along with the 1 way option). And the full set of 1 through 2 way options from their racing diff, which is not same-same as what we'd typically be using, but...the cams work the same. A little blurry, but it comes from this Cusco doc, which is quite helpful. AND.... Cusco do in fact do what I suggested would be sensible, which is to have rings that do 1 and 1.5, and 1.5 and 2. Separately.  
    • Welcome Adam. Car looks great!
    • "With a 1.5-WAY, the LSD is effective only during acceleration."
×
×
  • Create New...