Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys, have just gotten a new top mounted manifold kit with an external wastegate its a gt35r 0.82 on a rb25 with a 44mm tial wastegate being controlled by a blitz sbc i colour

No matter the settings on the controller the boost is very laggy comes on very late, the ebc doesnt have any control on the boost ive tried a few things and I'm stumped.. I've tested the wastegate with 25psi into chamber A and it opens, but air comes out the sides of the wastegate im not sure if thats normal??

i am also having a problem when i put the clutch in the car stalls.. i have a gfb plumback on the car and i thought with it plumbacked it was meant to stop the stalling issue?

anyway any help with the problems would be greatly appreciated

Jarrod

Edited by jarrod83
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/250874-new-turbo-setup-cant-control-boost/
Share on other sites

pretty sure its set up right as per the blitz sbc manual, the IN goes to the cooler piping, same as the B chamber, n chamber A goes to the OUT on the sbc, the tial instructions are similar

car has only been mildy tuned, slightly on the rich side of things mid 13s on light cruise, and low 11s on boost, havent tuned it up any more because the new 5 puk clutch is already slipping and i cant turn the boost down

starts coming on boost around 4000 and kicks in low 5000rpm... its more when im at say 5000 revs in 3rd n i put the foot down it takes a far few seconds to come on boost

mods plazmaman plenum, nismo 740 injectors, power fc pro, nismo fuel pump, 6boost manifold, tial waste gate, gt35R 0.82 turbo, 3.5inch dump n front pipe n cat 3inch back from there

I have heard the same about the 6boost manifolds as the wastegate comes of the collector and doesnt flow properly....?

Either way I bought a 6boost manifold and will find out in a week or so how it goes. I have a 60mm turbosmart gate on my T51r setup.

Does it spike to 17 straight up or does it build from say 10psi and then creeps to 17?

Eliminate the boost controller by just running a signal line from the IC piping to the bottom side of the gate and see what happens then.

If it still creeps to 17 then gate is too small or manifold design is rubbish.

If it doesnt creep and is fine, its the controller connection/setup.

my wastegate is mounted off the turbo's exhaust housing, was told it offers better boost control

the boost starts building at little after 4000 and slowly builds to abit over 5psi then the big boost hit kicks in n it jumps straight upto the 17psi, its a bit hard to tell if it spikes to 17 or if it holds there cause it all happens pretty quick

I'll hook the wastegate to the cooler piping later when it cools down abit, what sort of boost should it hit when its set up like that

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Pay careful attention to the kinematics of that upper arm. The bloody things don't work properly even on a normal stock height R32. Nissan really screwed the pooch on that one. The fixes have included changing the hole locations on the bracket to change the angle of the inner pivot (which was fairly successful but usually makes it impossible to install or remove the arm without unbolting the bracket from the tower, which sucks) and various swivelling upper arm designs. ALL the swivelling upper arm designs that look like a capital I (with serifs) suck. All of them. Some of them are in fact terribly unsafe. Even the best one of them (the old UAS design) shat itself in short order on my car. The only upper arm that works as advertised and is pretty safe is the GKTech one. But it is high maintenance on a street car. I'm guessing that a 600HP car as (stupidly, IMO) low as you are going is not going to be a regular driver. So the maintenance issues on suspension parts are probably not going to be a problem. But you really must make sure that however your fairly drastically modded suspension ends up, that the upper arms swing through an arc that wants to keep the inner and outer bolts parallel. If the outer end travels through an arc that makes that end's bolt want to skew away from parallel with the inner bolt, you will build up enormous binding and compressing forces in the bushes, chew them out and hate life. The suspension compliance can actually be dominated by the bush binding, not the spring rate! It may be the case that even something like the GKTech arm won't work if your suspension kinematics become too weird, courtesy of all the cut and shut going on. Although you at least say there's no binding now, so maybe you're OK. Seeing as you're in the build phase, you could consider using R33/4 type upper arms (either that actual arm, OEM or aftermarket) or any similar wishbone designed to suit your available space, so alleviate the silliness of the R32 design. Then you can locate your inner pivots to provide the correct kinematics (camber gain on compression, etc).
    • The frontend wouldn't go low enough because the coilover was max low and the upper control arm would collapse into itself and potentially bottom out in the strut tower. I made a brace and cut off the kingpin and then moved the upright down 1.25" and welded. i still have to finish but this gives an idea. Now I can have a normal 3.25" of shock travel and things aren't binding. I'm also dropping the lower arm and tie rod 1.25".
    • Motor and body mockup. Wheel fitment and ride height not set. Last pic shows front ride height after modifying the front uprights to make a 1.25" drop spindle.
    • Here's Logans Silvia with R32 Drivetrain, mine will be slightly lower (more angle). He was constantly blowing the RH axles at around 16deg. I want to avoid this.    
×
×
  • Create New...