Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

in the early stages of getting together a 26/30

theory is if i mod my 32, with things that i can use on a 30 as well

i know -10 will be fairly laggy on my stock 26 but i only want to buy it once...

im aiming for (in the 26/30) bout 500hp atw with as much torque as possible, building this sucker for the hills, with stock crank and forged rod and pistons.

question is by changing the exhaust manifold will i get alot more torque?? oh and is it as a rule of thumb, the higher to cp the higher the torque but the lower the max hp??

Edited by Dearlove
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/252127-10s/
Share on other sites

Ah great, another GTR being built for hills. The ONLY reason i still have mine is the fun it can be on the right hills :P

Ive done a lot (days and days worth) of thinking about what would be unbeatable up hill runs, here are my thoughts;

-Full built RB2630 with stock crank, mild ported head, no bigger than 270deg cams, 2860-7's,

-Full built RB2630 with stock crank, heavily ported head, 270deg huge lift cams, 2860-5's

-Full built RB2630 with stock crank, mild ported head, 260deg cams with huge lift, R34 N1's

Id imagine any of those would be uncatchable.

To answer your question though, i would suggest 2860-5's instead of the -10's. There's plenty of street GTR's (2.6L) using the -5's and seeing some pretty great results. Ive been in a couple with the -5's and they haul ass in a big way. Yes the -10's will give you higher numbers but the thing is, if you're going after 500hp at the treads just for mountain runs there's no point having unrequired lag on your way to 500hp.

Id be going;

-Mild head porting

-Tomei 260 10.8mm lift cams

-Tomei buckets

-Tomei springs

-Stock exhaust manifolds port matched and ceramic coated

-Tomei dumps ceramic coated

-Ceramic coated front pipes (whatever brand, just good flowing)

-Dash 5's

-9.0:1 CR or higher

plus all the usual shit :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/252127-10s/#findComment-4362306
Share on other sites

Here's a question i asked in the main Mod forum but there has been no response so i'll ask it here. Just substitute RB26/30 where you see RB26/GTR as i'm really more interested in how responsive they will be on a 26/30.

There is a turbo in the Garrett range between the -5 (GT2860R 62 Trim) and the -10 (GT2871R 52 Trim), that being the GT2871R 48 Trim. Garrett has rated it to 400HP (they rate the -10 to 460HP), i was wondering if anyone has ran one of these on a GTR as i can imagine they would be a lot more responsive than the -10 and would yield a lot more power that the -5. To run one of these though, you would have to get Garrett to modify a -5 compressor housing to fit if you want to retain the factory piping but they would be willing to do it and I wouldn't imaging it would cost much.

GT2871R 48T 400hp

http://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbobygarre...1R_743347_1.htm

Vs'

GT2871R 52T-10 460hp each

http://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbobygarre...R_707160_10.htm

I'm looking at building a RB26/30DETT at some stage in the not too distant future and i and seriously looking at running these on that as i imagine that the response of the 48Trim's on a 3 litre would be similar to that of a set of -5 on a 2.6 litre.

Edited by D_Stirls
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/252127-10s/#findComment-4362715
Share on other sites

ya links didnt work mate

thanks steve-o, yeah the hill runs are what these cars are about!!!

so -5 will see me to 500hp easily enough??? well thats got me sorted then.

so whats the best way to maximise the torque?? high cp and ported head??

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/252127-10s/#findComment-4362782
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • I neglected to respond to this previously. Get it up to 100 psi, and then you'll be OK.
    • I agree with everything else, except (and I'm rethinking this as it wasn't setup how my brain first though) if the sensor is at the end of a hose which is how it has been recommended to isolate it from vibrations, then if that line had a small hole in, I could foresee potentially (not a fluid dynamic specialist) the ability for it to see a lower pressure at the sensor. But thinking through, said sensor was in the actual block, HOWEVER it was also the sensor itself that broke, so oil pressure may not have been fully reaching the sensor still. So I'm still in my same theory.   However, I 100% would be saying COOL THE OIL DOWN if it's at 125c. That would be an epic concern of mine.   Im now thinking as you did Brad that the knock detection is likely due to the bearings giving a bit more noise as pressure dropped away. Kinkstah, drop your oil, and get a sample of it (as you're draining it) and send it off for analysis.
    • I myself AM TOTALLY UNPREPARED TO BELIEVE that the load is higher on the track than on the dyno. If it is not happening on the dyno, I cannot see it happening on the track. The difference you are seeing is because it is hot on the track, and I am pretty sure your tuner is not belting the crap out of it on teh dyno when it starts to get hot. The only way that being hot on the track can lead to real ping, that I can think of, is if you are getting more oil (from mist in the inlet tract, or going up past the oil control rings) reducing the effective octane rating of the fuel and causing ping that way. Yeah, nah. Look at this graph which I will helpfully show you zoomed back in. As an engineer, I look at the difference in viscocity at (in your case, 125°C) and say "they're all the same number". Even though those lines are not completely collapsed down onto each other, the oil grades you are talking about (40, 50 and 60) are teh top three lines (150, 220 and 320) and as far as I am concerned, there is not enough difference between them at that temperature to be meaningful. The viscosity of 60 at 125°C is teh same as 40 at 100°C. You should not operate it under high load at high temperature. That is purely because the only way they can achieve their emissions numbers is with thin-arse oil in it, so they have to tell you to put thin oil in it for the street. They know that no-one can drive the car & engine hard enough on the street to reach the operating regime that demands the actual correct oil that the engine needs on the track. And so they tell you to put that oil in for the track. Find a way to get more air into it, or, more likely, out of it. Or add a water spray for when it's hot. Or something.   As to the leak --- a small leak that cannot cause near catastrophic volume loss in a few seconds cannot cause a low pressure condition in the engine. If the leak is large enough to drop oil pressure, then you will only get one or two shots at it before the sump is drained.
    • So..... it's going to be a heater hose or other coolant hose at the rear of the head/plenum. Or it's going to be one of the welch plugs on the back of the motor, which is a motor out thing to fix.
    • The oil pressure sensor for logging, does it happen to be the one that was slowly breaking out of the oil block? If it is,I would be ignoring your logs. You had a leak at the sensor which would mean it can't read accurately. It's a small hole at the sensor, and you had a small hole just before it, meaning you could have lost significant pressure reading.   As for brakes, if it's just fluid getting old, you won't necessarily end up with air sitting in the line. Bleed a shit tonne of fluid through so you effectively replace it and go again. Oh and, pay close attention to the pressure gauge while on track!
×
×
  • Create New...