Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ok, so im still about a year of turboing my r33 but figured i might start planing and sorcing parts. so im wondering wether i should re-build my rb25de or do an engine swap. im hoping on doing a re-build ether way (as im looking for between 250-350rwkw) and i have been priced $2500 for rb25det engine, gearbox and loom.

so im asking what are the exact difforences in the turbo to not turbo engines? and what what i be looking at doing to the engine to pull those kinds of figures?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/255306-planning-for-turbo/
Share on other sites

If you're chasing those sort of figures...on an N/A R33 to Turbo conversion, I think you'll be looking at more than just the engine and gearbox.

At 250-350kw you would probably be better off buying a turbo R33 to start from, and you'll definitely want to upgrade the brakes, probably the diff as well.

Supporting mods that come to mind are wheels, tyres, brakes, diff, suspension. It's all well and good to chase that sort of power figure, but unless you can stop that power and control it, you won't have a car for long.

The dollars involved in doing this, you probably would be better off selling the N/A R33, buying a R33 GTSt and work on that. Though if you're prepared to upgrade just about everything then I can see where keeping the N/A car you have now is beneficial and saves the hassle of selling and buying again.

I would still look at a engine/box swap thoguh as a starting point, and while you have the DET engine out you can get it rebuilt then.

350RWKW is a lot of power! Why not buy a GTR? and go from there... you'll have a much better starting point to support those power figures...

If your going to rebuild anyway just leave it as is turbo it then rebuild it, otherwise Uve wasted 2500 bucks most na+t cars will last atleast a year so you can rebuild by then. That 2500 spend it on brakes and stud conversion, you don't need an upgrade of sway bars... It has nothing to do with your goal, forget suspension diff and all that shit until your engine is sorted, I would do the brakes then turbo then rebuild and finally suspension, alternatively buy an evo cheaper quicker everywhere 24000 evo 7 spend 6 grand you got a quick car, or sell it and buy an unfinished project with most the work done

what they said, and buy a GTR lol,

or another option is to do the DE+T, Run some E85 in it and a standalone computer with supporting mods, a standard turbo engine is pulling like 300rwkw on e85 without a rebuild..

and you have higher comp motor

mate ive spent close to 10grand on mods and im at 230kw now, and I didnt buy a new engine. and Ive still got a bit to go to get an extra 20-30kw out of her.

imagine how much u'll have to spend for a RELIABLE 350rwkw... i would be guessing around $25,000 done properly...

you could get a nice gtr for that...

ok so i have to do the stud convertion, is that a leagal stand point? 350 is probably too much, just an estimation but atleast over 200. silly question what is e85. and what are the percific difforences beween the turbo and na engine?

allso i have allready prettymuch done the suspention side of things, bushers, sway bars, and a set of tein coil overs. brakes will be done before i turbo it. im just keeping the car for the fun of building it. that and alot is allready done.

Edited by PandaR33

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...