Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys just a little confussed with my situation at the moment, i have a 89 model r32 gts-t with a rb20det engine and has about 189k on the clock.....obviously pretty normal for a 20 year old car.

the mods i have so far consist of a free breathing pod filter and a turbo back 3' exhaust system, on standard boost (never been boosted before).

i was thinking on a rebuild but the price on rebuild start at 3-4gz and thats alot of money to be throwing around to recondition a 20 year old motor. so i thought id do a rb25det engine swap with lower ks, something along the lines of 100k to 120k. but id like to find out if the rb20det ecu and wiring harness will support that, and/or will the rb20det manifold and turbo bolt straight on the the rb25det due to alreadyy having a trubo back exhaust and will save abit of money on the engine buying it less turbo, less manifold etc.

i would like to know what i can keep to use on the rb25det form my rb20det and what i may need ontop to complete this project....

will appreciate all ideas!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/255784-rb20det-to-rb25det/
Share on other sites

AFAIK,

The ECU will be OK, after a dynotune/remap. Some RB25s don't use igniters, some do, so check with an engineer/mechanic if this makes a difference.

The turbo is different in the RB25, it's bigger. This means you'll get less performance out of the RB20 turbo on the 25 which negates the purpose of getting an RB25 in the first place. The response may be quicker, the low down torque may be better, but overall power will probably be down. I've not heard of anyone putting a 20 turbo on a 25. People with RB20's upgrade to 25 turbos all the time.. Otherwise you might as well get another RB20.

Your exhaust can prolly be modified by an exhaust shop to fit the new turbo, if it even needs it. Pretty sure bolt patterns are the same. Shouldn't cost that much.

The gearbox from the RB25 is much stronger. I would get it, as the 25 enigine may break a RB20 gearbox.

That's all I can think of right now.

The ECU will work but wont have the VCT and you'll need a remap. The wiring will be different so you will need to modify to suit the 25. The manifold and turbo will both bolt on but the 20 turbo would be too small so may as well get one with a 25 turbo. Wouldn't cost much more and the power would be worth it. Other parts you can use would be alternator, starter, coilpacks (if 25 is series 1) off the top of my head

Just did the conversion myself and recommend it to anyway! Cost me a shade over 3 grand doing everything myself except wiring.

Edited by TheProDaniel

If you are chasing more power then great. But if the RB20 is stilol running then dont think its on its last legs because it has a 190,000kms on it. My original engine had 150,000okms on it with 70,000kms of that being me of which about 3,500kms of strictly track work. LOL yes lots of days at Wakefield and EC. A wayward spanner then cost me that motor, not the engines fault though when pulling it down the bottom end looked fine.

The motor i replaced it with was a wrecker motor so who knows how many kms were on it. I have now put 45,000kms on this engine, with power being never under 215rwkws, mostly between 235-260rwkws with plenty of track work again....engine is still healthy.

So if you were thinking a bit of preventative maintenance on the RB20 because you thought it has high kms then i suspect you have nothing to worry about. If it is still healthy then stick with it and do a few basic mods. If you have big plans for more power or need a real grunty car for the street then it is best to shop for more displacement

If you are chasing more power then great. But if the RB20 is stilol running then dont think its on its last legs because it has a 190,000kms on it. My original engine had 150,000okms on it with 70,000kms of that being me of which about 3,500kms of strictly track work. LOL yes lots of days at Wakefield and EC. A wayward spanner then cost me that motor, not the engines fault though when pulling it down the bottom end looked fine.

The motor i replaced it with was a wrecker motor so who knows how many kms were on it. I have now put 45,000kms on this engine, with power being never under 215rwkws, mostly between 235-260rwkws with plenty of track work again....engine is still healthy.

So if you were thinking a bit of preventative maintenance on the RB20 because you thought it has high kms then i suspect you have nothing to worry about. If it is still healthy then stick with it and do a few basic mods. If you have big plans for more power or need a real grunty car for the street then it is best to shop for more displacement

I'm very glad I did the swap but my 20 was rooted so I do agree with Roy, good advice.

i did want to do some further mods such as, FMIC, r33 turbo, aftermarket manifold, and boost upto 15psi....but i thought that the amount of pressure on the high k'd engine would not support it and would soon after breakdown, as i cannot afford for something like that to happen...

so you guys suggest that if i do buy the rb25det, i get it complete with turbo, ecu and wiring harness?

i did want to do some further mods such as, FMIC, r33 turbo, aftermarket manifold, and boost upto 15psi....but i thought that the amount of pressure on the high k'd engine would not support it and would soon after breakdown, as i cannot afford for something like that to happen...

so you guys suggest that if i do buy the rb25det, i get it complete with turbo, ecu and wiring harness?

Is there any reason you expect the 20 to die? Has it been compression / leak down tested? I'd suggest doing that before you worry about a new motor. Those 20's are tough buggers (just look at Roy's).

If you do decide to go 25 I'd suggest def with turbo and it's probably easier to go with the wiring and ecu (as I did) but people have had good results with remapped 20 (Simon I think?). Here's some good info on the conversion should you wish to go down that path.

Predators Guide

Is there any reason you expect the 20 to die? Has it been compression / leak down tested? I'd suggest doing that before you worry about a new motor. Those 20's are tough buggers (just look at Roy's).

If you do decide to go 25 I'd suggest def with turbo and it's probably easier to go with the wiring and ecu (as I did) but people have had good results with remapped 20 (Simon I think?). Here's some good info on the conversion should you wish to go down that path.

Predators Guide

no it hasnt. i think i may stick with the rb20det motor and, boost it upto 15psi after the FMIC goes in....thats probably what i would end up doing, since you guys say the 20s are "tough buggers"

would 15psi be a safe level to boost a standard rb20 turbo, considering that its got steel turbines.....from what iv heard the r33 turboes are ceramic and cannot handle high levels of boost.

thanks guys

no it hasnt. i think i may stick with the rb20det motor and, boost it upto 15psi after the FMIC goes in....thats probably what i would end up doing, since you guys say the 20s are "tough buggers"

would 15psi be a safe level to boost a standard rb20 turbo, considering that its got steel turbines.....from what iv heard the r33 turboes are ceramic and cannot handle high levels of boost.

thanks guys

15 will be too much for the standard, each turbo is different so when it goes can't really be guessed. People have had them go at stock boost and you wont benefit too much with the stock ecu. Best to look at getting something to suit your application, plenty of good info around here. Bolting on the 25's turbo is a good cheap upgrade.

yeah man i wouldnt put alot of rb20 stuff on,

so what i did is bought a front cut pretty much (no gearbox) as i already had a rb25 gearbox, it cost me $2100, for a rb25det from a 97 stagea with 70,000kms on it, comp was about 150 in all cylinders, then with the wiring loom i have a guy who does the conversion so i can run air con and wipers work, that cost me $350 for a over night job,

everything on the car will line up with exhaust and stuff like that, strut brace wont fit if u have one (might if you have a manual tps) (auto has 2 plugs so it sticks up more),

depending on if you want to keep hicas or not you will have to change your harmonic balancer if you want to keep it, (why would u),

every1 says u have to use a rb25 accel cable by my rb20 one fitted fine,

RB20 turbos are ceramic so dont even bother with putting them onto the 25,

depending on series 1 or 2 engine, series 1 can use rb20 coilpacks (so if you have split fires),

all your alternator and ps and aircon will fit the 25 engine, just make sure you put on the rb20 engine mounts onto the engine,

Hope this helps

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
×
×
  • Create New...