Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all.

I'm chasing R33 GTR rims in any condition except buckled (don't care about gutter rash).

Also after a fixed back race seat. Brands like Recaro, Bride, Sparco, Cobra would be preferable.

Sending a PM would be best in case I don't check this thread.

Thanks guys,

Russ

if you decide to go for reclinable i have these

genuine SR4 $2,000 with recaro rails (blue or red)

DC5.jpg

RedSR4.jpg

Genuine Recaro SR3 from EK9/DC2

$1600 with rails

DC2SR3.jpg

DC2SR3A.jpg

Bride Ergo 1.5 with rail $850

BrideErgo.jpg

let me know if you interested

cheers,

thuy

Thanks anyway mate. I already have a recaro reclinable and the spacing of the harness holes are too close and cut into my neck.

bride carbon kevlar fixed back seat... $1200...for sale on SAU anyways

Yeah mate.

I saw that. Besides the head restraints (which I don't need anyway) I don't see why it's so expensive? I can buy a brand new Sparco/cobra seat for $1100.

I have a brand new Sparco ProAdv fixed back seat which I bought directly from the Sparco Distributor and I will accept $900 for it (rrp $1399).

I have a brand new Sparco ProAdv fixed back seat which I bought directly from the Sparco Distributor and I will accept $900 for it (rrp $1399).

How close is it to an EVO? I can get an EVO for $1k...

Yeah mate.

I saw that. Besides the head restraints (which I don't need anyway) I don't see why it's so expensive? I can buy a brand new Sparco/cobra seat for $1100.

"Carbon Kevlar"...i guess u dont know much when it comes to strong and light weight, durable materials...guess its too exotic for u :)

look it up urself...c what any bride carbon kevlar material seat goes for...not only are they rare..but expensive too...so i think u should do ur research buddy..

"Carbon Kevlar"...i guess u dont know much when it comes to strong and light weight, durable materials...guess its too exotic for u :blink:

look it up urself...c what any bride carbon kevlar material seat goes for...not only are they rare..but expensive too...so i think u should do ur research buddy..

Yeah I guess it is too exotic. I like racing my car... not my wallet.

Brides are very rarely a good fit unless if you're super slim. Also it looks hideous haha.

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty this is your red flag. In MAP based ECU's the Manifold pressure X RPM calculation is how the engine knows it is actually...running/going through ANY load. You are confusing the term 'base map' with your base VE/Fuel table. When most people say 'base map' they mean the stock entire tune shipped with the ECU, hopefully aimed at a specific car/setup to use as a base for beginning to tune your specific car. Haltech has a lot of documentation (or at least they used to, I expect it to be better now). Read it voraciously.
    • I saw you mention this earlier and it raised a red flag, but I couldn't believe it was real. Yes, the vacuum signal should vary. It is the one and only load signal from the engine to the ECU, and it MUST vary. It is either not connected or is badly f**ked up in some way.
    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
×
×
  • Create New...