Jump to content
SAU Community

Inner West Crew Whoretown (toowong/st Lucia/kenmore/indooroopilly And Sometimes Sunnybank?)


Recommended Posts

Nope :P I 'was' going for the nistune but now I'm not sure if I'm going to keep my car or not. Nistune being a cheap and very effective option...

Ask any mechanical engineer and they'll tell you if you want max power, forget about it being economical....

But I'm an Electrical Engineer... its about optimising and being efficient!

update:

car didnt make it out my driveway due to epic low

:bunny:

yes this means it is running strong :huh:

it's not that bad of a driveway :P ... how much stupid sauce was on the low burger?

*edit* and congrats on katie being up and about again :D *high five*

Edited by Isola
I didn't think there was a particularly good option for nistunes on 25s?

Either having to use a 20 ECU and lose VCT, or doing some sort of dodgy on a Z32 ecu?

You can't trust them though, they're always drunk.

Yeah the best option is using the z32 and keep vct. Its a pretty simple change over, no dodgy shit :P z32 ecu's are pretty cheap too and I spose you can get a lil money back selling your manual 33 ecu to someone doing a conversion...

Def agree with the drunk comment. Old uni mates are absolute pissheads....I envy them :bunny:

But I'm an Electrical Engineer... its about optimising and being efficient!

Nah man hes sayin when you start to chase power you throw fuel economy out the window

But I'm an Electrical Engineer... its about optimising and being efficient!

I'm a computer systems engineer... its about... um... getting the most amount of pay for the least work? :bunny:

it's not that bad of a driveway :P ... how much stupid sauce was on the low burger?

Maybe he needs to learn how to leb-spec it more?

*edit* and congrats on katie being up and about again :huh: *high five*

+1. But its Katey :D

update:

car didnt make it out my driveway due to epic low

:bunny:

yes this means it is running strong :D

I'll repeat what I said before.....SICK AS AIDS, breh. Chuck some planks of wood across your driveway :huh:

Nah man hes sayin when you start to chase power you throw fuel economy out the window

Exactly! This guy gets what I mean :P

Yeah the best option is using the z32 and keep vct. Its a pretty simple change over, no dodgy shit :bunny: z32 ecu's are pretty cheap too and I spose you can get a lil money back selling your manual 33 ecu to someone doing a conversion...

Coolies. I guess the only real downside then is you're still stuck with one of them dodgy AFM things :huh:

that's the best you could do for Damian's page?

:P

LOL

http://www.boostcruising.com/forums/index....t&id=956919

hectik uleh....

12 grand 380hp at 19psi,

can these things even handle that sort of power or is just wheelspin when u put ur foot down ?

300kms to a tank FTW :bunny:

450kms!!!

And even if I give it a bit every now and then, I'll still get 400kms. Anyway more accurate way to measure is 14L/100km

Nice! I was born in Mackay.

Whats out there? A mine or something?

They way I read it is that he was driving it up hills and leaving it in high gear (ie 4th or 5th) and then as it loaded up up the hill it started to struggle, so he held the clutch in instead of changing down a gear :P

Yea. We're building a new Coal Preparation Plant. I'll be there at least till end of May and probably go back again when I'm back from holiday until end of September when commissioning finishes.

Oh. I dont really read everything. Maybe thats why John gave me the "he's at it again". Hahaha I merely looked at the riding and slope. The first thing that came to my mind is taking off whilst on the slope.

http://www.boostcruising.com/forums/index....t&id=956919

hectik uleh....

12 grand 380hp at 19psi,

can these things even handle that sort of power or is just wheelspin when u put ur foot down ?

Adam, I am serious. I'm going to punch you in the vaginee when I see you next for posting that on a skylines forum.... LOL

450kms!!!

And even if I give it a bit every now and then, I'll still get 400kms. Anyway more accurate way to measure is 14L/100km

Yea. We're building a new Coal Preparation Plant. I'll be there at least till end of May and probably go back again when I'm back from holiday until end of September when commissioning finishes.

Oh. I dont really read everything. Maybe thats why John gave me the "he's at it again". Hahaha I merely looked at the riding and slope. The first thing that came to my mind is taking off whilst on the slope.

You wish bish :P

Edited by yaface

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
×
×
  • Create New...