Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi,

my new s1 r33 dash surround(the bit with the vents in it)has seen better days.

The coating is coming off in patches and a prev owner has cracked it below the gauges.

Whats my options?

Thinking of stripping all the old coating off - glueing up the crack and painting the whole thing.

OR

Buying a good secondhand one and stripping back the old coating and polishing the black plastic(with plastic polish), ive done this to the gear surround and it looks ok- but will it last?.

Is there a aftermarket replacement?

Any other ideas guy?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/271539-r33-dash-surround-isnt-pretty-ideas/
Share on other sites

Wear tear is something you can't avoid. However, you may want to do what you yourself suggesting, e.g. gluing cracked areas up and then respray etc, or you can carbon fiber the whole dash. I've seen a mate of mine done it and it looks awesome. Go for the darker more subtle CF. That's one idea.

Good luck. However, I think the R33 Dash looks tough as...so don't go changing it too much.

Prob the best place to start is ignore everything that spunky munky says, he knows NOTHING about what looks good lol.

Ive just gone through this dash thing myself, best way to fix the crack is bit of epoxy on the back and a plastic filler like plasti-bond from bunnings on the front and sand it flat. use a fine sand paper to remove the crappy peeling coating and get it back to plastic. A good laquer paint bonds well and will provide a nice matte finish, u can clear coat if u want a shiny gloss look but i personally reckon a black or dark grey looks best!

best of luck with it dude :cheers:

  • 2 weeks later...
black looks good...is that a matt black you used..ive always thought about doing mine black but have never seen pics.
The black looks great.

Do you need to use a special primer/paint to go onto the plastic?

Did you use a clear over it?

I just sanded the stock one back then used a spray primer then i did 3 coats of satin Black... Havent used a clear gloss on it and dont think i will.. it has come up really nice and im glad a changed it from the white...

Just got the Black satin paint from supercheap and the sand paper and primer from hardware store.... Good idea as it only costs about $30 for materials

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
×
×
  • Create New...