Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The old Tomei are 76.3mm (not sure if outer or inner, inner will be 70mm minimum), the new Expreme ones are 73.xmm (again don't know if that is outer or inner, again inner will be 70mm minimum).

If xforce copied HKS' dump pipe design, you can guess their front-pipe (y-pipe) might be a HKS copied design (the HKS front pipe is 2x 60mm into 1x 80mm)

yeah the Tomei dumps are about 75mm ID outlet. the best match for them is the current model HKS stainless front pipes which are 76MM ID as well into single 85 or 90mm ID. they are much better than the old twin 60mm HKS front pipes which everyone copied and the new ones use better flanges, better pipe and the pipe is welded to the flanges on the inside of the pipe which creates a nice smooth almost bell mouth type effect. not cheap, but they are qualiy.

yeah the Tomei dumps are about 75mm ID outlet. the best match for them is the current model HKS stainless front pipes which are 76MM ID as well into single 85 or 90mm ID. they are much better than the old twin 60mm HKS front pipes which everyone copied and the new ones use better flanges, better pipe and the pipe is welded to the flanges on the inside of the pipe which creates a nice smooth almost bell mouth type effect. not cheap, but they are qualiy.

when you say 75mm is that the new tomei ones or the old ones?

which ones is new? the one on the right? shame they are smaller now. I was talking about the ones on the left as being approx 75mm ID.

as fas as I've been able to find the only common off the shelf front pipes that are that large in the primaries are those HKS ones. They are very, very nice. I think they are about $800 delivered or so from japan. I reckon they are worth it thouh, it's a shame to get nice large dumps only to bolt twin 60mm front pipes onto them.

yeah it's possible. they are without question the nicest fron pipes i've seen. the next nicest were the nismo ones but they are twin 60mm. I had the nismo ones and upgraded to the HKS.

hmm, now that the nice big tomei dumps are discontinued I'll have to hang onto the ones I have. :P I have a feeling part of the reason for the new ones is ease and cost of manufacture. there is something nice about the old welded ones. they look more like artwork than car parts.

yeah bummer about that. I still kind of prefer the old ones. :(

the manifolds use the same casting for the pipes and then welded together. this helps them resist cracking as the pipes have not been bent or section welded to form the bends, they have been cast that way. they are very nice too.

picture006zr0.jpg

you can just see the inside of the welds inside the collector.

picture008qe3.jpg

so nicely made.

picture012so8.jpg

here's some pics of my tomei dumps. i've now used them on 2 of my GTRs and had a few sets for mates etc too. still have one set new in their box at home for spares!

picture015ah9.jpg

picture008oy1.jpg

picture005lv4.jpg

picture018pr1.jpg

picture017kp5.jpg

I would say the main reason of the move to the new style would be ease of fitment (with smaller pipe), ease of casting, lower cost to produce and most importantly consistency in manufacture. since having a few sets of the old style ones I did notice some were just a tiny bit better than others. obviously made by different people/different day etc. but still within an acceptable range.

I sold that set above for about $600. how much did you guys pay for the new ones?

well I've never cracked the old ones, nor heard of them cracking. but certainly the new ones would be even less prone to crack. any time you have welded pipe that is subject to wildly varying temps (from 0-800+ degrees) you have the possibility of cracking as the pipes heat and cool... expand and contract. but it was never a problem as far as my experience with them goes.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The prices I’ve heard aren’t that bad 
    • Oh, I also meant to say that it is possible to use a venting BOV and restrict its outlet down so that it does vent enough to prevent the sututu, but vents slowly enough that the AFM doesn't see all the air at once and makes it easier to avoid stalling.
    • I'll go talk to my bank manager. Either that or my nearest western Sydney drug baron.
    • Driveability will be about the same with either externally venting BOV, or no BOV at all. Perhaps worse one way than the other, with me thinking that the definitely more flow going through the AFM through a venting BOV more likely to cause rich stalls than the perhaps more flow that the AFM might read on reversion. There is no such thing as "turbo damage" from not having a BOV at stock, or even quite a lot higher than stock, power levels. You need a big turbo with a lot of mass spinning hard getting a horrible slowdown from a slammed shut throttle before there is anything like the shaft loads required to damage things. Not an issue on small turbos. The ONLY 2 reasons that Nissan put a recirc valve onto the RB were: It is a bypass valve. It is open when under vacuum. When not on boost, it bypasses intake air forward around the compressor, which unloads the compressor, allowing the turbine to sping more freely, making the whole lot a bit more efficient when just puddling around. Throttle response should also be faster via the shorter, smaller diameter BOV pipe (when in NA, ie before the BOV closes and boost is building) which is nicer for driveability. Emissions. The reversion causes CO pulses. Eliminate the reversion (or at least, keep it away from the AFM) and you don't get that. The stalling/driveability aspect could have been tuned around, as shown one example of by dose above, if Nissan hadn't put a recirc valve on. Many many turbo engines before the RB had no BOV. They did not stall. See the RB30 turbo as an example. Nistune is definitely better than just stock ECU. It allows you to access and change things that are not excellent on the stock setup, and allows you to do mods like put decent injectors in, relocate the AFM, put a bigger turbo or even cams, etc, on, change to coil swith completely different swell needs, etc etc. All the things that you might need or want to do 25 years after the car was new. Aftermarket replacement ECU is obviously better again, because it gives you even more freedom from the constraints of the stock ECU. I won't be needing to go any further than Nistune though, for the new turbo in the 250ish rwkW region I'm going to, with big injectors, and most other things being stockish.
    • Lucky the prp block is supposed to be released next weekend 
×
×
  • Create New...